New Mental Disorder Discovered- IVD

Bipolar Disorder1

 

I have discussions with people both online and in real life about current affairs, politics, activism, and more.     Many people are passionate about what they are discussing and as such, I really don’t mind when the discussion or debate gets heated.    If both people understand that the discussion or debate is just that, then you can have a heated debate without taking it personally.

However, many people out there are unable to cope with this idea and do take things personally.   And those people tend to be the worst.   Especially some of the commentators on social media sites.   Instead of saying something constructive or conducive to the debate or discussion at hand, they of course, resort to name calling or attacking someone for stating something they have every right to state.     And instead of being civilized they become these lunatics with an axe to grind.

After decades of being active online,  I can spot these people very easily.   They try to come off as some sort of moral authority on their opinion and attack someone by using slurs that sound racist and bigoted.   Then when you confront them they invariably turn their ire on you when you defend yourself or a friend  from them.   When that doesn’t work and their argument falls apart they then try to slander you to try to get you to move away from the topic at hand in hopes that you will defend yourself from their offensive and then finally claim victim status saying you are the aggressor while they are the poor victim.

This happens almost daily online with people.   They think that being offended by something they see online gives them the automatic moral right to attack people, and when they are defended against, they pretend to be victims of abuse online.    There are many people out there who do this.   I see many feminists, SJWs and liberals who do this.

New Disorder….??

This is what I call the Infantile Victim Disorder or IVD.   You get an IVD when you have a warped set of beliefs that cause you to believe there is a mysterious patriarchy made up of old white men out to get you.    Or that you think you are superior to the other person due to their body parts.  And even due to a skin tone that is not considered Caucasian.

Symptoms include,  being “triggered“.  Using the word Problematic,  and telling men they have male privilege or the other variant if you are a person of another color,  having white male privilege.

Other symptoms may include:   Obesity, Poverty, Neon color in hair, getting undressed in public to march against rape, yelling and spitting on men at university, submitting false rape claims, false reports of sexual assault.  Raping men.  Being the aggressor in domestic violence.  Lesbianism.

If you suspect you have IVD, please go see a psychiatrist immediately.     Usually sufferers of IVD also have Bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and project their issues and blame others for problems that don’t exist or are the cause of the sufferer’s own actions.

Advertisements

Feminists try to get Documentary banned!

DSC01401-Version-2-800x445
(Image courtesy of original article: https://anongalactic.com/feminists-are-trying-to-shut-down-a-documentary-on-mens-rights/)

The documentary film, being created by feminist and filmmaker Cassie Jaye.    The film called “The Red Pill”, documents the Men’s Rights Right Movement and sheds the light on the issues that men face into today’s society.

Feminists of course, see this as an attack on them personally and want to shut it down.  As usual, when something is not about them or links feminism in a bad light, which this film points out how, when, why and how feminism has taught people to think that men are the boogy man and gives a glimpse to who the real bad guy is.

(Sneak Preview Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK7n_XA40V8 )

For decades, men have been fighting for men’s rights, but until now men’s voices have not been heard.   This film is a must see for anyone who wants to learn the truth about feminism and the Men’s rights movement.

Question you may want to ask yourself;

Do you know of a father who was denied custody to his children?
Do you know of a father who was denied custody to his children and the mother is abusive?
Do you know any man who has committed suicide?
Do you know any man who was homeless?

Do you know of a man who has been sent to jail for not paying child support because he couldn’t afford to?
Do you know of a man who was denied the right to be a father because the mother didn’t want to be a mother and got an abortion?

These are just some of the issues cover in the film.    I for one, think this film is due, and encourage everyone, feminist, MRA, or neutral to watch.

That is, if the feminists don’t shut it down.  After all, we can’t have free speech can we?

Dear Feminists and Canadian Universities…. This is what happens when you belittle, and demean half the worlds population.

