New Mental Disorder Discovered- IVD

Bipolar Disorder1

 

I have discussions with people both online and in real life about current affairs, politics, activism, and more.     Many people are passionate about what they are discussing and as such, I really don’t mind when the discussion or debate gets heated.    If both people understand that the discussion or debate is just that, then you can have a heated debate without taking it personally.

However, many people out there are unable to cope with this idea and do take things personally.   And those people tend to be the worst.   Especially some of the commentators on social media sites.   Instead of saying something constructive or conducive to the debate or discussion at hand, they of course, resort to name calling or attacking someone for stating something they have every right to state.     And instead of being civilized they become these lunatics with an axe to grind.

After decades of being active online,  I can spot these people very easily.   They try to come off as some sort of moral authority on their opinion and attack someone by using slurs that sound racist and bigoted.   Then when you confront them they invariably turn their ire on you when you defend yourself or a friend  from them.   When that doesn’t work and their argument falls apart they then try to slander you to try to get you to move away from the topic at hand in hopes that you will defend yourself from their offensive and then finally claim victim status saying you are the aggressor while they are the poor victim.

This happens almost daily online with people.   They think that being offended by something they see online gives them the automatic moral right to attack people, and when they are defended against, they pretend to be victims of abuse online.    There are many people out there who do this.   I see many feminists, SJWs and liberals who do this.

New Disorder….??

This is what I call the Infantile Victim Disorder or IVD.   You get an IVD when you have a warped set of beliefs that cause you to believe there is a mysterious patriarchy made up of old white men out to get you.    Or that you think you are superior to the other person due to their body parts.  And even due to a skin tone that is not considered Caucasian.

Symptoms include,  being “triggered“.  Using the word Problematic,  and telling men they have male privilege or the other variant if you are a person of another color,  having white male privilege.

Other symptoms may include:   Obesity, Poverty, Neon color in hair, getting undressed in public to march against rape, yelling and spitting on men at university, submitting false rape claims, false reports of sexual assault.  Raping men.  Being the aggressor in domestic violence.  Lesbianism.

If you suspect you have IVD, please go see a psychiatrist immediately.     Usually sufferers of IVD also have Bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and project their issues and blame others for problems that don’t exist or are the cause of the sufferer’s own actions.

Advertisements

Gender Fluid theory is Garbage.

GF

To many people, they believe that gender fluid means that you can change your gender, like you can change your underwear.  The reality (truth) is that you can’t.    Gender is the description word we use to describe the sex of a person via pronouns.   “He” is the gender pronoun for a male.  “She” is the gender pronoun for a female.

The gender fluid idea not only dictates that you change your gender like you change your underwear, but that there must be a new gender pronouns created to describe these people.

Gender neutral pronouns have been created so people won’t offend their special snowflake friends.

Here is an example of made up, and in some cases unpronounceable pronouns:

Gender Pronouns.png

More of the garbage can be found here: http://uwm.edu/lgbtrc/support/gender-pronouns/

The problem with all this is simply the fact that people actually think, that changing your gender is the simply act of a way of thought or clothing.     The act of putting on a dress for a guy or bandaging up the breasts for a woman and putting on the opposite gender’s clothing means that they are the opposite sex.    It is not.   This is typically known as cross-dressing.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cross%E2%80%93dressing

I’ve heard the idea from the idiots who believe this nonsense that gender is based on your personality, and not your anatomy.    This is also untrue, since your anatomy dictates if your male or female.  Hence, why people say “Penis = Male” and “Vagina = Female”.

There are mentally ill people who think they are puppy dogs to and want to live out their lives as dogs or even other animals or even mythical creatures.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/may/25/secret-life-of-the-human-pups-the-men-who-live-as-dogs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3524063/Transgender-woman-Eva-Tiamat-Medusa-ears-nose-removed-dragon-lady.html

That brings me to trans-gendered people.   These people fall into the same category as the above.

These people suffer from a mental illness called “Gender Dysphoria”

These are people who are unhappy with their biological sex and believe they are the opposite sex.   That somehow, the doctor when they were born, didn’t recognize the proper gender and “assigned” them the wrong one.

