Comprehensive Guide to Political Left and Right ideologies.

leftright

Many people get confused now, and even don’t recognize the differences in the left and right ideological systems.    They will even deny the existence of certain radical portions of their ideologies.

This is my guide to the left and right political ideologies.   I have created this in hopes to educate and help people understand.

Left.

The left is usually or used to be solely Liberal.   In Canada Liberals were somewhat respected even by those on the right.    There was some ideological differences but overall they got along.    Then the liberal party at some point got hijacked by what is now called progressives.     This will explain the differences between the two groups, and will explain how progressives in the left are not the same as a true liberal, albeit, they will appear similar.

Liberal Ideals.

1.  Free Speech.   

Liberals like free speech.  Even those views that they don’t agree with, they will respect the rights of those speaking it.    Generally most liberals will agree to this.   The ONLY exception is what they consider hate speech.   Which in the original sense (in Canada back in the 90s) was any speech that incited violence to a minority or minority group.      An example of this would be telling people “Kill all fags!”   Not “I believe fags should be killed”.      The 1st is a call to violence.   The 2nd is an opinion.   Liberals back in the 90s, didn’t like the hate speech laws being made but knew it was the only way to help gay people who were being killed, beaten and ignored by police and society.     It had it’s place in time but should have been erased from the criminal code a decade ago.

2.  Freedom of association. 

Liberals agree that this is a human right and we all have the right to associate with whomever we want.   This includes, the freedom to gather and protest.   Whenever and where-ever that protesting is needed.

3.  Equality.

This is the one that is important.   Liberals believe in equality of opportunity.   This means that everyone should have the equal opportunities.   For example,  Jessica is a black woman who is being interviewed for a job.   She is competing with a white man, and an  Asian man.     Their employer who is liberal will consider all three candidates based on their experience, and qualifications.    Their gender, sexuality, race have nothing to do with the hiring process.      All are equal in the opportunity for the position.

 

4. RACISM

Liberals are against racism and tend not to see people by the color of their skin, but the content of their character.

Liberals are more closer to the middle, but still left.     They tend to be tolerant and open to other views.   They show compassion and courtesy to even those they disagree with.

 

Now lets talk about Progressives.

Progressives are considered to be far left by many.   Their views are not based on liberal views but really on race, gender, sexuality.

1.   Freedom of Speech.

Progressives do not like freedom of speech.  They say they do but want limits on that speech. The only speech they like is speech that they like.  They want any speech that “offends” them to be banned.  They can’t ban speech, so they try to stop people from hearing the speech.     They love the current hate speech laws due to the fact the current hate speech laws in Canada are vague.    Here is the portion that describes hate speech in the criminal code of Canada.

“Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code make it a criminal offense to advocate genocide, publicly incite hatred, and willfully promote hatred against an “identifiable group.”

An identifiable group is defined as any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation or mental or physical disability.

The Code provisions are intended to prohibit the public distribution of hate propaganda. Private speech is not covered by the provisions: the act of promoting hatred can only be committed by communicating statements other than in a private conversation, and inciting hatred is only prohibited if statements are communicated in a public place. Online communications that advocate genocide or willfully promote or incite hatred are likely to fall within the provisions because the Internet is a public network.

Under section 320(1) of the Code, a judge has the authority to order the removal of hate propaganda from a computer system that is available to the public. Such authority extends to all computer systems located within Canada. To date, however, only one case has been successfully brought under that provision, in the province of Quebec. [2]”

What is vague is not the inciting of violence.  Everyone agrees to that.  What is in dispute is the rest.   Which I may add was easily added later by lawmakers silently.

The second part makes it illegal to say “I believe fags should die. ” .    The other parts make it so you can’t even write it.   Or share it.   My blog could be considered a hate crime if a progressive was to see it and report it.

2.  Freedom of Association.

Progressives do not like it when people they don’t agree with gather.    We have many examples of this.     The protests when men’s rights advocates gather to speak on men’s issues.     The protests and riots when conservative speakers go to a university to speak to people who voluntarily go to hear what they have to speak.   Their aim to stop people from attending.

3.  Equality.

The typical progressive wants equality of outcome.   Not just opportunity.     The difference of outcome is explained easily by the wage gap myth.   They expect the same money that men make, as the result of a lifetime.    They don’t understand, either by willful ignorance or by simply not being able to use reason and logic.     Women have been proven via the wage gap that they make different decisions in life.   They choose more humanitarian careers like in health fields nursing, health care, etc.   They dominate in certain fields but at the same time those fields pay less.    They choose these fields because of they get the ability to have more time off, for health, family, vacations etc.    Men on the other hand, will sacrifice more to be able to advance in their careers.   So they will take more dangerous jobs like policing, firefighters, military,  construction, oil rig worker, miner etc.   These jobs are higher risk for loss of life so they pay more than say a nurse.

