2015 Top Ten List Fails for Feminists

TopTen

2015 saw many fails for Feminists.  This is my list of my favorite top 10 of their fails (some carried over from 2014), and in my opinion, why feminism is fighting a loosing battle.

10. #Manspreading Campaign

This campaign was was designed to “shame” (Hypocrites) men into closing their legs to give room to women who want to sit down on public transportation in NYC.    This short lived campaign was started by some over privileged white college student women, who had nothing better to do, than harass men on the subway.

The campaign garnered notoriety and was in the papers.  The people who ran the subway system decided to make this a courtesy rule and put up signs in their subway trains.    This resulted in the arrest of 2 men after midnight who were on an almost empty train but because their legs were spread got arrested.   The cases of course were thrown out of court by a sensible judge, and after that the campaign to attack men for “spreading” their legs to far, was done.

9.  Potty Mouth Princess Campaign

pic-22

Nothing says equality than using little girls to push a political agenda by swearing at their elders, specifically male elders.   The FCKH8 campaign was short lived and garnered huge amounts of criticism from everyone, including some prominent feminists.    This of course didn’t stop the makers of the campaign, because in their eyes, any publicity is good publicity, so they stepped it up a notch to fight domestic abuse …

fckh8-part-two-hed-2014

Of course when a child is beaten black and blue like the princess above, we call this child abuse, and putting them on posters is called exploitation, but hey, it’s okay because it’s feminism and for a cause.   Huge fail.

#8.  Anita and that other chick whining to the UN. 

Anita whatsherdonkeyface, and the other one decided to go to the UN to fight against online cyber bullying.   After they presented their speech, they actually made feminism look even worse and helped turn the tide of women going against feminism.

Their best argument for censorship on the internet was people having a different opinion than theirs, not being allowed to block or report people who have a different opinion than theirs and best of all, anyone who isn’t a feminist to be censored.

#7.  #BanBossy

The concept of this campaign was to again “shame” people for using the word bossy when it comes to women.    Some people are bossy but according to feminists, women are not bossy, just expressing themselves.  Cause you know… feminist can’t ever be bossy.
angry-feminist

#6 Free The Nipple!

According to feminists, this is a big button issue that needed to be addressed.   They wanted to be able to post photos online of their bare breasts but also be able to walk around in public bare chested.

This was one of my favorites because I know a bunch of feminists in my area who thought this was great and supported it.   And I pointed out that they can legally go out bare chested, that nothing was stopping them from doing so in Ontario.       They’re response was to of course blame men for their insecurities of walking around bare chested.   I asked why, they would respond in the typical manner that “I don’t want to be stared at” or “I don’t want to be sexualized”.  (Usually from the hideous women who drink Ben and Jerry’s Ice Cream for breakfast)…  And I pointed out that if they (women), walked around bare chested more often then it would be common place and no one would blink twice at it.     And ,… this is when their argument falls flat .   Fail.

#5.  Shirtgate

A scientist successfully landed a rover remotely on a moving comet for the first time in human history.    That should have been celebrated by everyone, but feminists with less than half a brain attacked the man due to the fact he was wearing a shirt that they found offensive, due to the fact there was scantily clad on the shirt.     It didn’t matter that the shirt was made by a woman friend of the scientist who created the shirt for him as a present and is a feminist herself.   Nope.   They again pulled out the “shame” tactic and had the poor man in tears on national television apologizing for the shirt, tarnishing his great achievement.

#4.  Rape Culture

A movie that came out a few years back called “rape culture” caught the attention of feminists who jumped on the idea that we live in a society that actively promotes rape and protects rape.

This idea however, fails completely when looked at logically and by the stats and as well, as by looking at reality.

Western society doesn’t promote rape, it demonizes it.   So much that even the flimsiest accusation can ruin a man’s life.

In fact in western society, we have less than a percent of a percent of rape crime in our society.    Men are given long sentences if convicted of rape.

That brings me to …

#3 Cosby

This one is still going on even though the media controversy started in 2014.    Apparently Cosby should be tried for rape on hazy recollections and no proof from almost 40 years ago.

According to feminists, it doesn’t matter, the victim should be treated as if she is telling the truth, regardless of lack of evidence or facts.   Ignore the fact the women admitted to drinking and doing hard drugs at the time of their alleged rapes with Cosby.

According to the feminists, a rape victim shouldn’t have to prove the guy raped them, the guy should be proving his innocence.

In other words, let’s take all responsibility off the plaintiff and put it all on the defense.

Thankfully as of last month Cosby has decided to sue the women for defamation of character.    Good Luck Mr. Cosby.

#2 Air Conditioners are Sexist! gxfHjJl

According to this so called “journalist” for the Guardian Newspaper in the UK, air conditioners are sexist against women.    Due to a study that showed that women feel cold more keenly than men.   So when the office air conditioner is on, it should be, according to her, turned down to a comfort level for the women in the office and let the men sweat.

This whole thing went world wide and people laughed and thought this was a joke until they realized it was a serious topic and so many people took this as another notch in how feminists make themselves look utterly idiotic.

#1 Gamergate

b4a

Yes this is still happening and has been talked about, almost nonstop all year in the gaming community.   Feminists constantly and consistently make themselves look like complete morons with this.

In case you don’t know what this is about…

It started as the people in the gaming community, complained on how there was no neutrality in the journalism when it came to games.   And they were right.   A gamer will get a constant barrage of reviews that praise this game or that game and nary a negative review happens.   This is due to the fact the game developers pay these people to write positive reviews.     This is called a paid endorsement.    Many articles in newspapers and magazines are paid endorsements and you don’t even realize it.

This really didn’t get any controversy until Anita Sarkesian and her chummy “I am a feminist” male writer buddies decided to make this a commentary against women.   And so a campaign was launched by her and her reviewer friends to discredit the gamers who complained.

This had nothing to do with sexism in gaming or feminism in reality.   It was to protect their cash cow.   Can’t have their audience criticizing their sources of income after all.

They hid this under a veil of feminism and sexism in gaming by gamers and the developers, in an effort to divert the attention away from themselves.    They realized during this campaign that the developers would bow under pressure of the pen so they would attack anything and anyone in gaming, citing sexism.   From the lack of female lead characters, to flimsy female outfits, to violence against women in games.

They did convince a small few at the beginning.   The HoneyBadgers for instance had been ejected from Com-icon when a feminist complained about the content of the comics being displayed at the com-icon both by HoneyBadgers. (Women by the way).

Then things heated up when they demanded women superhero characters (even though there are thousands in the comic books), and so companies like Disney (who bought marvel) announced they were making Thor female.   (The Norse God of Thunder).   And wonder woman got a new outfit that covered her more but still made her look feminine.

This enraged some of the geeks and nerds out there who rightfully complained about the buckling under the pressure from the feminists who until this past year, didn’t complain about this before (These characters have been around for over 50 years).

To this day gamergate is still going but has lost much of it’s momentum because the feminists have been making themselves look bad with every new demand.

_____________________________________________________

Anyway, that is my list.    If you think there is a feminist fail that should be on the list feel free to comment below.

Cheers!

 

Advertisements

Facing reality is a trigger for some people….

cosmic-dust

Today I got into an argument with some SJW’s on Facebook who actually were praising someone, and condemning anyone who spoke negatively about the man.   The whole thing started with news reports of a train hitting a tow truck that was parked on railroad tracks in between signal lights and those arms that come down when a train is approaching. In other words, right on the tracks.