Decades ago this was treated, successfully I might add, as a mental illness.  The treatment used to entail regular visits to a psychiatrist and medication.   It was believed that people who suffered from this illness had a chemical imbalance.    Then came the gay rights movement and feminism.      They cited that it was NOT a mental illness that gender is a social construct.    They convinced enough people, to re-examine the idea of the treatments, saying they are more harmful than helpful because it ignores the person’s feelings.     Remember folks, feeling over fact and science is precedence with these people.

Then doctors created the mutilation surgeries that are still to this day, really bad.  They allow people to voluntarily mutilate their bodies via cosmetic surgery in an effort to look like the opposite sex, while not being able to be biologically the opposite sex.

Let me explain.

You cannot change your DNA.   You cannot change your muscle structure.  You cannot change your skeletal structure.      So your body regardless of the surgery will still show up as your sex that you were born as.       This makes all those transgender surgeries under the category of cosmetic.

The worse part of it is that they are chopping off working body parts, and sewing on body parts that do not work as intended.   For example, a male undergoing a male to female surgery, will not have a working uterus, and no eggs.    So after the surgery she cannot bear children.    A female to male is worse.   In many cases the female decides to KEEP her uterus and have a penis sewn on.  Only the penis cannot produce sperm and needs a rod or a pump installed to inflate it to be able to have sex.   So technically it doesn’t work as functioning male either.   In many of the cases of the women who go through those surgeries and keep their uterus, they decide at some point to have a baby.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2416088/Transgender-German-man-Europe-baby-boy-following-home-birth.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=5302756&page=1

Transgender means that you are transitioning from one gender to another.  It doesn’t mean you can stay in that middle state and call yourself a man if you have a uterus.
Then the argument comes in that “Oh but the surgeries are expensive”.    Yes, well cosmetic surgeries usually are, because they do not add any value to health.  And are why they call them cosmetic.

And these people still are not happy after they go through with the surgeries.   In fact many regret doing it.  So much that they commit suicide in the same high numbers as they do before the surgeries.

http://www.sexchangeregret.com/

When you fight your own biology, you will lose.  You can’t change your gender.  It is scientifically an impossibility.    Feminist theory professors have an agenda.  Indoctrination into the cult of feminism.  They need to convince young minds that their theories are facts and due to the borg collective mentally of feminism,  many just believe this without question.

Don’t fall for the idea that Gender is fluid on anyone’s say so.  Challenge it.  Question it.   Dissect it.

Feminists try to get Documentary banned!

DSC01401-Version-2-800x445
(Image courtesy of original article: https://anongalactic.com/feminists-are-trying-to-shut-down-a-documentary-on-mens-rights/)

The documentary film, being created by feminist and filmmaker Cassie Jaye.    The film called “The Red Pill”, documents the Men’s Rights Right Movement and sheds the light on the issues that men face into today’s society.

Feminists of course, see this as an attack on them personally and want to shut it down.  As usual, when something is not about them or links feminism in a bad light, which this film points out how, when, why and how feminism has taught people to think that men are the boogy man and gives a glimpse to who the real bad guy is.

(Sneak Preview Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK7n_XA40V8 )

For decades, men have been fighting for men’s rights, but until now men’s voices have not been heard.   This film is a must see for anyone who wants to learn the truth about feminism and the Men’s rights movement.

Question you may want to ask yourself;

Do you know of a father who was denied custody to his children?
Do you know of a father who was denied custody to his children and the mother is abusive?
Do you know any man who has committed suicide?
Do you know any man who was homeless?

Do you know of a man who has been sent to jail for not paying child support because he couldn’t afford to?
Do you know of a man who was denied the right to be a father because the mother didn’t want to be a mother and got an abortion?

These are just some of the issues cover in the film.    I for one, think this film is due, and encourage everyone, feminist, MRA, or neutral to watch.

That is, if the feminists don’t shut it down.  After all, we can’t have free speech can we?