Dear Feminists and the Universities of Canada,

I’m writing this to tell you something.    Don’t try to use your feminist logic to assume I’m saying something else.  I’m not.   What I say, is what I mean.

I am not making a threat.  I am making a statement.

This open letter is in regards to the online comments that have been made recently online, by the kids in 4chan.   So far, their comments, which have not been threats, but you chose to view this as a threat, and that is fine.    I state this is fine, because, for you to feel threatened, you must think that these people must have reason to be angry with you, and in that logic, you are correct.

Universities have allowed feminist ideology to infest campus doctrine and has spread like a bacterial infection that resists any antibiotics.     It attacks men at every chance it can,   It’s professors are there to teach reason and logic, and instead teach illogical, nonsense in gender studies courses.

During their university days, they are inundated with rhetoric of hate.  Hate against men.   That one in four men in college will commit an act of rape, or that they will be rape upwards of five times in their life.  That a woman, who is strong and independent, cannot accept responsibility of consent when she has been drinking, and has been raped, regardless of her approval for sexual intercourse, and yet the man, who is equally drunk, is responsible for his consent.  (All of which are lies)

Due to the illogical thought process,  that feminists now have, all due to the gender studies courses and their so called professors, they come out hating the world and blaming men for their lack of direction, lack of education, and are unable to get jobs.     They go on to blame men, yet again, via the mythical patriarchy, and the equally mythical wage gap, which of course has been debunked by even prominent feminists.

You teach these young women, to be entitled to whatever a man earns, instead of earning it for themselves, like other strong independent women have done throughout the ages.   You teach them that they need to do whatever they need to do, to steal a man’s earnings, ruin a man’s life, and even to lie, when it comes to rape, assault and other serious crimes.

This is not only affecting young women in serious ways, but young men as well.   The toxic nature of feminism in universities, has caused young men who participate in these gender studies courses to loose their sense of self and become self hating, looking for approval from their female counterparts.  Seeking not only approval but a sense of identity.  By teaching things like CIS gender, and that masculine behavior is toxic to society, you are teaching hatred.   These young men come out of universities with low self esteem, many have lost their identities that took a lifetime to build, and even question their gender orientation, causing physical harm, emotion harm and in some cases, death by suicide.

Universities used to be places of learning, but have now become places of hate.   They preach, that is okay for women to be allowed “safe places”, but not men.   Groups like CAFE are attacked, when they wish to have meetings to discuss men’s issues that affect them, but because they do not accept the feminists narrative, they get called  a hate group, and are attacked at every chance.

Feminists are not what they used to be in the eighties or nineties.    Those women were true feminists.  They wanted equal treatment, not special treatment.  They wanted to be able to sleep with whomever they wished and accepted the consequences of doing so.   Today’s feminists that are coming out of the Canadian Universities, do not want to accept any responsibility for anything.  They don’t want to work as hard as everyone else, they do not wish to earn those positions of prestige, like being members of a board.    They refuse to listen to reason and don’t understand why their choices, affect their earning potential, or even that by choosing to sleep around, without protection, that they will be mothers when they are not ready, and end up miserable.

This is why, you have been seeing those online comments as threats dear feminists and universities.    This is why your guilty conscious, perceives angry comments online as threats and not comments.  It is because deep down, you know you are doing something wrong.

And you know what Universities and Feminists?   You do deserve it.  If you continue, the way you have, things could get worse.   Men in general have formed groups outside of your college campus’, they have joined online communities to discuss these issues.    Some see you as a joke, some see you as harmless, but some, do not see you as anything but a threat, and sadly, those are the young men who are surrounded by the hate on campus’s across Canada, and even the United states.

Now here is a dose of truth, and reality.   Women are treated very well in western society.   They are not treated equal, no.  They are actually treated superior than men.   They get so much preferential treatment due to their gender, that men, are dying because of it.

Your own universities have incentives to get women into the campus’, and stem branches of learning.   Incentives which you profit from, and due to this men are lagging behind in education.   Not equal.