(Original story here:  http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/10/30/1-dead-after-go-train-hits-tow-truck.html )

The tow truck driver had parked his car at a scene of a collision and was directing traffic to “be safe”. Unaware he had parked his tow truck right on the tracks.    Then ten minutes after arriving, a train was coming.

Now common sense screams that you move away from the parked truck.    No, this guy ran to his truck and got in, in an futile notion to move it off the tracks.  However, the truck was blocked by those arms that drop to stop traffic when trains approach, and so the guy didn’t even have time to get out and the train collided with the truck, killing the driver.

Thankfully, the passengers on that train were unharmed.   Shaken for sure, but unharmed.

Now, back to social justice warriors.    The made a derogatory comment about some firefighter who on his own personal social media account has stated the tow truck driver was an idiot for parking on the tracks.    The SJWs were making statements that  the firefighter should be fired etc.   (Cause, you know, we can’t have free speech).

I decided to jump in and give my two cents, (because I exercise my free speech as you all know).   My first volley in the comments was the firefighter is right.   This was a completely avoidable situation and the driver was an idiot for not using common sense.   Every single person knows not to park on railroad tracks.    Every year people die from being on railroad tracks, but of course this was the wrong answer.    The person who posted stated that a person who works as a firefighter should not be making statements that are negative and was ignorant for doing so.

First and foremost anyone who uses the word ignorant in that context is not understanding what that word means.  It actually means you are not educated on subject, typically the subject your speaking on  etc.    And I would say, that the firefighter is more qualified to say it than some housewife/social justice warrior, since fire fighter are high trained and are typically first respond-er to crisis situations.    And I said so.

This was when things got interesting and typical.  Her friends decided to jump in and defend the housewife’s comment and again called for the firefighter to be fired.  Simply because he said something they perceived as negative.   However the friend added by calling me a derogatory name and telling me Karma will bite me on the ass for saying something negative against the dead.

Reality of the situation of the truck driver is this.   He chose to park on the tracks, in between the arms, instead of somewhere safe.  By doing this he put every single person on that trains life at risk, and possibly cause derailment, death and destruction.

Instead we got lucky and only one person died from this event that was avoidable.

The idea that we can’t talk realistically about situations is wrong.   I will never stop talking the truth, and I refuse to wear rose colored glasses.   The housewife in question is also a mom of 5 kids.  So of course she had to bring that up and stated that she didn’t want her kids to have to live in a world with negativity, and then in typical fashion she unfriended me.   Now in their defense, I had enough of this nonsense because the idiocy of their commentary was astounding because it put zero blame on the tow truck driver, and when the name calling started I finished it by calling the one friend of the housewife what she was in reality, a Cunty Bitch.

in their world, it’s full of precious snowflakes, and unicorns and nothing ever goes wrong and when someone points out reality, they get mad, stomp their little feet, and cry.

Spoiled children.

Feminism – A Hidden Hate Group

0

A hate group is an organized group or movement that advocates and practices hatred,hostility, or violence towards members of a race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation or other designated sector of society.

scum manifesto

Opening except from this novel:

“Life” in this “society” being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of “society” being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex.”

This feminist shot Andy Worhol.

Here are some quotes from some famous Feminists;

  • “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone“

    In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.” — Catherine MacKinnon

    “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart

Under the current definition of a hate group, feminism does fall under that category.   Mainstream society however, cannot see this, because they shrug off the radicals and being radicals and call for equality.   However, it is not.  It is for the superiority of women over men.   Period.

Femism is defined as :

: the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities

: organized activity in support of women’s rights and interests

This is the part that many, many people forget in the definition of the word feminism.  They forget the part that is for the support of women’s rights and interests.     So when they say that Feminism is about equality for all, they are absolutely wrong.   It is for the equality sure, but it is for women’s rights and interests.  NOT for men.

Women have it really nice in today’s society.   They get almost everything they want with very little effort, and even though they get things their way, they still are not happy.  The privileged little girls and boys coming out of university have been brainwashed by gender studies courses into believing theories that emasculate men, and confuse men and women and about their genders and what they perceive to be roles in society.

So really, if you are a feminist you are part of a hate group and should be ashamed.   If you are truly for equality for both genders then you are an Egalitarian.

Dress Codes and Fashion Choices.

Business

I was on Facebook and someone had shared someone else’s post a sign that really got to me.  I thought about that sign and realized that the kids in schools don’t understand nor do they care or or simply not being taught anymore about a “time and a place” rule.   Instead they rally behind the “I want, want want” cry whenever they want something without thinking about if it is really appropriate or not.   Now I understand kids will usually take the opposite stance and get their hackles up, which is normal teen behavior.  This is why parents need to step up and explain what clothing is appropriate to certain situations.

Take the above photo.  That is clothing appropriate to an office environment.  Professional people who wear appropriate clothing in the work place.   Sane people understand this and understand that wearing clothing that is meant for beaches, is not appropriate for an office.   Like these outfits:

Crazy-sell-2015-Men-Women-Beach-Swimwear-Lovers-Couple-Swimming-Sport-Wear-Beach-Shorts-top-quality

This is what the currently crop of people and feminists are screaming about.  They want to wear clothing meant for summer and beaches to places of work and education.

Then there is the other problem with the post I had read.  Here is the image so you can understand.

11836731_1640955776161097_1502715658279897919_n

In case you can’t read it here is what it says

“When you INTERRUPT a girls school day to for her to CHANGE CLOTHES, or SEND HER HOME, because her shorts are too SHORT or her BRA STRAPS are VISIBLE, YOU are telling her that making sure BOYS have a “DISTRACTION FREELEARNING ENVIRONMENT is MORE IMPORTANT THAN HER EDUCATION.

INSTEAD OF SHAMING GIRLS FOR THEIR BODIES, TEACH BOYS THAT GIRLS ARE NOT SEXUAL OBJECTS. ”

I will break down the problems with this type of thinking.

  1.  This is the most important one.    This type of thinking disregards boys.  It tells them that girl’s rights to wear clothing they want, is more important than their education,  by NOT giving boys a distraction free environment.

2.  It ignores the fact that there are reasons why clothing that is revealing is inappropriate, and tells girls it’s perfectly okay to wear what you want no matter where you are.    You wouldn’t wear a bikini at a funeral or at an office, so it doesn’t make sense why you would wear hot pants and a bikini top to school, but this is what these kids want.

3.   It doesn’t prepare them for the real world or even University.   When they get to University they are considered or used to be considered adults and as such they will be treated as such and wearing inappropriate clothing to a class could have serious problems.

4.  This places responsibility on the men.   Men have eyes and are visually stimulated.  Women get angry with the boyfriends or husbands when the guy looks at another woman.  Even for a few seconds, and now they expect them not to look when girls are showing to much skin in a place that they are supposed to be learning for their future.

I’m going to approach the idea from a different angle.    If your so worried about wearing what you want to a place of learning then maybe your not focused on the right direction.  Maybe, just maybe you should focus on your education and not worry about fighting dress codes.

Wear black somber clothes at funerals

Wear scrubs when working in a medical environment

Wear Suits to offices

Wear swimwear to go swimming.

Clothing appropriate attire for appropriate occasions.