Feminism – A Hidden Hate Group

0

A hate group is an organized group or movement that advocates and practices hatred,hostility, or violence towards members of a race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation or other designated sector of society.

scum manifesto

Opening except from this novel:

“Life” in this “society” being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of “society” being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex.”

This feminist shot Andy Worhol.

Here are some quotes from some famous Feminists;

  • “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone“

    In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.” — Catherine MacKinnon

    “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart

Under the current definition of a hate group, feminism does fall under that category.   Mainstream society however, cannot see this, because they shrug off the radicals and being radicals and call for equality.   However, it is not.  It is for the superiority of women over men.   Period.

Femism is defined as :

: the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities

: organized activity in support of women’s rights and interests

This is the part that many, many people forget in the definition of the word feminism.  They forget the part that is for the support of women’s rights and interests.     So when they say that Feminism is about equality for all, they are absolutely wrong.   It is for the equality sure, but it is for women’s rights and interests.  NOT for men.

Women have it really nice in today’s society.   They get almost everything they want with very little effort, and even though they get things their way, they still are not happy.  The privileged little girls and boys coming out of university have been brainwashed by gender studies courses into believing theories that emasculate men, and confuse men and women and about their genders and what they perceive to be roles in society.

So really, if you are a feminist you are part of a hate group and should be ashamed.   If you are truly for equality for both genders then you are an Egalitarian.

A Scourge Is Spreading. Meninists Cure? Princess, Open Your Legs!.

‘Woman Spreading’ on New York Subways Is a Target of New Meninist. Campaign.

download (1)
It is the bane of many male subway and bus riders.  It is a scourge that is tracked on blogs and on Twitter.

And it has a name almost as distasteful as the practice itself.

It is womanspreading, the lay-it-all-out sitting style that more than a few women see as their inalienable public transportation right.

Now passengers who consider such inelegant female posture as infringing on their sensibilities – not to mention their share of subway space – have a new ally.  The Metropolitan Authority.

Taking on womanspreading for the first time, the authority is set to unveil public service ads that encourage women to share a little less of themselves in the city’s ever crowded subways and buses.

Targets of the campaign, those women who cross their legs, blocking aisles, or access to other seats, or by spreading out their belongings on empty seats, and refusing to move the bags when asked so no one else can sit down. can sometimes occupy two even three or four seats are not hard to find.  Whether they will heed the new ads is another question.

Riding the F train from Brooklyn to Manhattan on a recent afternoon, Emma C. Fitzsimmons 20, was unapologetic about sitting with her purse on the seat beside her or having her legs crossed which creates a tripping hazard.

“I’m not going to sit like a gentlmen does,”she said. “I’m going to sit how I want to sit.”

“And what if Mrs. Fitzsimmons, a writer from New York saw posters on the train asking her to place her bags on her lap? “I’d just laugh at the ad and hope that someone graffitis over it,” she said.

For Davidl Radcliffeson, an actor who confronts woman spreaders and tweets photos of them, his solitary shaming campaign now has the high powered help of the transportation authority, whose ads will be plastered inside subway cars.

“It drives me crazy, ” he said of women who cross their legs. “I find myself glaring at them because it just seems so inconsiderate in this really crowded city.”

When Mr. Radcliffeson, who lives in Brooklyn and is in his 30s, asks women to move, he siad, they rarely seem chastened: “I usually get grumbling or a complete refusal.”

incosiderate_girl_with_too_many_bags_taking_all_the_space_on_the_bus

The new ads – aimed at curbing rude behavior like womanspreading and carrying multiple bags on crowded trains – are set to go up in the subways next month.  They will carry the slogan, “Courtesy Counts: Manners Make a Better Ride.”
One of the posters is likely to be especially welcome to men – as well as the women who frown on womanspreading:”Princess…Stop The Spread, Please.” reads the caption next an image of riders forced to stand as a woman nearby sits so that her bags take up two seats.

The campaign is the latest in a long line of courtesy-themed crusades by the authority going back to at least the 1940s. One such ad urged men to “Hit, Her Again Dude, We don’t like Door-Blockers Either.”