In law, women are treated as victims, even when they commit crimes.   It is less likely a jury will convict a woman than if the defendant was a man.  If a man goes to trial, the chances of him going to jail for the same crime a woman does rises significantly.

In society, if a woman is beating a man in public, he is laughed at, and teased, and accused of “deserving” it, by both men and women.   If a man beats a woman in public, or even defends himself from an attack from a woman, then he is accused of being a criminal.

In the workplace, women can make a complaint about sexual harassment, without any evidence or proof and it is taken seriously.   If a man makes the same complaint about a woman, it is treated lightly and even ignored.

The real feminists attained equality for their gender decades ago.    It is now time to stop the gender studies courses.  It is time to turn to real learning.

Stop teaching hate, stop teaching young minds to hate half the population.  Or you may find that half the population will fight back, and by looking at today’s society, that time may not be that far off.

Yours Truly.
A Man

How an Online Post caused fear in Feminists

Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

Toronto University campus increased it’s security after some online posts were put online, that scared feminists on the campus.

The threats which have been removed, read ” “go into the nearest Sociology or Women’s Studies classroom next week, and fire bullets into the Professor’s head and spray bullets all over the room until all the feminists are dead.””

Now, normally I am against unwarranted acts of violence.   I really am.    However, I have to say this about the whole situation.  It is not surprising and understandable.

This is a message to all you anti male feminists, when you threaten us, belittle us, hold campaigns that say #killallmen, or the don’t be that guy, or #manspreading, campaigns which target men.  Or in forums, online posts, or comments making plans to “castrate men in the town square”, “Put men in concentration camps and gas them” or eradicate men and keep 10 percent for breeding stock”.

Then you have to understand, that when you state these things, a sane person see’s this as a threat.  And anyone who feels threatened enough, will fight back.  So far it’s words for words, but as the months pass, I’ve been seeing more and more feminists out of these universities making these threats and laughing when men shout back.

Guess, your not laughing about it now though huh?

I couldn’t give a flying fuck about who you are, when you threaten someone you don’t get to walk away and play victim when your victim fights back.

If anything comes of this at the University, (I hope it doesn’t), but if it does, I won’t be shedding male tears over it.

I know that it’s wishful thinking but I sincerely hope these, spoiled self – entitled children see the error of their ways and stop attacking half the world’s population, because that half is getting sick of their shit.

(Original News Article:  http://news.nationalpost.com/toronto/online-posts-about-killing-feminists-prompt-university-of-toronto-to-increase-campus-security )

Dress Codes and Fashion Choices.

Business

I was on Facebook and someone had shared someone else’s post a sign that really got to me.  I thought about that sign and realized that the kids in schools don’t understand nor do they care or or simply not being taught anymore about a “time and a place” rule.   Instead they rally behind the “I want, want want” cry whenever they want something without thinking about if it is really appropriate or not.   Now I understand kids will usually take the opposite stance and get their hackles up, which is normal teen behavior.  This is why parents need to step up and explain what clothing is appropriate to certain situations.

Take the above photo.  That is clothing appropriate to an office environment.  Professional people who wear appropriate clothing in the work place.   Sane people understand this and understand that wearing clothing that is meant for beaches, is not appropriate for an office.   Like these outfits:

Crazy-sell-2015-Men-Women-Beach-Swimwear-Lovers-Couple-Swimming-Sport-Wear-Beach-Shorts-top-quality

This is what the currently crop of people and feminists are screaming about.  They want to wear clothing meant for summer and beaches to places of work and education.

Then there is the other problem with the post I had read.  Here is the image so you can understand.

11836731_1640955776161097_1502715658279897919_n

In case you can’t read it here is what it says

“When you INTERRUPT a girls school day to for her to CHANGE CLOTHES, or SEND HER HOME, because her shorts are too SHORT or her BRA STRAPS are VISIBLE, YOU are telling her that making sure BOYS have a “DISTRACTION FREELEARNING ENVIRONMENT is MORE IMPORTANT THAN HER EDUCATION.