The progressive doesn’t agree this is the reason for a gap.   They can’t.   They think that women should get the same pay as men period.   So the grand overview of the wage gap is their dragon to slay.    People who use reason and logic understand the differences and why this is wrong.

So to give an example:    Linda works for an Software company.   She was hired at the same time as Bob.  They both started in this company and have been working there a year.    Both started at the same wage.     Linda, decides to take time off to have baby.    She gets a year maternity leave.   During that time while she was away Bob worked hard, worked overtime and gained a raise and a promotion, while keeping up with the current technological advances which helped the company.     Linda comes back to work and finds she is out of date with her technological knowledge and needs more training before she can get back to work.    After a month of retraining she is back to working what she was doing.    However, now that she has a child, she rarely is able to work overtime, and in some cases has to ask her boss to leave early.      Bob doesn’t.    He is still working overtime and works hard.     Linda, gets a call and has to leave work in the middle of the day because her child is sick with the flu and has to go home to take care of the child.     Bob continues working, getting in a project ahead of schedule.     Linda comes back to work a few days later.

Over the course of their careers, Linda has had 2 kids, took 2 years off for maternity, had more time off for family vacations, sick days for the kids, her health etc.    Bob, sacrificed and worked a lot of overtime, earned more money and took less time off, and was more of a benefit to the company and so earned top dollar for his salary.

This is what progressives don’t agree with.   They believe that Linda should have been paid the same as Bob over the course of her lifetime career because she has been with the company the same length of time and had the same job to start with.    A progressive will see that Linda was discriminated against because she was not given the same opportunities as Bob during the career.

4. RACISM

Progressives will divide everyone by race, gender, sexuality, etc.     They see through the lens of victim status on these features of people.   Not on Character.   They label people racist who disagree with their views.   Will conflate genuine concerns over the religion of Islam as racist and will even call people racist for citing facts about communities because it points out a negative issue with that particular community.

Meanwhile they happily will be racist themselves, to white people.   They don’t see white people as a race but as the oppressor.     They will say “Kill all white people” and not understand that is a racist statement.      The ONLY people that are racist you see, are white people.  Therefor they aren’t and can’t be.     Even white progressives will say anti white things to white people.

They will get upset if a white person is proud of being white and what white people have accomplished in their history.   Like putting a man on the moon.     To them, white people should not be proud of the accomplishments, but be ashamed of the bad parts of history, like slavery.

Which brings up another part of the progressive ideology.   Slavery.   They will tell you that white people are the cause of slavery, even though this is not true.  They will ignore history and even attempt a rewrite of history to suit their agenda.

Slavery was NOT started by white people,  in fact no one knows who came up with the idea because it was practiced for thousands of years.    All Races participated.    In fact it still exists in some parts of the world.   White people were the first to STOP.     The American civil war was NOT about freeing slaves but over the establishment of the federal reserve and the central bank.   Lincoln, who was a slave owner himself, who had several children with his female slaves, had in fact garnered the support of black slaves by offering them freedom if they joined his army and that didn’t happen until he was losing the war.

The North Altantic Slave trade was not white people going into Africa to gather up black people.   No.  This is the part that progressives will devoutly  ignore and fight against.    The Tribes of Africa would raid other tribes and take prisoners.   The would invade neighboring countries and get slaves for themselves.    They had white slaves, black slaves, asians etc.     The Tribal leaders in Africa would SELL those people to the Slavers.  Not by threat, but in trade for things they wanted and gold.     Asians as well would raid other nations and take prisoners and sell them as slaves, to other countries and as well as white slavers.

If you hear a progressive you would think that it was ONLY white people enslaving people.    It wasn’t but they will adamantly deny the other races part in that because it undermines their ideological views.

5. Discrimination.

Progressives will happily tell you they don’t discriminate but will want policies that directly discriminate against men.  Particularly white men.    They will want “safe spaces” for women, and minorities and fight against safe spaces for men.   Especially on university campus.

One example would be a university in the USA where progressive students wanted one day without white people on campus.    One professor who was white said no, that it was discriminatory to demand this.     The students in outrage at being told this, protested , threatened the professors life and he had so many threats that he was forced into leaving the school for safety reasons.

Another example would be another professor who called for the genocide of white people, and that was perfectly tolerable by the faculty, staff and students.

I would also add in this topic of racism and discrimination that a progressive see’s nothing wrong with groups that support Hamas, (Palestine), who want to kill all Jews.   Islamic extremists for killing gay people, oppressing women.

The reason being is they are being tolerant of another religion, culture etc.  So child marriage, child rape, raping of women,  female genital mutilation is okay because it is a “cultural” thing.

In Canada, they will go as far as to think it is okay to allow Isis fighters back into Canada without any kind of punishment.      Just today there was a news report of a Canadian doctor who was on the Gaza strip that was killed when a group of “protesters” had tried to climb the wall and blow up the wall.    So the Israel troops fired on them.    The doctor got hit by a stray bullet and died.