The new ads come as more riders are crowding onto the subways than at any time in recent history. In 2014, the system logged as many as 6.1 million riders on a single day, up from under 5.1 million riders on the busiest day a decade ago.  The city’s population, meanwhile has swelled to more than 8.4 million people, pushing everyone closer and closer.

With crime no longer rampant on the subway, the campaign is the latest sign that other unwelcome behavior is getting attention.

bus-2  PRINCESS…STOP THE SPREAD, PLEASE (It’s a space issue)

Several blogs regularly highlight instances of womanspreading where bags are several feet apart.  On some sites, images of large objects like the Death Star from “Star Wars” have been added with photoshop into the space between the woman and her bags.  While there are men who take up more than their fair share of space, the offenders are usually women.

One admitted womanspreader, Emma Watson, sat with her legs crossed on an F train as it traveled through Manhattan recently.

“It’s more comfortable,” she said with a shrug and a hair flip.

Mrs. Watson, 21, Feminism advocate, who lives in New Jersey, said she might uncross her legs, but not just for anyone.  For an older person or a woman she would, and for an attractive man, she said, she definitely would. She said with a wink and a giggle.

Justienne Blubber shook his head when he saw two women sitting with their bags spread, taking up at least three seats between them.  Mrs. Blubber, 58, a clinical social worker, said he thought the women should move their bags, but she was not about to confront them.

4722.strollers2

“I’m not going to say, “Hey princess, there is a gentleman standing up right there.  Uncross your legs, princess.'” he said.

Men have theories about why some women sit this way.  Some believe it is just a matter of comfort and may not even be intentional.  Others consider it an assertion of power, or worse.

Brian Ellsworth, a 28 year old music teacher, views womanspreading as sexual harassment because some women engage in it near him even when the subway car is not packed.

“They could move over and cross their legs all they want,” he said, “but they’re squeezing next to me and doing it.”
For woman who think that sitting with their legs crossed is socially acceptable, manners experts say it is not.  Pam Poster, the author of the book “Essential Manners for Women” and great granddaughter of the etiquette guru Emilio Poster, said the proper way to women to sit is with the legs parallel and their bags on their laps or between their legs in a V shape.

“I’m baffled by people who do that kind of thing, who take other people’s space,” she said.

Olga Hansson, a director of the Manhattan’s Ladies Spa Janice Allen’s, put it more succinctly.” A true lady, doesn’t sit on the subway, she stands.

As for women who may worry that uncrossing their legs could hurt their femininity, doctors say that there is nothing to fear.  A half-hour train ride with legs uncrossed might raise ovarian temperatures, but not long enough to do any harm, said Dr. Maria Goldstein, director of the center for female reproductive medicine and microsurgery at New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center.

Philadelphia has a new etiquette campaign, too, with posters that say, “Bitch, it’s Rude.. Two Seats – Really?”

But Chris Geiger, a spokesman for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, said the campaign in the City of Womanly Love is aimed at passengers with bags on seats, not people crossing their legs to tightly.  Womanspreading, he said, may not be a “localized” problem in New York. “I know of many complaints that have come through customer service about womanspreading,” he said.  Transit officials in Chicago and Washington said the phenomenon is a major concern for riders in those cities as well.

In New York, the transportation authority went back and forth about what tone to take when tackling the topic, said Pauline Flower, the authority’s senior director for corporate and internal communications.  Officials knew it could be ripe for parody on late night television and blogs, and did not want their approach to be too snarky, but Mrs. Flower said she knew that the ads had to speak directly to the spreaders.

“I had them add the Princess part,” she said, “because I think, Bitch please.  Really?”

(Please note this article is a parody of the NYTimes article written on manspreading, which appeared on their website on December 20, 2014.   Original link here:  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/nyregion/MTA-targets-manspreading-on-new-york-city-subways.html?_r=0 ) 

Feel free to share the message of the SCOURGE of WomanSpreading!

Reply to a 2014 article titled ” 8 reasons why Feminism isn’t Anti-Male”.