When is it okay to hit a woman?

man-hitting-woman

The answer is pretty simple but many women would disagree.    When a woman hits you, you hit back.     Violence is always wrong, but we as human beings have the right to defend ourselves from violence, even if that means using the same violence on our attacker.

Many woman, and I mean most women have used the idea of “It’s never okay to hit a woman” as a tool to be able to hit men.
Let’s first look at how that concept of “It’s never okay to hit a woman” idea came about.     We have to go back, to a time when women were thought of as the “weaker” sex.   Or rather, when everyone thought of them as the weaker sex.    We as men and even women considered it the men’s job to protect the women.  To this day, many women and men hold to this standard.

The problem now arises with feminists, and other women who claim that they can do anything a man can do, but better.  The women who claim they don’t need a man to protect them, or even the social justice warriors.

Society is now getting mixed messages.    We are taught (By woman) in our lives, that woman are strong and don’t need protection, and at the same time we are taught that it is never okay to hit a woman because she should be protected.

In today’s society, domestic abuse is roughly 50/50.   Men being the victims as much as women.   There are also millions of cases where women think it’s okay to slap a man for saying something they didn’t like, throwing things at a man when they get angry at them, or even destroy or damage property when they get angry.    Yet according to society and what we are taught since birth, we are not supposed to defend ourselves from these violent attacks if they are perpetrated by someone female.

woman-hitting-man-2915823

Enough is enough I say.   This type of thinking in our society creates a wrong message to the following generations.   If women want to be treated equally then they need to understand that having a vagina, does not give them free reign to hit men.    Men, if a woman hits you, then hit them back.   Defend yourself.   More men have died from domestic abuse than women have, simply because they have been under the belief that you shouldn’t hit a woman, even in self defense.    This is a societal construct that needs to be changed.

Ladies, if you hit a man, or anyone, expect to be hit back.   You cannot walk around hitting people period.

So to answer my original question….  If a woman hits you… HIT THEM BACK!

A Scourge Is Spreading. Meninists Cure? Princess, Open Your Legs!.

‘Woman Spreading’ on New York Subways Is a Target of New Meninist. Campaign.

download (1)
It is the bane of many male subway and bus riders.  It is a scourge that is tracked on blogs and on Twitter.

And it has a name almost as distasteful as the practice itself.

It is womanspreading, the lay-it-all-out sitting style that more than a few women see as their inalienable public transportation right.

Now passengers who consider such inelegant female posture as infringing on their sensibilities – not to mention their share of subway space – have a new ally.  The Metropolitan Authority.

Taking on womanspreading for the first time, the authority is set to unveil public service ads that encourage women to share a little less of themselves in the city’s ever crowded subways and buses.

Targets of the campaign, those women who cross their legs, blocking aisles, or access to other seats, or by spreading out their belongings on empty seats, and refusing to move the bags when asked so no one else can sit down. can sometimes occupy two even three or four seats are not hard to find.  Whether they will heed the new ads is another question.

Riding the F train from Brooklyn to Manhattan on a recent afternoon, Emma C. Fitzsimmons 20, was unapologetic about sitting with her purse on the seat beside her or having her legs crossed which creates a tripping hazard.

“I’m not going to sit like a gentlmen does,”she said. “I’m going to sit how I want to sit.”

“And what if Mrs. Fitzsimmons, a writer from New York saw posters on the train asking her to place her bags on her lap? “I’d just laugh at the ad and hope that someone graffitis over it,” she said.

For Davidl Radcliffeson, an actor who confronts woman spreaders and tweets photos of them, his solitary shaming campaign now has the high powered help of the transportation authority, whose ads will be plastered inside subway cars.

“It drives me crazy, ” he said of women who cross their legs. “I find myself glaring at them because it just seems so inconsiderate in this really crowded city.”

When Mr. Radcliffeson, who lives in Brooklyn and is in his 30s, asks women to move, he siad, they rarely seem chastened: “I usually get grumbling or a complete refusal.”

incosiderate_girl_with_too_many_bags_taking_all_the_space_on_the_bus

The new ads – aimed at curbing rude behavior like womanspreading and carrying multiple bags on crowded trains – are set to go up in the subways next month.  They will carry the slogan, “Courtesy Counts: Manners Make a Better Ride.”
One of the posters is likely to be especially welcome to men – as well as the women who frown on womanspreading:”Princess…Stop The Spread, Please.” reads the caption next an image of riders forced to stand as a woman nearby sits so that her bags take up two seats.

The campaign is the latest in a long line of courtesy-themed crusades by the authority going back to at least the 1940s. One such ad urged men to “Hit, Her Again Dude, We don’t like Door-Blockers Either.”

The new ads come as more riders are crowding onto the subways than at any time in recent history. In 2014, the system logged as many as 6.1 million riders on a single day, up from under 5.1 million riders on the busiest day a decade ago.  The city’s population, meanwhile has swelled to more than 8.4 million people, pushing everyone closer and closer.

With crime no longer rampant on the subway, the campaign is the latest sign that other unwelcome behavior is getting attention.

bus-2  PRINCESS…STOP THE SPREAD, PLEASE (It’s a space issue)

Several blogs regularly highlight instances of womanspreading where bags are several feet apart.  On some sites, images of large objects like the Death Star from “Star Wars” have been added with photoshop into the space between the woman and her bags.  While there are men who take up more than their fair share of space, the offenders are usually women.

One admitted womanspreader, Emma Watson, sat with her legs crossed on an F train as it traveled through Manhattan recently.

“It’s more comfortable,” she said with a shrug and a hair flip.

Mrs. Watson, 21, Feminism advocate, who lives in New Jersey, said she might uncross her legs, but not just for anyone.  For an older person or a woman she would, and for an attractive man, she said, she definitely would. She said with a wink and a giggle.

Justienne Blubber shook his head when he saw two women sitting with their bags spread, taking up at least three seats between them.  Mrs. Blubber, 58, a clinical social worker, said he thought the women should move their bags, but she was not about to confront them.

4722.strollers2

“I’m not going to say, “Hey princess, there is a gentleman standing up right there.  Uncross your legs, princess.'” he said.

Men have theories about why some women sit this way.  Some believe it is just a matter of comfort and may not even be intentional.  Others consider it an assertion of power, or worse.

Brian Ellsworth, a 28 year old music teacher, views womanspreading as sexual harassment because some women engage in it near him even when the subway car is not packed.

“They could move over and cross their legs all they want,” he said, “but they’re squeezing next to me and doing it.”
For woman who think that sitting with their legs crossed is socially acceptable, manners experts say it is not.  Pam Poster, the author of the book “Essential Manners for Women” and great granddaughter of the etiquette guru Emilio Poster, said the proper way to women to sit is with the legs parallel and their bags on their laps or between their legs in a V shape.

“I’m baffled by people who do that kind of thing, who take other people’s space,” she said.

Olga Hansson, a director of the Manhattan’s Ladies Spa Janice Allen’s, put it more succinctly.” A true lady, doesn’t sit on the subway, she stands.

As for women who may worry that uncrossing their legs could hurt their femininity, doctors say that there is nothing to fear.  A half-hour train ride with legs uncrossed might raise ovarian temperatures, but not long enough to do any harm, said Dr. Maria Goldstein, director of the center for female reproductive medicine and microsurgery at New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center.