The progressives all day have been spouting hatred for the Jews and spouting anti Jewish rhetoric.   Twenty years ago, those people would have been arrested for hate speech.   Today, they are allowed because the progressives believe they are not being racist, bigoted because they believe they are right.   Brown people (muslims) are an oppressed people by the nasty jewish people who are (white).

Progressives are the ALT LEFT of the left.  They are so authoritarian and so extreme that they run on par with KKK, and Nazis.   While fail to recognize they are that bad.

NDP

I’m going to be honest, the NDP are not a major player.   They tend to be Liberal Lite and don’t like progressives, but they themselves will back progressives on occasion.   They aren’t really that special but think they are.

The NDP fall between liberals and the progressives.    Middle left I would call them.

Now….

THE RIGHT!

Conservatives.

Conservatives used to be hugely dominated by the religious.  Mainly the Christians.   Back before education on homosexuality etc, it was a deeply sexist, and homophobic party with an ideology to match.

However today in the modern world, many real liberals have flocked under the conservative banner to stop progressives in the next election.

Back when Harper had been elected as PM (Conservative), he ran on a platform to stop gay marriage.    Fortunately he lost thanks to the supreme court.    And as a result the party stopped fighting against gay rights.     Now, while they don’t openly support gay marriage, they don’t openly go against it and as a result they are opening their party to new ideas.

Conservatives believe now what Classic liberals believe in.   They just don’t openly discuss their views on gay rights.

The one thing they are against is on demand abortion which I can support.     I don’t think killing babies on demand should be allowed.   I do think limits need to be placed.  Such as allowing rape victims or mothers whose life is threatened to be able to abort the child.   Not for a night out of partying and sleeping around and finding out your pregnant.      To many women abuse abortions.   Some use it as a primary birth control method and not as a last resort.     One woman I knew back in my 20s had never used birth control and used abortions as birth control.   She had a total of ten abortions over her short life.  Other women will abuse the privilege by finding out the gender of the child and if the child is not their preferred gender they want they abort and try again.

Conservatives in general tend to be on the right, but close to the middle, due to a few issues that they don’t agree on the left with.

FAR RIGHT.  Or ALT RIGHT

Is the same as progressives, only they are the opposite side.   So KKK, Nazi supporters People who are extremely homophobic, racist to anyone but white people.   Even the Ultra religious are included in this Far Right.    Like the Westboro Church.

The media confuses regular conservatives with the far right because they are all progressives pushing their agenda via the news.    So anyone they deem a threat to their narrative they will spout as Far Right.   And even go as far as try to pin Trump in that category.    Like Doug Ford.   He is a conservative, but is being labeled as the same as Trump.   In the media they treat Trump like he is Far Right.    He isn’t but that is how they see him and so any politician who remotely says the same things gets put in that category as a way to signal to the audience that they are racist on par with the KKK.

This is why people who watch the news get confused when they go watch speeches online by people labeled as Far Right and find their views pretty uncontroversial.

For example they stated that Milo Y.  is an Alt Right Figure head.    Milo is a gay white christian Jew, who is married to a black man,  who advocates for equal rights for all .     The media and the progressives will name him Alt Right because somehow they think he is racist, bigoted and even claim he is homophobic.


The progressive left and the media that is also progressive left will lead you to believe that anyone who isn’t on their side is evil.   They will attack all of these political parties by using SLURS.

Racism.   Misogyny.   Homophobic.   Trans phobic.  Islamophobic.

When you try to debate a progressive you will recognize them by their SLURS.    Most of their arguments are not based on facts but by feelings and when you challenge that with facts, they will resort to SLURS on your character every-time.

I personally blame feminism in it’s modern form because of inter-sectionalism.     I won’t define it here, but you can find it online.     Feminism is a form of Marxism, even with socialism mixed in.     It is why there is a hatred of men .    It is an ideology that generations have been indoctrinated into.     Which we are seeing the result in progressive ideology and their blind hatred of Donald Trump.

He is the epitimy of the patriarchy.   A Rich, Old, White Man, with a Beautiful supermodel wife.   Who is the leader of the free world.

This is why the progressives went into mass meltdown when Trump got elected.    He is the symbol of EVERYTHING they hate.    It’s why the progressive media won’t ever say anything good about Trump, even when it’s obvious Trump is doing a very good job.   They will deny it and make claims that it was Trump but someone else.    For example when Trump got people back to work by creating tax cuts and jobs came back.   Unemployment went to an all time low in over a decade.    Unemployment in black communities were at the lowest since the 60s.   Yet, they refused to admit that was Trump and tried to say that it was due to things Obama did that are now coming to fruition.

Even Canadian Progressives become unhinged at Trump.     I personally have lost friends over my support of Trump.   Those so called friends could not believe a gay man could support Trump.   Nor can they now believe I will support Sheer or Ford.

They hate the Carbon tax but don’t want to vote someone in who will get rid of it.    They hate high electricity bills but refuse to support the people who will reduce those bills.