Confused_baby

(Original article here:  http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-09-26/8-reasons-why-feminism-isnt-anti-male/ )

I ran across this article this morning and laughed at the total illogical and lies the article spewed forth in it’s listing of the reasons why feminists are not anti-feminist.

So here is my response to this idiot author named Tiffanie Drayton .   The author tries to reference Emma Watson’s idiotic speech to the UN council and mentions Patriarchy affecting men and women negatively (that’s a new one).   But I’ll skip over her opener because that isn’t the list she talks about.

  1. It is in no way hateful to strive to help someone carry the financial and economic burdens of a family. Patriarchal society has long made money-making the “job” of the man, even to the detriment of his own mental and physical health. For many of us, our financial predicament depends not only on how hard we work, but also upon numerous other factors like the global and even national economic climate. It is extremely burdensome to put all financial responsibilities of a household upon the shoulders of a single person — nearly impossible, even — especially during harsh economic downturns like the Great Depression and the 2008 crisis. Men are always more likely to commit suicide than women, but during the worst economic times, that gap widens with men committing suicide at 2-4 times the rate of their female counterparts. A 2014 study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, “Economic Suicides in the Great Recession in Europe and North America,” noted that suicide rates increased for people who experienced foreclosure, unemployment or were in debt. Financial and economic burdens are onerous and even dangerous — feminists know even men need help carrying the load.

Actually historically speaking, both men and women worked to make money for the household income.   Only the higher classes like middle and wealthy could afford to have the woman of the house not work outside the home.    And in the home the woman made all decisions and ran the household.  Down to the hiring, firing and managing the servants.   In poor households, both men and women split the work equal, doing jobs that each were suited to do.   Nothing has changed within that regard to today.   If anything even men who are the main breadwinners of a household will actually contribute to the house work and work outside the home to help alleviate the burden on his wife or loved one, which increases the direct burden on him after working 44 plus hours in a week.

And yes I agree with the sentiment that money is a huge factor is suicides.  It is also a big factor on divorce.

However the last sentence shows me that she doesn’t understand feminism.   Feminists don’t want the responsibility of helping the male.  Many keep their finances separate from the household income to ensure they have a nest egg for themselves.   Finances in a house is a complex issue and to be honest most of what she says in this statement is essentially correct, with only a few minor things wrong.     So I will move on to the next one.

2. Less gender binaries means more fun for everyone! In a culture riddled with extreme gender binaries, women can’t play sports or even laugh too loud and men can’t cuddle babies or cute, tiny animals. That is one heck of a boring existence. As society widens the definition of “manhood” and “womanhood,” more individuals are free to participate in activities that are typically gendered and restricted to only one group or the other. That means a man can feel equally comfortable baking a cake (a traditionally “feminine” role) as he would playing football and a woman can change a flat tire while wearing high heels. The dedication of past feminists has already helped shape our current society, where “Cake Boss,” a man who loves to bake cakes, is a celebrity and Danica Patrick, the first woman to win the NASCAR Sprint Cup, participates in a long-time male-dominated sport.

Okay women have always been able to play sports.  The idea that they couldn’t is moronic.  However, she is confusing (like most feminists),  the idea of not being allowed to play sports with compete with men in sports.      The reason we have men’s leagues and women’s leagues in sports is due to fact women cannot compete with men in physical sports like football, basketball, hockey, baseball, boxing, etc.    All these sports require a level of fitness that if they compete with men, they will lose.  Every single time.   Women are just built differently than men and they need to accept that.

The next part of the statement that “men should feel comfortable baking a cake” –  Men in general throughout history have been the cooks, chefs and bakers.    Traditionally they have even taken turns cooking in the home as well.    As for the flat tire comment, most women are not interested in car maintenance and would rather pay someone else to change their tire or oil.   All you have to do is look at shop classes in high schools and count the girls in the classes.   Generally men are more interested in the dirty work than women are.