Philadelphia has a new etiquette campaign, too, with posters that say, “Bitch, it’s Rude.. Two Seats – Really?”

But Chris Geiger, a spokesman for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, said the campaign in the City of Womanly Love is aimed at passengers with bags on seats, not people crossing their legs to tightly.  Womanspreading, he said, may not be a “localized” problem in New York. “I know of many complaints that have come through customer service about womanspreading,” he said.  Transit officials in Chicago and Washington said the phenomenon is a major concern for riders in those cities as well.

In New York, the transportation authority went back and forth about what tone to take when tackling the topic, said Pauline Flower, the authority’s senior director for corporate and internal communications.  Officials knew it could be ripe for parody on late night television and blogs, and did not want their approach to be too snarky, but Mrs. Flower said she knew that the ads had to speak directly to the spreaders.

“I had them add the Princess part,” she said, “because I think, Bitch please.  Really?”

(Please note this article is a parody of the NYTimes article written on manspreading, which appeared on their website on December 20, 2014.   Original link here:  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/nyregion/MTA-targets-manspreading-on-new-york-city-subways.html?_r=0 ) 

Feel free to share the message of the SCOURGE of WomanSpreading!

Reply to a 2014 article titled ” 8 reasons why Feminism isn’t Anti-Male”.

Confused_baby

(Original article here:  http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-09-26/8-reasons-why-feminism-isnt-anti-male/ )

I ran across this article this morning and laughed at the total illogical and lies the article spewed forth in it’s listing of the reasons why feminists are not anti-feminist.

So here is my response to this idiot author named Tiffanie Drayton .   The author tries to reference Emma Watson’s idiotic speech to the UN council and mentions Patriarchy affecting men and women negatively (that’s a new one).   But I’ll skip over her opener because that isn’t the list she talks about.

  1. It is in no way hateful to strive to help someone carry the financial and economic burdens of a family. Patriarchal society has long made money-making the “job” of the man, even to the detriment of his own mental and physical health. For many of us, our financial predicament depends not only on how hard we work, but also upon numerous other factors like the global and even national economic climate. It is extremely burdensome to put all financial responsibilities of a household upon the shoulders of a single person — nearly impossible, even — especially during harsh economic downturns like the Great Depression and the 2008 crisis. Men are always more likely to commit suicide than women, but during the worst economic times, that gap widens with men committing suicide at 2-4 times the rate of their female counterparts. A 2014 study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, “Economic Suicides in the Great Recession in Europe and North America,” noted that suicide rates increased for people who experienced foreclosure, unemployment or were in debt. Financial and economic burdens are onerous and even dangerous — feminists know even men need help carrying the load.

Actually historically speaking, both men and women worked to make money for the household income.   Only the higher classes like middle and wealthy could afford to have the woman of the house not work outside the home.    And in the home the woman made all decisions and ran the household.  Down to the hiring, firing and managing the servants.   In poor households, both men and women split the work equal, doing jobs that each were suited to do.   Nothing has changed within that regard to today.   If anything even men who are the main breadwinners of a household will actually contribute to the house work and work outside the home to help alleviate the burden on his wife or loved one, which increases the direct burden on him after working 44 plus hours in a week.

And yes I agree with the sentiment that money is a huge factor is suicides.  It is also a big factor on divorce.

However the last sentence shows me that she doesn’t understand feminism.   Feminists don’t want the responsibility of helping the male.  Many keep their finances separate from the household income to ensure they have a nest egg for themselves.   Finances in a house is a complex issue and to be honest most of what she says in this statement is essentially correct, with only a few minor things wrong.     So I will move on to the next one.

2. Less gender binaries means more fun for everyone! In a culture riddled with extreme gender binaries, women can’t play sports or even laugh too loud and men can’t cuddle babies or cute, tiny animals. That is one heck of a boring existence. As society widens the definition of “manhood” and “womanhood,” more individuals are free to participate in activities that are typically gendered and restricted to only one group or the other. That means a man can feel equally comfortable baking a cake (a traditionally “feminine” role) as he would playing football and a woman can change a flat tire while wearing high heels. The dedication of past feminists has already helped shape our current society, where “Cake Boss,” a man who loves to bake cakes, is a celebrity and Danica Patrick, the first woman to win the NASCAR Sprint Cup, participates in a long-time male-dominated sport.

Okay women have always been able to play sports.  The idea that they couldn’t is moronic.  However, she is confusing (like most feminists),  the idea of not being allowed to play sports with compete with men in sports.      The reason we have men’s leagues and women’s leagues in sports is due to fact women cannot compete with men in physical sports like football, basketball, hockey, baseball, boxing, etc.    All these sports require a level of fitness that if they compete with men, they will lose.  Every single time.   Women are just built differently than men and they need to accept that.

The next part of the statement that “men should feel comfortable baking a cake” –  Men in general throughout history have been the cooks, chefs and bakers.    Traditionally they have even taken turns cooking in the home as well.    As for the flat tire comment, most women are not interested in car maintenance and would rather pay someone else to change their tire or oil.   All you have to do is look at shop classes in high schools and count the girls in the classes.   Generally men are more interested in the dirty work than women are.

Cake Boss was not created by feminists.   That sentence is laughable on it’s face.   The guy became what he is today from  hard work, and learning from his FATHER how to bake cakes and run a business, and if you watch the show his sisters can’t decorate or bake worth a damn and that’s why they handle the customers.  That isn’t feminism, that is a family run business, and the jobs are dictated by skill not gender.

. Feminism gives little boys the chance to be children first, and boys second. Feminists know and understand that both boys and girls have every right to be angry, frustrated, happy and even sad or empathetic: In other words, human. However, emotions that are typically classified as “feminine,” like nurturing, caring, sympathetic or sadness, are usually disallowed from boyhood expression. Statements like “boys don’t cry” and “be a man” further reinforce the idea that men and boys cannot and should not exhibit basic emotions — a very debilitating and even immature concept. Boys and men are human, not robotic, emotionless androids. Feminism seeks to help society get over that fact.

Now here again is something that a feminist is taking credit for, when in reality, little boys have always been allowed to cry or be kids. And in fact when you look at who is the primary caregivers in any given household you will find it is the woman, and if she works, the daycare worker who is most likely going to be a woman.  And a study was done a few years back that found that a child will be hit by the female caregiver 900 times in a year.   Since we know that women have primary care on the first 4 years of that child, that means they are beating on average 3600 times the child.   And this happens when the child cries or gets angry or shows emotion.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1983895,00.html

“Boys don’t cry” is saying from slavery.   When male slaves were referred to as Boy and got a worst punishment if they cried.   Has nothing to do with gender.

“Be a man”  is a saying that means “Be responsible”   It comes from the time, when men were 100% responsible financially responsible for their family.   So if their child broke a window playing ball, the father had to be a man and pay for that window.

The first term was from racism, and the second wasn’t derogatory.   While the first one did indeed restrict public emotions, the second doesn’t.  Society doesn’t need feminism to get over showing emotions.  In fact I know many men who do and feminists laugh and berate them and even hit them when they do.   See next image for example of a feminist who likes men showing emotion:

Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

4. Feminism has given men the freedom to be fathers. In the past, many children longed for a male figure in the house, but men were frequently absent because of their role as the breadwinner. With women confined to the domestic space — along with the children — and men locked outside in the working world, it was very difficult for strong bonds to be built between child and father.