All because of their ideology.

The upcoming elections in Canada and especially in Ontario will be interesting and will be one for the history books I think.      It will be a race in the provincial between NDP and Cons.     Federal,   I don’t think any party has a good chance except the Cons.  Progressives can’t win.   If they do we will see an increase in Ontario of 18 million immigrants as the progressive government currently plans to do by 2041.    That has to be stopped.    We don’t have the infrastructure to support that many people in Ontario.

So next election vote for the candidate, not the party.    If the candidate happens to be a conservative and has the same issues as you do with the current government then go for it.  If you area progressive, then go ahead and vote for your guy.

I’m going with my gut and voting Doug Ford and Andrew Sheer.

Advertisements

What exactly is Fake News? The Fake News War!

fake-news

Since before the american election last year, we have been hearing more and more about “fake news”, so much to the extent that the term has become part of the general vernacular of most people, and even those who don’t understand what the Fake News War is about, but will readily defend their favorite news agency.    So this is the break down on what exactly is fake news and why this is so important in the way it breaks down the public trust in the mainstream media outlets.

Lies by Omission.

Let’s face it all media outlets lie by omission, and there are some who at least try to be fully honest, however, there is some media outlets that stand out in doing this.  I will refer the most blatant one, the one that everyone loves to defend but has been proven time and time again to lie to the public.

What I mean by lies by omission is presenting the news but leaving out things to skew the perspective in favor of whatever agenda you wish to push.     For example, the election and Hilary Clinton.

CNN was blatant in this and to this day,  as I write this, they are still lying to the public about Trump.

Here is how they do it.

1.  Cherry picking.     They will present only certain parts of the story.   That can be video footage of a crying “victim” or  picking or choosing a specific sentence in a speech, which taken out of the context of the paragraph being said sounds damning.     CNN did this and still to this day does it.

I will use the famous “Grab her by the pussy” comment that they used from a 20 year old recording of Donald Trump that they recorded while he was chatting with a reporter off record during his Time on the apprentice and when he was funding the Miss America Pageant.

The context they conveniently left out when you hear the entire conversation was that he was talking about groupies.    Groupies are people who are  enamored with someone of celebrity status.   What Trump was discussing was how these people, in particular the women.  And as well when it came to that sentence in particular, he was talking about one experience in particular about his encounter with a groupie , who “WOULD have let him grab her by the pussy”, if he had wanted to.

This is a very big difference from the mainstream narrative of “Grab her by the pussy”.   This narrative makes it sound like he DID grab her by the pussy and he was bragging.   This lie by omission was done by remove key words to change the context of the conversation.  In other words, one is about how groupies act, and the other is how he acted.    All with that simple change.

All you have to do is listen to the entire recording to hear the context of the conversation to understand this was just a casual conversation about how women act around him.

2.  Faking News Reports using Green Screens.

CNN is admittedly the one news organization who gets caught on this.   The oldest I found was back at least 20 years ago where a reporter faked the news report and the footage is very clear on this.

Here is the oldest I found….

There are other examples, one that comes to mind is the Boston bombing, where they tried to fake the locations of an interview.

There is a multitude of green screen news reports that reduce the legitimacy of the news story and erodes the public trust from CNN.    Here is a video which highlights the most blatant ones.

What to look for?   The pixelation of the person on the green-screen.   The disappearance of body parts, or other objects being held by the reporter.

3.   Pushing an agenda.

All networks are notorious for this.   Fox seems to be the ONLY one who leans to the right.  The others are all part of the left.   This was obvious during the election coverage when we heard basically almost all good things from the left wing media outlets and all bad things about Trump.   This was done using the above methods.  Omitting certain facts, taking sentences Trump said out of context etc.

4.  Gate-keeping.

This is pretty bad because this is ultimately lying.    And this is why CNN now is being called fake news.     Gate-keeping is when they tell you only the facts or information THEY want you to hear.    For example, they will hold those live debates with a panel of people.  Usually 3 who follow their agenda and 1 who doesn’t.    Then when the person who is against their agenda speaks and starts speaking about facts that are provable, the other three with try shouting over the person, including the host, and if that doesn’t work they cut the feed in some way.  Most of the time citing they “lost the feed”.     Don Lemon, doesn’t even try anymore.   If he encounters someone he interviews who brings out verifiable facts, he just shuts down the interview.

5. Rinse and Repeat.

Do you notice CNN is still harboring the “Russian Hack” story over and over?    That is because a lie repeated can sometimes be believed if repeated long enough by enough people.   This is what they are trying to do with this whole Russian Hack story.  They claim to have proof but yet the FBI and CIA both have stated that while there was a hack by the Russian’s there was no evidence to show that it had influenced the election in any way.   And yet, over and over again they still talk about it and how they magically have proof but never present it.      They expect us the audience to eventually believe it because if it is reported enough then it must be true!