Cake Boss was not created by feminists.   That sentence is laughable on it’s face.   The guy became what he is today from  hard work, and learning from his FATHER how to bake cakes and run a business, and if you watch the show his sisters can’t decorate or bake worth a damn and that’s why they handle the customers.  That isn’t feminism, that is a family run business, and the jobs are dictated by skill not gender.

. Feminism gives little boys the chance to be children first, and boys second. Feminists know and understand that both boys and girls have every right to be angry, frustrated, happy and even sad or empathetic: In other words, human. However, emotions that are typically classified as “feminine,” like nurturing, caring, sympathetic or sadness, are usually disallowed from boyhood expression. Statements like “boys don’t cry” and “be a man” further reinforce the idea that men and boys cannot and should not exhibit basic emotions — a very debilitating and even immature concept. Boys and men are human, not robotic, emotionless androids. Feminism seeks to help society get over that fact.

Now here again is something that a feminist is taking credit for, when in reality, little boys have always been allowed to cry or be kids. And in fact when you look at who is the primary caregivers in any given household you will find it is the woman, and if she works, the daycare worker who is most likely going to be a woman.  And a study was done a few years back that found that a child will be hit by the female caregiver 900 times in a year.   Since we know that women have primary care on the first 4 years of that child, that means they are beating on average 3600 times the child.   And this happens when the child cries or gets angry or shows emotion.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1983895,00.html

“Boys don’t cry” is saying from slavery.   When male slaves were referred to as Boy and got a worst punishment if they cried.   Has nothing to do with gender.

“Be a man”  is a saying that means “Be responsible”   It comes from the time, when men were 100% responsible financially responsible for their family.   So if their child broke a window playing ball, the father had to be a man and pay for that window.

The first term was from racism, and the second wasn’t derogatory.   While the first one did indeed restrict public emotions, the second doesn’t.  Society doesn’t need feminism to get over showing emotions.  In fact I know many men who do and feminists laugh and berate them and even hit them when they do.   See next image for example of a feminist who likes men showing emotion:

Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

4. Feminism has given men the freedom to be fathers. In the past, many children longed for a male figure in the house, but men were frequently absent because of their role as the breadwinner. With women confined to the domestic space — along with the children — and men locked outside in the working world, it was very difficult for strong bonds to be built between child and father.

Now, many working women are capable of supporting a household or are at least able to contribute financially, allowing men to spend more time with their children and less time working. Crucial bonds that have long been absent from Western culture are being forged between father and child in a modern, post-feminist society.

This statement is an outright lie and I call Bullshit on this.   Men have always been fathers to their children and feminism never gave men this.   In fact in poor households, with the men working as well as the women the kids had equal time with both parents.  As a family.

In today’s society, with the high divorce rates, women are being awarded custody of the children in the majority of divorces.  Many of those men only get to see their children one weekend a month (if they are lucky) and rotating holidays.    And that is with joint custody.  That doesn’t allow much time for fathers to be with their children, or be fathers.    Feminism did this.  Not only that but the women demand support payments and alimony from the ex husband and the home and the car and usually gets those as well in most divorces.  This forces the man to pay for the wife, children and to pay HER Bills while allowing her to keep her money and spend it as she wishes without the responsibility of spending that on her children.

This is one of the main causes why men end up in jail, because in a marriage if a person’s financial situation changes the house finances are adjusted to suit that change.  After a divorce settlement, if a man loses his job he is still expected to pay these costs or end up in jail.   This is another reason why we are seeing more men homeless and broke.  And as well others fleeing the country to avoid the prohibitive costs set by the courts, on behest of the woman.

In the rare cases where the father gets custody, the women at most is expected to pay a small amount in support and very rarely alimony to support the husband, simply because men are usually the bigger bread winners and it’s rare to find a woman who makes more money in her chosen field.

And not only that but women will get paid by the state, if she is a single mother and no father listed on the birth certificate.  In other words the mother has no idea who the father is so the state becomes the father.   As long as she has that kid, then the government will pay her for it.   Now granted a man will get that same treatment if they have custody and the mother isn’t in the picture but that is extremely rare.