INSTEAD OF SHAMING GIRLS FOR THEIR BODIES, TEACH BOYS THAT GIRLS ARE NOT SEXUAL OBJECTS. ”

I will break down the problems with this type of thinking.

  1.  This is the most important one.    This type of thinking disregards boys.  It tells them that girl’s rights to wear clothing they want, is more important than their education,  by NOT giving boys a distraction free environment.

2.  It ignores the fact that there are reasons why clothing that is revealing is inappropriate, and tells girls it’s perfectly okay to wear what you want no matter where you are.    You wouldn’t wear a bikini at a funeral or at an office, so it doesn’t make sense why you would wear hot pants and a bikini top to school, but this is what these kids want.

3.   It doesn’t prepare them for the real world or even University.   When they get to University they are considered or used to be considered adults and as such they will be treated as such and wearing inappropriate clothing to a class could have serious problems.

4.  This places responsibility on the men.   Men have eyes and are visually stimulated.  Women get angry with the boyfriends or husbands when the guy looks at another woman.  Even for a few seconds, and now they expect them not to look when girls are showing to much skin in a place that they are supposed to be learning for their future.

I’m going to approach the idea from a different angle.    If your so worried about wearing what you want to a place of learning then maybe your not focused on the right direction.  Maybe, just maybe you should focus on your education and not worry about fighting dress codes.

Wear black somber clothes at funerals

Wear scrubs when working in a medical environment

Wear Suits to offices

Wear swimwear to go swimming.

Clothing appropriate attire for appropriate occasions.

When is it okay to hit a woman?

man-hitting-woman

The answer is pretty simple but many women would disagree.    When a woman hits you, you hit back.     Violence is always wrong, but we as human beings have the right to defend ourselves from violence, even if that means using the same violence on our attacker.

Many woman, and I mean most women have used the idea of “It’s never okay to hit a woman” as a tool to be able to hit men.
Let’s first look at how that concept of “It’s never okay to hit a woman” idea came about.     We have to go back, to a time when women were thought of as the “weaker” sex.   Or rather, when everyone thought of them as the weaker sex.    We as men and even women considered it the men’s job to protect the women.  To this day, many women and men hold to this standard.

The problem now arises with feminists, and other women who claim that they can do anything a man can do, but better.  The women who claim they don’t need a man to protect them, or even the social justice warriors.

Society is now getting mixed messages.    We are taught (By woman) in our lives, that woman are strong and don’t need protection, and at the same time we are taught that it is never okay to hit a woman because she should be protected.

In today’s society, domestic abuse is roughly 50/50.   Men being the victims as much as women.   There are also millions of cases where women think it’s okay to slap a man for saying something they didn’t like, throwing things at a man when they get angry at them, or even destroy or damage property when they get angry.    Yet according to society and what we are taught since birth, we are not supposed to defend ourselves from these violent attacks if they are perpetrated by someone female.

woman-hitting-man-2915823

Enough is enough I say.   This type of thinking in our society creates a wrong message to the following generations.   If women want to be treated equally then they need to understand that having a vagina, does not give them free reign to hit men.    Men, if a woman hits you, then hit them back.   Defend yourself.   More men have died from domestic abuse than women have, simply because they have been under the belief that you shouldn’t hit a woman, even in self defense.    This is a societal construct that needs to be changed.

Ladies, if you hit a man, or anyone, expect to be hit back.   You cannot walk around hitting people period.

So to answer my original question….  If a woman hits you… HIT THEM BACK!

Child Support – The Ultimate Lottery Jackpot for Mothers.

child-support

I’ve had discussions with parents who receive and give child support, read news articles on parents who don’t pay their payments, and even go to jail.    Sadly, this system is one hundred percent biased against men.    One portion of the system that is really bad is the child support payments system.