Now as a side note, most people think “fake news” are things like the National Enquirer etc, “Aliens ate my baby!” sort of stories.  Or the Onion etc.  And yes, they are correct.  Those are fake news stories.  Meant to be comedic in nature.       However, when Trump or commentators, or pundits call a news organization fake news, it is due to the above ways they have manipulated their audiences.      It is the reason why many news anchors of the past have left their media outlets and started their own news outlets online.

So please, the easiest way to see if a news outlet is lying is go to the source of what they are reporting.    Trump it’s pretty easy.   He posts on Facebook what he says and usually includes videos if he is doing a press conference or a news interview.    So you can hear directly what he had said in it’s proper context.

Modern Liberalism – The New Face of Hate.

We have turned a tide in what and who liberals are.   No longer can we say that Liberals are good people.   Kind people.  Or even tolerant people.     Today, those ideals belong to conservatives.

Classic Liberalism held to these ideals and many people who consider themselves liberal follow these values.    However, a new form of Liberalism has taken power and it calls itself progressive.

We saw this during the american Trump campaign.  The lies, the hate, the vile rhetoric and most importantly how progressive liberals, spread their banner of love under the actions of hate and fear.

Progressives are now the bullies and the hated.   Along with feminists and social justice warriors who all fly under the banner of progressive ideals.     I have to wonder though, how progressive is it, to attack someone for money, accept money to commit violence, lie about crimes against a minority group.

It’s time to call out liberals for what they are.   The rest of use just want to live in peace.   Live our lives the way we want, say what we want, when we want.     Criticize an ideology, idea, debate it, dissect it, without being called racist, sexist, bigoted or any of the other myriad of “isms” which are intended to quite our collective voices.     Did you know it is racist to criticize the crime that a person of color has committed?   That it is racist to believe that they actually did do the crime, even when that crime has been captured on video?

Liberal media is partially to blame for the modern day idea that these stories can be anything but what they say it is.   If you speak out against the narrative, then you get viciously attacked by swarms of liberals.

Take the recent story of the lady who spoke with Justin Trudeau over the skyrocketing hydro rates in Ontario.    She spoke with eloquence and with passion, from the heart.   Asking and speaking what many, many people in Ontario are thinking.   She has medical issues and yet she worked multiple jobs to pay a monthly hydro bill which was higher than her mortgage.     The response was disgusting.   Death threats, threats on her family, harassment and all for a 2 minute video of her asking questions of the prime minister and his lackluster non response.

You can see the bullying, attacks on people, almost daily.    And it will get worse.    We just had our own version of Trump announce that he will be entering the leadership race for the conservative party in Canada.  His name.   Kevin O’Leary.     A great businessman, but questionable on social niceties.    And just days after his announcement, the liberals are already passing insults, derogatory comments, and trying to smear his name and worse, ignore his accomplishments, by simply calling him a reality tv show star.

Liberals, Feminists, SJWs are bullies, racists and sexist.

You can always tell because they will use terms like “Mansplaining from a old white guy” – Ageism, Sexism, Racism is what I hear in that sentence.   Or how black people cannot be racist.   The idea that no other race can be racist when historically and currently, there is rampant racism in the other races.

So stop being nice to liberals if they attack you.  Don’t walk away.   Human beings won’t learn unless they get their proverbial hand slapped.   So let’s slap their hands.  Together we can make Canada great again.

Free Speech under attack in Canada

SilenceEqualsDeath

Today a news report came across my feed about a former MP who launched a class action lawsuit against a religious man who passed out pamphlets at the gay pride parade in Toronto.

The pamphlets being ultra religious, stated inflammatory information, like all gay people are aids carriers etc.    Much of it was disgusting, according to those who attended the parade.

However, when I asked the person who launched the Lawsuit, if the pamphlets contained calls for people to beat up gay people or to kill gay people?   He avoided answering.    Trying to deflect the question by stating that he wasn’t about to post anything what was in the pamphlets because he found it distasteful and disgusting.

I took that evasion to mean, that no, the preacher man didn’t have anything that called for the extermination of gay people or the harming of gay people.

Freedom of speech does not mean you only get to hear or read things that you like.  If that was the case, I would not be able to write my articles.  No news reporters would be able to actively report the truth.   People could be arrested for having the wrong views or opinions.  Books would be banned.  Movies, Television would be heavily censored.

Now while in Canada, we tend to be a more socialist nation than one of democracy.  In fact I have written on this numerous times.  I have also written how we don’t have free speech  in this country.  And we really don’t.  We have limits here on what we can say.

Only now I believe it’s time for everyone, in Canada , to wake up and put a stop to people trying to silence you because you might hurt their feelings, or because they are offended, or find whatever you saying distasteful.   You have every single right to voice your opinion, to speak your mind and to say what you want. As  long as you don’t call for violence against anyone.

We need to fight people who try to attack free speech.  We do this by using logic, reasoning and not be shamed or silenced by those who would silence our speech.