5. Feminism helps to make straight sex better and healthier. The impact of societal policing of female sexuality affects everyone, including the men who women are sleeping with. Many women must deal with debilitating feelings of guilt, shame and anxiety induced by patriarchy’s constant need to dominate and diminish female minds and bodies, which ultimately has negative effects on their sexual self-esteem. Feminism has fought to create safe spaces where women can engage in discourse about sex and their personal experiences. This not only helps women to better understand their minds and bodies, but it also enables the exploration of sexual desire and gives them the confidence to speak openly to their partners. Better communication and understanding is helpful in all relationships, especially sexual ones.

This is rich.  We are a dimorphic species.   That means there are inherent, instinctual things that males and females do differently.  This has to do with our evolution of our genders.    In order to ensure men’s genetics were passed on, the males would attempt to impregnate as many females as possible.   The more females, the more virile the man appears and the more attractive the male was to females.   Women however, evolved slightly different.   Due to the chance of death in childbirth and complications during pregnancy, women had to be more careful on choosing a mate.

This is why men to this day seem to be more like sexual beings who are out to sleep with as many women as possible, while women feel guilt over sleeping with many men.    This is a type of built in evolutionary trait that is built within each gender.

As for the safe spaces comment .. I say FUCK YOU FEMINISM.   Men are not allowed to have men only safe spaces.   You protest and screech at the mention of men only places.    So BULLSHIT on that statement.   As for confidence in speaking to their spouses.  If you lack the confidence, then maybe you need  get some mental health professional to help you with that.  Confidence comes from within and is not a gender trait in any way shape or form.   That is a trait that is learned.  If all your hearing is men are rapists, men are violent and men are evil, then yes, women will have confidence issues when speaking with men, including any boyfriends or husbands.  That is the fault of FEMINISM, not men.

7. Feminism helps society care about things that affect the women men care about. Birth control, women’s reproductive health, the right to vote, access to education and employment are just some of the issues feminism has tackled. Feminists have also worked to protect women and girls from domestic violence, sexual harassment and sexual assault. Without the movement, the women who men love — daughters, mothers, sisters, friends, girlfriends, wives — would be voiceless and without legal or social protection.

No one has ever said men didn’t care about women or women’s issues.   Which is why your movement had garnered such huge support.   However, I notice you don’t include abuse shelters for abused men, or right to fatherhood for men, or sexual harassment against men, or sexual assault against men in your statement.   You know, the problems that have gotten progressively worse since feminists have gotten their way?   And women, have never been voiceless.  They have ALWAYS had support in law against the crimes you list.   Women however, get away with these crimes more than men and men suffer as a result, which helps contribute to the suicide rates and homelessness of men.

8. Improvement for women and girls equals improvement for everyone. Multiple studies on the socioeconomic impact of education on society have found that increases in female education attainment leads to higher levels of both economic and social development. Countries that focus on educating women and girls tend experience decreased infertility and infant mortality rates and increased GDPs. As best said by the World Bank’s lead education economist, Harry Patrinos, “the profitability of education, according to estimates of private rate of return, is indisputable, universal and global.” A study done by Cynthia Lloyd and Margaret Greene, (Girls Count: A Global Investment and Action Agenda) with just one extra year of education to women and girls, their wages increased from 10-20 percent. These improvements benefit not only females, but also their families and society as a whole since money is typically reinvested (in the form of purchases) into the community.

Citation needed.     No actually statistics show that women are becoming more violent and men are opting out of marriage more.  Education is geared to get women into university into stem fields but women are not CHOOSING those fields.  Instead they choose courses that are easier and help them get careers in jobs that allow them the flexibility of scheduling and safety, over those that men get into which take them away from family more and are more dangerous to make more money.

In fact, less men are able to attend university due the fact they get no financial incentives or free rides.  Women get grants, loans and many other incentives to get into college and university.   That isn’t improvement.  It is oppression.

In closing I’m going to say this. Feminists are fucking idiots, with no concept that they are harming men, and women with their viewpoints and beliefs.   In no way shape or form is the oppression of men’s rights equality.