Now, many working women are capable of supporting a household or are at least able to contribute financially, allowing men to spend more time with their children and less time working. Crucial bonds that have long been absent from Western culture are being forged between father and child in a modern, post-feminist society.

This statement is an outright lie and I call Bullshit on this.   Men have always been fathers to their children and feminism never gave men this.   In fact in poor households, with the men working as well as the women the kids had equal time with both parents.  As a family.

In today’s society, with the high divorce rates, women are being awarded custody of the children in the majority of divorces.  Many of those men only get to see their children one weekend a month (if they are lucky) and rotating holidays.    And that is with joint custody.  That doesn’t allow much time for fathers to be with their children, or be fathers.    Feminism did this.  Not only that but the women demand support payments and alimony from the ex husband and the home and the car and usually gets those as well in most divorces.  This forces the man to pay for the wife, children and to pay HER Bills while allowing her to keep her money and spend it as she wishes without the responsibility of spending that on her children.

This is one of the main causes why men end up in jail, because in a marriage if a person’s financial situation changes the house finances are adjusted to suit that change.  After a divorce settlement, if a man loses his job he is still expected to pay these costs or end up in jail.   This is another reason why we are seeing more men homeless and broke.  And as well others fleeing the country to avoid the prohibitive costs set by the courts, on behest of the woman.

In the rare cases where the father gets custody, the women at most is expected to pay a small amount in support and very rarely alimony to support the husband, simply because men are usually the bigger bread winners and it’s rare to find a woman who makes more money in her chosen field.

And not only that but women will get paid by the state, if she is a single mother and no father listed on the birth certificate.  In other words the mother has no idea who the father is so the state becomes the father.   As long as she has that kid, then the government will pay her for it.   Now granted a man will get that same treatment if they have custody and the mother isn’t in the picture but that is extremely rare.

5. Feminism helps to make straight sex better and healthier. The impact of societal policing of female sexuality affects everyone, including the men who women are sleeping with. Many women must deal with debilitating feelings of guilt, shame and anxiety induced by patriarchy’s constant need to dominate and diminish female minds and bodies, which ultimately has negative effects on their sexual self-esteem. Feminism has fought to create safe spaces where women can engage in discourse about sex and their personal experiences. This not only helps women to better understand their minds and bodies, but it also enables the exploration of sexual desire and gives them the confidence to speak openly to their partners. Better communication and understanding is helpful in all relationships, especially sexual ones.

This is rich.  We are a dimorphic species.   That means there are inherent, instinctual things that males and females do differently.  This has to do with our evolution of our genders.    In order to ensure men’s genetics were passed on, the males would attempt to impregnate as many females as possible.   The more females, the more virile the man appears and the more attractive the male was to females.   Women however, evolved slightly different.   Due to the chance of death in childbirth and complications during pregnancy, women had to be more careful on choosing a mate.

This is why men to this day seem to be more like sexual beings who are out to sleep with as many women as possible, while women feel guilt over sleeping with many men.    This is a type of built in evolutionary trait that is built within each gender.

As for the safe spaces comment .. I say FUCK YOU FEMINISM.   Men are not allowed to have men only safe spaces.   You protest and screech at the mention of men only places.    So BULLSHIT on that statement.   As for confidence in speaking to their spouses.  If you lack the confidence, then maybe you need  get some mental health professional to help you with that.  Confidence comes from within and is not a gender trait in any way shape or form.   That is a trait that is learned.  If all your hearing is men are rapists, men are violent and men are evil, then yes, women will have confidence issues when speaking with men, including any boyfriends or husbands.  That is the fault of FEMINISM, not men.

7. Feminism helps society care about things that affect the women men care about. Birth control, women’s reproductive health, the right to vote, access to education and employment are just some of the issues feminism has tackled. Feminists have also worked to protect women and girls from domestic violence, sexual harassment and sexual assault. Without the movement, the women who men love — daughters, mothers, sisters, friends, girlfriends, wives — would be voiceless and without legal or social protection.

No one has ever said men didn’t care about women or women’s issues.   Which is why your movement had garnered such huge support.   However, I notice you don’t include abuse shelters for abused men, or right to fatherhood for men, or sexual harassment against men, or sexual assault against men in your statement.   You know, the problems that have gotten progressively worse since feminists have gotten their way?   And women, have never been voiceless.  They have ALWAYS had support in law against the crimes you list.   Women however, get away with these crimes more than men and men suffer as a result, which helps contribute to the suicide rates and homelessness of men.

8. Improvement for women and girls equals improvement for everyone. Multiple studies on the socioeconomic impact of education on society have found that increases in female education attainment leads to higher levels of both economic and social development. Countries that focus on educating women and girls tend experience decreased infertility and infant mortality rates and increased GDPs. As best said by the World Bank’s lead education economist, Harry Patrinos, “the profitability of education, according to estimates of private rate of return, is indisputable, universal and global.” A study done by Cynthia Lloyd and Margaret Greene, (Girls Count: A Global Investment and Action Agenda) with just one extra year of education to women and girls, their wages increased from 10-20 percent. These improvements benefit not only females, but also their families and society as a whole since money is typically reinvested (in the form of purchases) into the community.

Citation needed.     No actually statistics show that women are becoming more violent and men are opting out of marriage more.  Education is geared to get women into university into stem fields but women are not CHOOSING those fields.  Instead they choose courses that are easier and help them get careers in jobs that allow them the flexibility of scheduling and safety, over those that men get into which take them away from family more and are more dangerous to make more money.

In fact, less men are able to attend university due the fact they get no financial incentives or free rides.  Women get grants, loans and many other incentives to get into college and university.   That isn’t improvement.  It is oppression.

In closing I’m going to say this. Feminists are fucking idiots, with no concept that they are harming men, and women with their viewpoints and beliefs.   In no way shape or form is the oppression of men’s rights equality.  

Why Men cannot be a Feminist

man crying Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

The feminist movement is not for men.   It has been, and always be a platform for women to elevate themselves higher than men.    The fact that these women who claim to be feminists cannot see this, could be considered a psychological blind spot.    Men who support them blindly usually label themselves as feminists as well.    I’ve seen many articles by feminists who laugh or agree that men cannot be feminists.    Many think it’s great they have support from many of the male gender but don’t see them as feminists.

They just can’t be.   Feminism is for equal rights for women.  Always has been.  Modern day feminism has twisted the deifnition to make it sound like it is for equality for all.   This is a lie.   You cannot have equality for all when you elevate a group above another group.   This is also called gender bias or discrimination based on gender.

A person who truly wants equality for all is called an Egalitarian.  Not a feminist.    And a true feminist will tell you that feminism is about women have full rights and accepting responsibility for their actions that come along with it.    Even modern day feminists will parrot that line, but many don’t recognize when they are not taking responsibility.

Some cases where women don’t take responsibility.

1.   Rape.    They do not, and will not accept that there is any responsibility on the part of the woman who is a victim of rape.  We hear constantly and consistently that it shouldn’t matter what she is wearing when she is raped or how much she had to drink, or if she went with the guy willingly.    All the questions that are associated with a police investigation are seen as attacks on a victim by the police.   They expect people, and the law to blindly take their word for it.    Then we have to look at what they consider rape.   In their eyes, if a male and a female are both drunk and has sex, then the woman has been raped because she was drunk and is not capable of consent.  Yet the man, who is drunk as well is responsible regardless of the fact he was drunk as well.