You see there is a few huge flaws in the system.   First and foremost, when you are with someone, like a marriage, and one person’s income changes, then the household spending changes with it.  Cutting back on the budget, shopping, spending etc.  After the marriage ends, however, those payments don’t adjust or change.   This is a huge flaw and this lands many fathers in jail or leaving the country.    (Like this one:  http://www.thespec.com/news-story/2248120-hamilton-area-deadbeat-dad-flees-to-philippines/)

Most fathers, don’t get custody of their children and those children are used by the mothers as weapons, to get even and even extort money from their ex-husbands.   What is even worse still, is men who agree with this system.

Men are less likely to get custody of their children in a divorce, and if they are lucky get to see their children every other weekend and rotating holidays, at worst one weekend a month.    And for this, they are forced to pay half their pay cheque to go to the child and the ex wife.   Alimony and Child Support.

This is where I have issues.   If the ex spouse is no longer receiving Alimony due to marrying someone else, then the only extra money they are getting is from child support.    If they have married someone who makes less than the ex husband does, then the wife receives a drastic drop in money.  So the argument many parents who receive this support is, “I spent all my money on my kid, so the money I got in support is reimbursing me.

To anyone who thinks this way, you are  a spoiled self entitled brat and should be ashamed of yourselves.   That goes to any one who spent any money on themselves from that child support payments.

Both parents have to realize that this type of thinking is harmful to the children.   It means you are taking money that is supposed to go to them to buy things you want.   This may sound good to you, but it’s really horrible.

You both had a child.  That means you are both responsible, for that child’s well being.   If your the parent who got full custody and has the roof over the child’s head then, part of the money goes to that roof, food, clothing and if anything is left then, is supposed to go to things like extracurricular activities, hobbies and even toys or in the bank for a college education or for an emergency.

It is not meant to compensate you, if you spend all your money on the child you created so you can get your nails done or your hair done.

Alimony payments are payments to support YOU, as the ex spouse.   To ensure you live the way you are accustomed to until such time you remarry.   You don’t get child support to pay for your personal expenses.   The money you receive for your child is for your child.

The judge in court is biased against men in general because of the system in place.    So they of course will tell the women that the money is to go to reimburse them, but this is NOT the truth.   This is why there are two types of support payments.
This is why I call it the lottery jackpot for women.  This is why women have children, without thought.   They know, they will be taken care of and even the province will pay them money per child.   In Quebec, they used to pay over a thousand dollars a month per child, to the mother in baby bonus.  This was an encouragement to people to have children to raise the population numbers.     Now imagine if you had say three children and then got divorced, and had to pay child support, and the average being a grand per child.  So the mother would receive not only Alimony, but child support and baby bonus cheque.  Just baby bonus and child support alone for three children would be over six grand a month in Quebec (or used to), but then if you added in Alimony say two grand and you have a whopping eight thousand dollars a month in free money to the ex wife.  Even if you remove the Alimony, and say one child, that is two grand a month in money.  That is money the wife is getting for support of the child.    The sad part is she is not expected to get a job and input her own money.   However, some women do work hard and to put money into the support of their child, and that is a responsible thing to do.  What is not responsible is taking some of the child support payments and spending it on yourself as “reimbursement” because you spent all your money on the child by putting a roof over it’s head, food on the table and gas money driving the child around town to appointments or football practice.

Guess what?  That is the responsibility of being the parent who got custody.   Heck that is the responsibility of any parent period.

This system is also why women are raping men.  It is why Feminists will scream rape, even for consensual sex and why more men are swearing off women completely.

Women are paid to have babies, and get paid in a myriad of ways that encourages them to get pregnant and have a kid.  It’s a horrible system that has forced many men into poverty.   This system is more harmful than good.

It helps increase the following:
– Male Homelessness or poverty.