I sincerely hope the court system does the right thing and throws this case out with the trash, otherwise there could be serious repercussions for everyone, including those who would silence us.

Lawsuit story here:
http://www.cp24.com/mobile/news/class-action-lawsuit-filed-over-distribution-of-anti-gay-literature-at-pride-parade-1.3026515

New Mental Disorder Discovered- IVD

Bipolar Disorder1

 

I have discussions with people both online and in real life about current affairs, politics, activism, and more.     Many people are passionate about what they are discussing and as such, I really don’t mind when the discussion or debate gets heated.    If both people understand that the discussion or debate is just that, then you can have a heated debate without taking it personally.

However, many people out there are unable to cope with this idea and do take things personally.   And those people tend to be the worst.   Especially some of the commentators on social media sites.   Instead of saying something constructive or conducive to the debate or discussion at hand, they of course, resort to name calling or attacking someone for stating something they have every right to state.     And instead of being civilized they become these lunatics with an axe to grind.

After decades of being active online,  I can spot these people very easily.   They try to come off as some sort of moral authority on their opinion and attack someone by using slurs that sound racist and bigoted.   Then when you confront them they invariably turn their ire on you when you defend yourself or a friend  from them.   When that doesn’t work and their argument falls apart they then try to slander you to try to get you to move away from the topic at hand in hopes that you will defend yourself from their offensive and then finally claim victim status saying you are the aggressor while they are the poor victim.

This happens almost daily online with people.   They think that being offended by something they see online gives them the automatic moral right to attack people, and when they are defended against, they pretend to be victims of abuse online.    There are many people out there who do this.   I see many feminists, SJWs and liberals who do this.

New Disorder….??

This is what I call the Infantile Victim Disorder or IVD.   You get an IVD when you have a warped set of beliefs that cause you to believe there is a mysterious patriarchy made up of old white men out to get you.    Or that you think you are superior to the other person due to their body parts.  And even due to a skin tone that is not considered Caucasian.

Symptoms include,  being “triggered“.  Using the word Problematic,  and telling men they have male privilege or the other variant if you are a person of another color,  having white male privilege.

Other symptoms may include:   Obesity, Poverty, Neon color in hair, getting undressed in public to march against rape, yelling and spitting on men at university, submitting false rape claims, false reports of sexual assault.  Raping men.  Being the aggressor in domestic violence.  Lesbianism.

If you suspect you have IVD, please go see a psychiatrist immediately.     Usually sufferers of IVD also have Bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and project their issues and blame others for problems that don’t exist or are the cause of the sufferer’s own actions.

Toronto plans on Giving out Award for Racism

BLMTO
(Racist Black Lives Matter Group, stops Toronto Gay Pride Parade for 30 minutes in 2016)

The Black Lives Matter movement is a racist hate group and they are getting an award for it.    Yes you read that correctly.   The city of Toronto is planning on giving Black Lives Matter Toronto branch an award for “improving” race relations.

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-94296.pdf

This is what Liberal Progressives think is progressive.   By rewarding special interest groups if they scream and cry loud enough.   Much like a child throwing a tantrum and a parent gives in to keep them quiet.     So far, Toronto has been quiet, and has given in to their demands, much like anyone that the BLM group has gone to.   Including the most recent Pride Toronto.

The Pride Toronto disruption to the parade was an insult to all gay people.    The leaders in this branch were given the honor of leading the gay pride parade.   What did they do with that honor?   They spit in the face of gay people by disrupting the parade for 30 minutes and making idiotic demands which in this day an age sound like things they would have demanded in the era of the civil rights movement in the United States.     However, what these people fail to recognize is that, as the liberals and progressives like to say, “It’s 2016”.     Canada has never treated black people the way they got treated by our neighbors down south.     Canada has always been against slavery for example.  We helped free slaves by helping with the underground railroad and brought many of the former slaves here to live free.   We have had equal rights for decades, yet this group seems to think it’s the 40s USA where police beat down the black man and it’s all the white man’s fault.

What makes me angry about this whole thing is the way the city of Toronto city hall and other groups like the Pride Committee just give in to this group.  Why do they do this?  For fear of being called racist and non-inclusive themselves.    Their liberal white guilt and feminist ideology is to blame here.     It’s become so bad to speak out against real injustice and more ideal to gain the approval of their peers that they perform virtue signaling to the other liberals to show them how progressive and inclusive they are by going out of their way to make groups like the BLM happy, without truly thinking about the repercussions and examining what the BLM says.   One look at their facebook group page shows exactly their racist thinking and the divisiveness they promote among the races.

Remember BLM leader and her famous tweets about killing white people and men?    This is their leader and she promotes racism and sexism, and barely anyone called her out.   These people need to be shunned when they appear.   Treat them with the same respect you would to a neo nazi or white supremacist and then we can work on equality.

So Toronto, will you continue to pander to these children who have never faced real adversity in their lives or will you learn from your mistakes and face reality and stop awarding racist bigots for their work on dividing people instead of uniting people?