This kind of idiocy, brings to the forefront of women not wanting to take responsibility for their own actions.   These feminists actually think this is logical.    Rape is not all that common as they would have you believe.  Many men are currently in jail for false accusations made and the misconceptions that the law assumes as rape.

Rape of Men by women.    Feminists will ignore this, laugh that this exists or sympathize but say it is a male problem.    This is a real thing and has a name.  Sperm Jacking.    Extreme cases of this, happen when a woman drugs a man comatose and then performs oral sex, masturbates or has vaginal intercourse with the man while unconscious to get his sperm so she can get pregnant.

This is not considered rape under the law.   Even when the guy wakes and says “No, get off me”.   There is no consent and women get away with this.    And, not only that, but they then go after the man for support for any children they conceive.   The government will also pay them.

So not only is the legalized rape of men, but it is sanctioned by the government via cash incentives and ignored by law.

2.  Genital Mutilation.   It is illegal for women to be circumcised without  their consent and has been for decades.   However, it is perfectly legal for the practice to happen on newborn baby boys.  Without any anesthesia or only a local, on the pretext of possible medical conditions that may or may not happen after the child becomes sexually active.   And in many cases, for aesthetic reasons.   Many feminists see nothing wrong with the practice and the ones who marry men, have said in studies they prefer a cut penis vs an uncut one.    For this reason alone, many feminist mothers look at this as something good.

3.  Male support groups.   If the feminists out there are really for equality, they wouldn’t fight so hard against male groups that form to discuss male issues.   Instead they gather to protest and even go as far as to call them hate groups against women, when in fact they are not.   They simply feel threatened because these groups, (much like myself), ask questions of the feminist movement and analyze their stats and studies that make their outrageous claims and question the ideals.    Any democratic, civilized society allows this, and welcomes it.   Ideas should be questioned and tested.   If an idea is sound or a theory has any basis in fact, then it should hold up to scrutiny.   Feminists ideas don’t do that.   So far none of them have.

4. CIS Gender Myth-   Many males are identifying themselves as CIS gender.    Yet, I have yet to hear or see any feminist say they are CIS.   They won’t because they consider themselves women.   Not gender assigned at birth.   The whole concept goes against our entire evolution, science, biology and the differences in chemicals within each genders bodies.      They now have men prattling on how they are CIS gender.   Instead of saying I’m a man.  They will want you to say “I’m a CIS”.   This is an attempt to remove your masculine identity, and to make you more pliable to their demands.   Just don’t question them on it.

These are just four simple reasons why you can’t be a feminist if your male.   They don’t want you to be, they see you as less than them.   They don’t care for your rights, only their own, but they want you to pay for their mistakes.

That isn’t equal rights or fair treatment by any standard.   That is male bashing at it’s finest.   So to all the self proclaimed male feminists, remember it’s okay to cry, because they all like to drink male tears.

Step by step commentary on the Washington Post article – What “Leading” feminists want to accomplish this year. (2014)

feminist-meme23

So I’m going to yet another list commenting on a Washington post article about what the feminists hope to accomplish in 2014 for “equality” for all.

1.  My hope is that feminist, racial justice, reproductive rights and LGBT movements build a coalition that centers on the lives of women who lead inter-sectional lives and too often fall in between the cracks of these narrow mission statements.

So this one seems like equality but on the whole it is just plain stupid when you analyze the whole thing.   She wants that feminists, (okay), racial justice (that isn’t a group but an ideal), reproductive rights (again, that isn’t a group of people but a law term), and LGBT movements (That is another group of people), build (that is the act of making a structure), a coalition (How do you make an an coalition with an ideal or a law term?) That centers on the lives of women (AH Yes, what about men CIS, Transexuals and gay and bisexual men?)

In other words you only want equality for yourself and not for anyone else including those in that coaltition.  NEXT!

2. I’d love to see publications make a greater effort to include the voices of women, gender non-conforming people, and people of color – and put programs and policies in place that will help to level the playing field

How much more effort do you want in publications.  The majority of the publications if not all, have women’s voices being heard, and since you can’t really define “non-conforming genders” because GASP!  They don’t identify as man or woman, the ONLY two genders on the planet.   Then they can’t exists and don’t really have any need for any voice but to see a shrink.    People of color?  Are you saying you don’t have any outlets for your voice if your of any color?  Could you ask the BET channel people or the Latino Channels or the Asian channels or the aboriginal channels?  Or the magazines like Belle, FEMME, and the thousands of other magazines that are solely for these groups?  Or the multitudes of sites that are dedicated to allowing everyone equally to blog about their thoughts and feelings, like the one I’m currently writing in?  Fucking dumb people.  *facepalm*

3. I would like to see less digital dualism, which perpetuates the fallacy that online harassment isn’t “real” harassment when in fact so many women writers face threats just for doing their job -writing- on the Internet.

No one believes harassment online isn’t a real thing, the reason why you don’t and I don’t agree on this one is most feminists believe anyone who questions their myths with actual real life data and facts are considered by you feminists to be harassing you.   Criticism is not harassment you stupid fucking idiot.

4.  I would like to see the creation of 2 million new, living wage ($15 or more) care giving jobs, and more affordable options for quality care for working families, particularly in light of the numbers of women in the workforce and the rapidly growing older population in America.

So you want a woman dominated field to force employers to pay their staff $15.00 an hour, which of course would force the daycare centers to charge the parents more money so they can pay the staff. which would mean that less parents could afford the daycare that they can barely afford now, and so because less parents would bring their children to daycare and find alternate places to bring their children, or quit their jobs to take care of their children, then those daycare centers will shut down and you women will be out of jobs and screaming for more daycare.     Did I explain efficiently how stupid your “want” is?  And you go on to want MORE affordable options for quality care for working families, particularly women (sigh, what about men, or gay men who need safe places to retire),   and the rapidly growing older population in america.   So that last “want” shows me you don’t want to again take responsibility but instead want to shove your parents who are getting older into a home, and want the public to pay for this so you don’t have to be responsible by providing care to your parents who had raised you and took care you and gave you, your fucking privilege.  YOU UNGRATEFUL BITCH!

5. We have an amazing opportunity with @heforshe for one half of humanity (men) to join in solidarity with the other half of humanity (women) in creating a shared vision of gender equality that benefits all of humanity.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!   That is fucking hilarious.  You want men to join you in a campaign solely designed to benefit women and call it “gender equality” and have the audacity to say it would benefit all of humanity when the name of it actually says IT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF WOMEN……. HE (MEN WORKING FOR ) 4SHE (BENEFITING)….   YOU FUCKING STUPID TWAT!  How stupid do you think men are?

6. I hope that 2015 brings a focus on turning the anger and frustration around the issues of police brutality and violence against black people in this country into concrete policy changes being led by the diversity of leaders I’ve seen and continue to see in the 2014 actions. We want to convene the table of change, not have a seat at it.