– Male Depression

– Male Suicide rates.

And the worst part is the children suffer.   They will hear the mother complaining to her friends or family that the “deadbeat” dad didn’t send his money to her, and so he is a horrible person.

Don’t be that Mom and spend that money on yourself.   Spend it on your kid, and if you have any left over, put it in a bank account for your child’s education.  Your hair and nails are just not that important compared to your child’s future.

A Scourge Is Spreading. Meninists Cure? Princess, Open Your Legs!.

‘Woman Spreading’ on New York Subways Is a Target of New Meninist. Campaign.

download (1)
It is the bane of many male subway and bus riders.  It is a scourge that is tracked on blogs and on Twitter.

And it has a name almost as distasteful as the practice itself.

It is womanspreading, the lay-it-all-out sitting style that more than a few women see as their inalienable public transportation right.

Now passengers who consider such inelegant female posture as infringing on their sensibilities – not to mention their share of subway space – have a new ally.  The Metropolitan Authority.

Taking on womanspreading for the first time, the authority is set to unveil public service ads that encourage women to share a little less of themselves in the city’s ever crowded subways and buses.

Targets of the campaign, those women who cross their legs, blocking aisles, or access to other seats, or by spreading out their belongings on empty seats, and refusing to move the bags when asked so no one else can sit down. can sometimes occupy two even three or four seats are not hard to find.  Whether they will heed the new ads is another question.

Riding the F train from Brooklyn to Manhattan on a recent afternoon, Emma C. Fitzsimmons 20, was unapologetic about sitting with her purse on the seat beside her or having her legs crossed which creates a tripping hazard.

“I’m not going to sit like a gentlmen does,”she said. “I’m going to sit how I want to sit.”

“And what if Mrs. Fitzsimmons, a writer from New York saw posters on the train asking her to place her bags on her lap? “I’d just laugh at the ad and hope that someone graffitis over it,” she said.

For Davidl Radcliffeson, an actor who confronts woman spreaders and tweets photos of them, his solitary shaming campaign now has the high powered help of the transportation authority, whose ads will be plastered inside subway cars.

“It drives me crazy, ” he said of women who cross their legs. “I find myself glaring at them because it just seems so inconsiderate in this really crowded city.”

When Mr. Radcliffeson, who lives in Brooklyn and is in his 30s, asks women to move, he siad, they rarely seem chastened: “I usually get grumbling or a complete refusal.”

incosiderate_girl_with_too_many_bags_taking_all_the_space_on_the_bus

The new ads – aimed at curbing rude behavior like womanspreading and carrying multiple bags on crowded trains – are set to go up in the subways next month.  They will carry the slogan, “Courtesy Counts: Manners Make a Better Ride.”
One of the posters is likely to be especially welcome to men – as well as the women who frown on womanspreading:”Princess…Stop The Spread, Please.” reads the caption next an image of riders forced to stand as a woman nearby sits so that her bags take up two seats.

The campaign is the latest in a long line of courtesy-themed crusades by the authority going back to at least the 1940s. One such ad urged men to “Hit, Her Again Dude, We don’t like Door-Blockers Either.”

The new ads come as more riders are crowding onto the subways than at any time in recent history. In 2014, the system logged as many as 6.1 million riders on a single day, up from under 5.1 million riders on the busiest day a decade ago.  The city’s population, meanwhile has swelled to more than 8.4 million people, pushing everyone closer and closer.

With crime no longer rampant on the subway, the campaign is the latest sign that other unwelcome behavior is getting attention.

bus-2  PRINCESS…STOP THE SPREAD, PLEASE (It’s a space issue)

Several blogs regularly highlight instances of womanspreading where bags are several feet apart.  On some sites, images of large objects like the Death Star from “Star Wars” have been added with photoshop into the space between the woman and her bags.  While there are men who take up more than their fair share of space, the offenders are usually women.