I’m gay and here is why I want gay people to be armed.

Guns

I wasn’t going to write about Gun Control because that debate has been and still is being beaten to death with lies and half truths being flung around.   Also with blame on the Orlando shooting being flung in many directions.

My perspective comes a as gay man who grew up in an era of hate against gays.   I was there in the 80s and 90s fighting for our rights while gay men were thrown off bridges, killed, beaten and raped while the police did nothing and turned a blind eye.    So with this perspective I can see all the views and how all of them are wrong and right.

The answer in all this is you cannot point to any one problem that caused this, but a bunch of problems that culminated into a massacre.

Let us look at the shooter himself.    This is the big factor here.   He was raised in a highly religious house with an overbearing and strict father who publicly has stated gays should be killed.  They should die etc.     Hard enough to live and grow up in a home with that being straight, but now throw in a guy who, turns out to be gay himself.   He tried pretending and it didn’t work.   He was unhappy and that unhappiness and upbringing told him he could be violent to women.    So he turned to the people that he felt he had something in common with.  Gay people.   He dated them, slept with them, hung out at gay bars with them for years.   That was his sanctuary, as it is for other gay men and lesbian women.

Then we look at the ideology of Islam.   Here is a quote from their Quran.

“Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to.” (in reference to the active and passive partners in gay sexual intercourse).

Or
“We also sent Lut : He said to his people : “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.” Qur’an 7:80-81

There are many more example and interpretations of this religion that I could cite page after page of quotes against us, but I won’t.   Here is a link though to one site that specifically talks about Islam and homosexuality…

http://www.missionislam.com/knowledge/homosexuality.htm

So now, if you put yourself in the shooters shoes you get an idea of the self hatred and guilt he was feeling.    Then you take in the fact they openly preach we should die in their mosques right here in North America and you get a problem.

Add in the background checks performed by the FBI and they purposely chose to allow this mentally disturbed individual to own a gun and you get what happened in Orlando.

Now here is the argument that many liberals in the United States and Canada are using.

 Ban Guns.  Guns kill people.    We will be safer.

I have a huge issue with this.  The issue is this assumes we will be safer without proof.   They will cite that there is less gun violence in Canada.  Oh wait… percentage wise no there isn’t.      They can’t do math.   You see Canada is  smaller population wise.   We have 10% of the population the USA has.   That means we have a 10th of the number of the crimes that the USA has.   And the stats actually back this up.    We have had our share of mass shootings and killings.

Then we hear the arguments that we shouldn’t blame all Muslims.    And I agree with this. However, what they fail to understand is that just because you don’t want radical Muslims to own guns or be allowed into the country, that you are somehow Islamophobic for wanting to stop these radicals from owning weapons or being allowed into a country.

They also like to ignore what is happening in other places in the world with the “It hasn’t happened, or can’t happen” here mentality.    Germany, Sweden, Australia and other westernized countries have a serious problem of Muslim rape gangs.   According to their religion it is okay to rape non Muslim women or women who are not married and protected by men.  In fact many Muslim men who have been questioned on this respond that they had no idea that what they did was against the law or bad.  In their faith, it is perfectly acceptable.

http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/02/does-islam-allow-muslims-to-rape-female.html

So the religion itself is pretty bad against gays and women and the liberals want to embrace this religion because “not all muslims”.    I really don’t care about the peaceful Muslim people.   The ones who live their lives beside me in peace.   My doctor is a Muslim woman and I’m a gay white man.    The problem I have is with the ones who follow that faith to the letter and want to kill me.

This comes to my other point.    We have a right to protect ourselves from anyone attacking us.     Liberals don’t think so.   They think that the only people that should be allowed to protect us is the government.     However, intelligent people understand that police don’t always show up on time, if they are even called.      Was the police called in the Orlando Shooting?   Yes.  Did they show up in time to stop the guy from killing 50 people and injuring another 50?   The answer is no.   It takes seconds to  stop a mass shooting as this video shows:

There are many other cases of this on YouTube.   You never hear about this because the Liberals would rather you not hear both sides of the argument.   They just want you helpless and dependent on others for your safety.

If one or two people at that Nightclub had been armed, the death toll would have been much smaller.

No population has ever been safe from being disarmed.    In those countries that have been, the rates of violent crimes have risen dramatically.   Including murder and rape.    If you know for a fact you won’t be shot by someone then your chance of survival from committing a horrible act goes up and therefor they have no fear in doing those crimes.   This brings me to…

Gun Free Zones argument…

They don’t work.   They just don’t.  In many of the mass shootings they were in Gun Free Zones like Sandy Hook etc.   If a person doesn’t care about killing you, then why would you honestly think a sign that says “gun free zone” would stop them?    It is an invitation to them.  They know that they have less if not no chance of someone shooting them back.   Yet the argument these work is patently idiotic.

Love beats Hate argument….