2015 is here.  Half way through the year.   The police have become more brutal.  Why aren’t the feminists outraged that men are dying and condemning the police for it and rioting in the streets along side them?  OH WAIT! They are praising the mom who pulled her son off the street for fighting and rioting against that very issue you are against.   And not only that you want to convene the table of change.  Not have  seat at it.  This sounds like you want to dictate change and not be part of a discussion.    (You almost had me there but I caught the bullshit!) *wags finger at you*

7. I hope to see a continued resurgence of young Black people owning their power to end police and domestic violence. 2015 will be a year of fresh ideas mixing with tried and true organizing tactics in the tradition of leaders like Ella Baker.

I’m for this one but again, it focus’s on one group and not really equal.  How about ending domestic abuse and police abuse for all.   Since you know, feminism is about equality and not about any one fucking group.   I do get the focus with the crap that happens to the black community so I’ll give them a pass on this one since it is a big issue.

8. I want to see Twitter, Facebook and YouTube set up coherent standards and effective block/report tools to protect users from abuse, and hate speech–particularly rape victims being harassed and doxxed for speaking out

YOU DUMB TWAT.  THEY ALREADY EXIST.   IN FACT WITH A CLICK OF A FUCKING BUTTON YOU CAN EFFECTIVELY HAVE PEOPLE BANNED.     And what the fuck…   You want to “doxxed” people for “speaking out”?  So you are openly and are against FREEDOM OF SPEECH if it goes against what you think is okay.   Is that it?  You fucking feminists are so quick to smear a man’s name if he is perceived as doing something wrong without any evidence, proof or even any arrest.  Just on a woman’s claim, protesting, sending him death threats and attacking him.   And yet you want to see tighter controls to censor free speech on people (men) like me, speaking out against your nonsense bullshit crap, because, we demand equality.   YOU FUCKING TWAT!

9.  I want to see a mass realization that police brutality is a feminist issue and for mainstream feminist organizations to help change those policies.

WHAT THE FUCK!  SO MEN DON”T GET BRUTALIZED BY THE POLICE?   ARE THE RIOTS IN FERGUSON, BALTIMORE, NEW YORK and other places around the United States just what?  Male oppression of women?   FUCK ME! THAT IS THE MOST IDIOTIC STATEMENT OF SELF ENTITLED BULLSHIT.  I THINK I JUST THREW UP A LITTLE IN MY MOUTH.

10. In 2015, I’d love to see more representation of women of color in sociopolitical actions, and I’m doing my part by organizing a Women’s Freedom March centering on women of color and our stories.

Again, what about the men.   Women are represented in every single group out there.   What the fuck!   And why aren’t you calling on your feminists for this since, they allegedly are for equality. OH WAIT!  ONLY THE BLACK WOMEN COUNT FOR YOU!  YOU FUCKING HYPOCRITE, YOUR THROWING YOUR OTHER SISTER FEMINISTS UNDER THE BUS!

11. I want to see queer and trans people of color with radical social and political analyses dominate independent media by creating and growing our own platforms, so we can centralize and control our own narratives.

This one is funny since black people are the most widely known to be homophobic, queer bashing people out there when it comes to their own people.   They are degraded and beaten and killed, even by their own family members for being unmanly by liking the members of the same gender.   The whole black male culture is centered on fucking women to prove manliness.   Anything outside this and most fear for their lives.   And you want more black queer and trans people to openly come forward in that toxic hate filled atmosphere to “dominate” independent media?

Why I kind of applaud the idea, you need to work on acceptance of queer and trans people in your own community more before gay people trust the black community to be open.  And I do give you credit Madam, that you didn’t make this about Women only!  BRAVO!  (Unless by Queer you mean lesbians because I have a hunch that is what you mean by Queer since typically that is a lesbian term)

12.  I hope we can channel the energy around campus gender-based violence toward creating more options outside the criminal justice system for all survivors, not only students.

What the fuck?    Feminists have spent decades instilling into women that they are the victims of violence in a male dominated society.  You even have a gender studies course that teaches you this.   However, this does sound for equality except, your to stupid to realize a campus’s are required to by law to make sure you and everyone are safe and do everything in their power outside of law within their own policies (that feminists dictated), to ensure the safety of “all” (meaning women), students.   WHO THE FUCK ELSE ARE VICTIMS ON A CAMPUS SETTING?   THE BIRDS IN THE TREES?   YOU FUCKING STUPID WOMAN!  *FACEPALM*

13. In 2015 I hope for a movement that is fighting for ALL black lives, and that allows for the stories of ALL black women to be in the forefront of our fight.

Well shit, a feminist for all black lives.  That’s sounds more like equality.  Wait, okay I see the bullshit.   You want ALL BLACK WOMEN ahead of men of your fight.    Not men side by side.   Damn you almost had me there.  Really I applaud you for your sneaky diatribe of hate against men disguised as black united power.   It’s only okay for the black community to come together if women are in  charge is what you just said.  FUCK ME.

14. My 2015 resolution is to make sure that black women, especially black queer and trans women, are playing a strong leadership role in the growing movement for black lives and black liberation–because black women are the portals to the future, we can do a lot to shape a new economy and a new democracy for all of us.

Yes and while black communities are rioting  and burning all over the country, you are worried about black women, lesbians (because I know you don’t like men to have authority) and trans women to be in leadership roles for “all black lives” without actually having men represented here and black women are the portals to the future.   (well yes, because babies come out of you so you are the portal for the future generations).   And yes women can do a lot to shape the economy because it’s geared for them by women.  OH AND DON”T FUCKING BE AN ADVOCATE FOR DEMOCRACY WHEN YOU JUST SAID YOU WANTED EVERYONE BUT MEN IN LEADERSHIP ROLES!  YOU FUCKING STUPID FUCKING MAN HATING WOMAN!

15.  In 2015 I want to see our communities continue to rise up to challenge the criminalization of our people. At the national and local level my organization BAJI and the national network we coordinate, the Black Immigration Network, will be campaigning to end mass incarceration, detention and deportation.

I see no issue with this since you are actually including everyone.   BRAVO MA’AM!  You are the first feminist since I started reading feminist literature, that included men by default.  BRAVO!  *CLAP CLAP CLAP*  I could get behind that idea.  OH WAIT!  The majority of men in prison are because of false rape accusations and as well because they can’t pay female support because the courts favor women over men.  *BUZZER SOUNDS*  Sorry.. can’t get behind this, because the underlying problem still exists from why those men are there.

16. In 2015, I want fewer speeches about supporting women in games and more concrete action – it’s time to open up gamedev to the rest of us.

Game development is always open to you.  GENDER DISCRIMINATION IS AGAINST THE LAW!   THERE ARE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION LAWS THAT FORCE EMPLOYERS TO HIRE WOMEN EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT QUALIFIED.   THE FUCKING REASON DUMB ASS TWATS LIKE YOU AREN’T IN THE GAME DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRY IS BECAUSE YOU ARE CHOOSING NOT TO DO THE WORK TO GET THERE! YOU STUPID SELF ENTITLED BRAT!

Okay folks, *sips cold drink*,  this was a horrible article,  (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2015/01/02/what-leading-feminists-want-to-accomplish-this-year/)   I used to have some respect for the Washington post for some journalist (not much) ethics    The article, to give the post credit is a blog by an self described “writer”.  Since anyone can label themselves a writer now for writing a blog, or anything I guess that makes me one as well.    The only difference between myself and this writer, Ruth Tam is that I believe in equality, and truth for men and women, and don’t try to put my gender above women’s under the guise of “equality”.

