I recently got into a debate on this (again), and for some reason people cannot fathom that hate speech laws are a form of censorship. Worse yet. We have the mayor of Ottawa Jim Watson, who has been in his office since the beginning of time, who openly now tweets and states that he is for the stiffing of speech because he finds it “vile”.
I tweeted him and stated that wanting to censor free speech is wrong, and he responded by calling me vile for supporting the guy who wants to open a dialog about the rape laws.
Reasonable people understand that rape is bad. We all know this. No one condones rape. The problem lies with the idea and definitions of rape.
Feminist supporters think rape can be this magical thing that can happen at any point. Let me explain.
They (Liberals and Feminists) believe that (I’ve written about this before),
- A man and a woman who BOTH get drunk, BOTH consent to sex and have sexual intercourse is rape. Why? A woman is apparently unable to consent while drunk.
- A woman who goes home with a strange man, gets drunk, takes drugs and gets naked, has sex with the strange man but doesn’t remember having sex has been raped.
- A woman who consents to having sex even when sober and then regrets the experience a week later, has been apparently been raped.
Do you notice the trend here? Women are not responsible for their actions but men are despite being equal in things.
So this Return of Kings guy is calling for a debate and discussion about the rape laws if it occurs in your own home.
I get what he is saying and while I don’t agree entirely, with much of what he says, I understand that freedom of speech means being able to talk about things that people may find vile or abhorrent without repercussions from government.
As far as Mayor Jim Watson is concerned the idea of questioning the idea of rape laws is abhorrent. This is the type of people in power and have been in power for a very long time.
I tweeted back the mayor stating the differences, that hate is the calling for 90% of men to be castrated or killed via the #killallmen hashtag. Or the Drinking Male Tears meme which is common among rich white sorority girl feminists who do not understand basic concepts of freedom of speech.
Using these laws to shut down talk and discussion that you “FEEL” is wrong is not a valid reason. Free Speech is a double edged sword. I’m gay and I’ve heard the debate and discussion when gay marriage and even back when gays were not accepted as they are now. I may not have liked what was being said but I never wanted to stop people from speaking their minds on subjects and having rational discussions.
Jim Watson, Justin Trudeau, if a woman or a man goes home with a stranger, and has spent a night flirting and implying they are interested in having sexual intercourse, and they go to either one’s home, get drunk or even not. Get naked and have sex, and one party regrets it the next day, that is not rape. Neither is it when you get drunk, and get naked in someone else’s bed. That is called implied consent. I know this concept is foreign to you but it is a real thing. Penalizing someone for wanting to speak their mind on the subject or banning someone from speaking is called censorship.
And censorship is a form of oppression and hate. Hate of true freedom.