This one doesn’t work either.   We have tried that for all my life in Canada and there are still terrorists trying to kill us, people shooting people, and killing people.    What does work is defending oneself from an attacker.

Love doesn’t stop a bullet.  

With so many people out  there that want to kill me because of who I love in my life that honestly does cause fear for my safety and those around me.  My husband and I grew up in the era of constant threat of violence and while that threat went down dramatically over the decades I admit, I am still hated by many and as the Orlando shooting and Islam teaches Muslims, that we must be killed.    I and any other sane gay person or even women shouldn’t feel safe with that kind of threat hanging over our heads.

“Only a small number of Muslims” argument….

Do the math.   There is 1.6 Billion Muslims on the planet all over the world.  That is a huge portion of the planets population.      In Canada it 35% of the Muslim population agrees with the terrorists.      With  1,053,945 Muslims in Canada, and if 35% agree with the terrorists .. that means over 300, 112 Muslims want me dead.  And that is in my own country.

Canada[edit]

A newly released survey suggests a large number of Muslims living in Canada will not disown Al-Qaida.The study,[34] conducted by the MacDonald Laurier Institute, found 65% of Muslims questioned said they would “repudiate absolutely” the terrorist organization, while 35% would not do so.

“From a security perspective, it is difficult to know if a 65% rate of repudiation (of Al-Qaida) is re-assuring or a 35% failure to repudiate troubling,” wrote study authors Christian Leuprecht, associate professor of the Royal Military College of Canada and Conrad Winn, Carleton University professor and president of COMPAS, a public opinion research firm.
. . .

The report also states support for extremism is just as high among Muslims born in Canada, or other Western countries, as it is among those hailing from oppressive dictatorships.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Terrorism

So in closing, you have to decide for yourself if you need to arm yourself and protect yourself.  If you prefer to live in a world where you expect everyone else to protect you then that is your choice.   I know from experience and from reading history and seeing the bodies pile up on the news that this is not the case and we as gay people are  targets.  We need to protect ourselves.    You can’t hug away terrorism or terrorist acts.


Free Speech vs Hate Speech

I recently got into a debate on this (again), and for some reason people cannot fathom that hate speech laws are a form of censorship.     Worse yet.   We have the mayor of Ottawa Jim Watson, who has been in his office since the beginning of time, who openly now tweets and states that he is for the stiffing of speech because he finds it “vile”.

Mayors blast ‘pro-rape’ men’s meetings planned for Canadian cities

I tweeted him and stated that wanting to censor free speech is wrong, and he responded by calling me vile for supporting the guy  who wants to open a dialog about the rape laws.

Reasonable people understand that rape is bad.  We all know this.  No one condones rape.   The problem lies with the idea and definitions of rape.

Feminist supporters think rape can be this magical thing that can happen at any point.     Let me explain.

They (Liberals and Feminists) believe that (I’ve written about this before),

  1.  A man and a woman who BOTH get drunk, BOTH consent to sex and have sexual intercourse is rape.    Why?  A woman is apparently unable to consent while drunk.
  2. A woman who goes home with a strange man, gets drunk, takes drugs and gets naked, has sex with the strange man but doesn’t remember having sex has been raped.
  3. A woman who consents to having sex even when sober and then regrets the experience a week later, has been apparently been raped.

Do you notice the trend here?     Women are not responsible for their actions but men are despite being equal in things.

So this Return of Kings guy is calling for a debate and discussion about the rape laws if it occurs in your own home.

I get what he is saying and while I don’t agree entirely, with much of what he says, I understand that freedom of speech means being able to talk about things that people may find vile or abhorrent without repercussions from government.

As far as Mayor Jim Watson is concerned the idea of questioning the idea of rape laws is abhorrent.    This is the type of people in power and have been in power for a very long time.

I tweeted back the mayor stating the differences, that hate is the calling for 90% of men to be castrated or killed via the #killallmen hashtag.   Or the Drinking Male Tears meme which is common among rich white sorority girl feminists who do not understand basic concepts of freedom of speech.

Using these laws to shut down talk and discussion that you “FEEL” is wrong is not a valid reason.   Free Speech is a double edged sword.    I’m gay and I’ve heard the debate and discussion when gay marriage and even back when gays were not accepted as they are now.    I may not have liked what was being said but I never wanted to stop people from speaking their minds on subjects and having rational discussions.

Jim Watson, Justin Trudeau, if a woman or a man goes home with a stranger, and has spent a night flirting and implying they are interested in having sexual intercourse, and they go to either one’s home, get drunk or even not.    Get naked and have sex, and one party regrets it the next day, that is not rape.     Neither is it when you get drunk, and get naked in someone else’s bed.   That is called implied consent.   I know this concept is foreign to you but it is a real thing.    Penalizing someone for wanting to speak their mind on the subject or banning someone from speaking is called censorship.

And censorship is a form of oppression and hate.    Hate of true freedom.