#DONTBETHATWOMAN!

Why the feminists can’t work with Men’s Rights Groups…. The real reasons….

tumblr_n27kytbqFn1rlsig4o1_1280
(The above image is courtesy of tumbler)  This representation of what feminists want is actually correct if you take into account that they want to kill any man who doesn’t identify themselves as feminists.   So after killing any man who doesn’t agree with feminism (including myself), that would be accurate because the only people left would be feminists and their male breeding stock.

There are many pro feminist articles out there bashing men’s rights advocacy groups like AVOICEFORMEN or Cafe,   They prattle their man hating heads about how “misogynistic” the men’s groups are, how they are hate groups but use quotes from satire, or snippets of  comments out of context as our dogma, and then they take the angry words of the men and use that as fuel to play the name game and blame men again *rolls eyes* for all their problems.

Yes that is right, the men who are standing up and calling feminist movement for what it is, *cough* bullshit *cough* are misogynistic bastards, who are all out to get women with our privilege in a patriarchal society of oppressed women being at the top of the oppression list.  *smacks forehead*

So without further adieu to why feminists or men’s rights advocates get along to find equality here is the list:

1.  Men’s rights advocates are trying to bring the issues facing men to the forefront to the public to garner support and draw attention to the issues including feeling oppressed.

Feminists want the men’s issues to be addressed under the banner of feminism but refuse to recognize they are the cause of the majority of the issues facing men and will try to shut down any men’s rights group who try to point this out.

2.  Men’s rights group are trying to correct misinformation by using facts about homelessness and demand more shelters and safe spaces for homeless men.

Feminists –  *cricket sounds*

3.  Men’s rights groups are trying to correct misinformation by using real statistical data instead of using misleading or made up data about domestic violence.  That of course being Men are victims of domestic violence just as much as women are.   The difference is men don’t have safe places to protect them from their violent wives/girlfriends.    Hence why there are more homeless men.   And, men are more likely to be ASSUMED they deserve that violence and therefor goes to jail on the word of the woman, even though she was the violent offender.

Feminists –  *crickets*

4.  Men’s groups are trying to address the rape culture myth with facts and real statistics.  Like the 1 in 4 myth on college campus and universities.   The statistics show the real number being 1 in 1300 which is a rare rape and that number is getting lower.

Feminists –  “No that is not true, women are raped more now than they were 50 years ago you misogynistic. patriarchal bastard man.   Stop being a rape apologist!”

5.  Men’s groups are trying to address the issue of rape happening by both sexes on both sides, that women are  not the only victims.   Men are vaginally raped by women or orally raped by women all the time.  Many will do it to acquire sperm to get pregnant so they can sue for child support and go on welfare who will pay them to sit at home and take care of the baby that they conceive from raping the man to steal his sperm, even after he has removed consent. (Yes this happens folks)

Feminists:  This doesn’t happen.    (or)  Rape is wrong. (Yet they do nothing when it happens and praise the woman if the men try to press charges).

6.  Men groups are trying to bring to light that women are more favored in the courts and because of the laws and as well the social perceptions, they get a free pass to many crimes, like rape, beating their husband, stabbing their spouse, or even outright murder of men or their children.    The law system learned a very long time ago that it is harder to gain a conviction on a women than it is a man so many crimes don’t even make it to a jury trial.  And those that do, the women who did the crime will get no sentence, or a lighter sentence than a man would.    All you have to do is look at how many prisons that hold men are and compare with the ones for women. Or speak to a judge or a prosecution lawyer.

7.  Men’s groups advocate and trying to bring to the light (it is starting) that genital mutilation of any kind is wrong.  Many don’t see the chopping of a baby boy’s penis is wrong.    Many are mutilated each day for the sole reason of the perceived image of cleanliness or religion, but is banned for women for decades now.  Many men carry the regret and depression for decades and all their lives for this mutilation.

Feminists –  To give them credit, they are starting to speak out against this practice.  Sort of.   They are posting memes online on social media accounts.    So I guess that is a good sign.  I still don’t see any protests or any vehement outrage about it though and many of the man loving femists will prefer a mutilated penis vs an intact one because they think the penis is dirty with the foreskin than without.

8.  Men’s rights groups are trying to create safe women free areas so we can speak openly and freely without reprisal from feminists groups and share our feelings and ideas.

Feminists –  Men have bathrooms and locker rooms.  (No we don’t because you want to be able to walk into those places too, but to be realistic, you may discuss your feelings and chat about issues with your fellow women in bathrooms and locker rooms but men see these places to change clothes and defecate/urinate and wash hands.  Not have discussions about our feelings, we prefer less smelly places to do that thanks).

9.   Men’s rights groups are trying to bring to light that women are more favored than men in divorce and child custody cases than men to the point where even when judges agree the mother is unfit and shouldn’t have custody of any children, they will still be awarded support payments and the children, simply because of her gender.

Feminists –  “HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!”

10.  Men have higher suicide rates than women.  The likeliness of a male to commit suicide starts before they hit puberty and will increase as they get older.  By the time they are thirty the chances are 1 out of 12 men will have tried to commit suicide.

Feminists –  Boo Hoo.  Shake it off and act like a man.  I’m the victim of male oppression!

So as you can see by the short list the reactions from feminists have been short and sweet.  Many that have husbands illicit sympathy and are in general polite but they all ignore men’s issues and always have. And in many cases the laws that they have gotten in place under the guise of “equality” have placed heavy influence on our society in the forms of funding to problems that are seen as women’s issues, and in the court systems, and even in jobs and universities.   When men, any men, (even feminist men) speak about this, the men get shouted down (even the feminist ones) and will be called a hate group against women that are claiming to be for equality for all.

Right?   The idea that men standing up for men’s issues and yes using vulgar, rude language to get attention, because frankly we are oppressed.  And we are pissed off.   Not at women but feminists, because all their affirmative action crap and wage gap crap, and those stupid campaigns that are pure man bashing over stupid trivial things like how wide should men be allowed to spread their legs on a subway, or women feeling bad about having to say they are sorry that many consider common sense courtesy.  Like entering a room unannounced, or interrupting a phone call to ask your boss something.

How about this feminists, how about you get the book that is taught in Gender Studies the “Scum Manifesto” banned from the country under the hate crime laws (because that is what it is), start fighting for real issues instead of Manspreading or that stupid Sarah Silverman superbowl ad apologizing because the stupid woman who gave birth in Sarah’s mansion, because she had a boy instead of a girl, or stop the “NOH8” advertisements that bash men opening by using little girls and boys telling grown adults to FUCK OFF.

When you stop bashing men and vilifying men to the point that the suicide rates in men stop rising or that men are treated more fairly in courts and in society then maybe we won’t call your movement a useless, man hating, rape blaming, slut shaming group.

To all the men in the feminist movement.   GET OUT.  They will throw you under the bus faster than shit on their shoe.   They are fooling you into thinking that they are oppressed.  They are no more oppressed than my big toe.  They have more rights than you and more support systems in place than you.  You are nothing but a “Sperm donor” to them.    This goes for all the gay ones as well.   Just because your gay doesn’t mean you don’t support women’s rights.   Even the men’s groups support women’s rights.   We just don’t oppress men to do it.

To the feminists in general,  Practice what you preach bitches!

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Feel free to “like” my blog if you agree with the above.