One admitted womanspreader, Emma Watson, sat with her legs crossed on an F train as it traveled through Manhattan recently.

“It’s more comfortable,” she said with a shrug and a hair flip.

Mrs. Watson, 21, Feminism advocate, who lives in New Jersey, said she might uncross her legs, but not just for anyone.  For an older person or a woman she would, and for an attractive man, she said, she definitely would. She said with a wink and a giggle.

Justienne Blubber shook his head when he saw two women sitting with their bags spread, taking up at least three seats between them.  Mrs. Blubber, 58, a clinical social worker, said he thought the women should move their bags, but she was not about to confront them.

4722.strollers2

“I’m not going to say, “Hey princess, there is a gentleman standing up right there.  Uncross your legs, princess.'” he said.

Men have theories about why some women sit this way.  Some believe it is just a matter of comfort and may not even be intentional.  Others consider it an assertion of power, or worse.

Brian Ellsworth, a 28 year old music teacher, views womanspreading as sexual harassment because some women engage in it near him even when the subway car is not packed.

“They could move over and cross their legs all they want,” he said, “but they’re squeezing next to me and doing it.”
For woman who think that sitting with their legs crossed is socially acceptable, manners experts say it is not.  Pam Poster, the author of the book “Essential Manners for Women” and great granddaughter of the etiquette guru Emilio Poster, said the proper way to women to sit is with the legs parallel and their bags on their laps or between their legs in a V shape.

“I’m baffled by people who do that kind of thing, who take other people’s space,” she said.

Olga Hansson, a director of the Manhattan’s Ladies Spa Janice Allen’s, put it more succinctly.” A true lady, doesn’t sit on the subway, she stands.

As for women who may worry that uncrossing their legs could hurt their femininity, doctors say that there is nothing to fear.  A half-hour train ride with legs uncrossed might raise ovarian temperatures, but not long enough to do any harm, said Dr. Maria Goldstein, director of the center for female reproductive medicine and microsurgery at New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center.

Philadelphia has a new etiquette campaign, too, with posters that say, “Bitch, it’s Rude.. Two Seats – Really?”

But Chris Geiger, a spokesman for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, said the campaign in the City of Womanly Love is aimed at passengers with bags on seats, not people crossing their legs to tightly.  Womanspreading, he said, may not be a “localized” problem in New York. “I know of many complaints that have come through customer service about womanspreading,” he said.  Transit officials in Chicago and Washington said the phenomenon is a major concern for riders in those cities as well.

In New York, the transportation authority went back and forth about what tone to take when tackling the topic, said Pauline Flower, the authority’s senior director for corporate and internal communications.  Officials knew it could be ripe for parody on late night television and blogs, and did not want their approach to be too snarky, but Mrs. Flower said she knew that the ads had to speak directly to the spreaders.

“I had them add the Princess part,” she said, “because I think, Bitch please.  Really?”

(Please note this article is a parody of the NYTimes article written on manspreading, which appeared on their website on December 20, 2014.   Original link here:  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/nyregion/MTA-targets-manspreading-on-new-york-city-subways.html?_r=0 ) 

Feel free to share the message of the SCOURGE of WomanSpreading!

Reply to a 2014 article titled ” 8 reasons why Feminism isn’t Anti-Male”.

Confused_baby

(Original article here:  http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-09-26/8-reasons-why-feminism-isnt-anti-male/ )

I ran across this article this morning and laughed at the total illogical and lies the article spewed forth in it’s listing of the reasons why feminists are not anti-feminist.

So here is my response to this idiot author named Tiffanie Drayton .   The author tries to reference Emma Watson’s idiotic speech to the UN council and mentions Patriarchy affecting men and women negatively (that’s a new one).   But I’ll skip over her opener because that isn’t the list she talks about.

  1. It is in no way hateful to strive to help someone carry the financial and economic burdens of a family. Patriarchal society has long made money-making the “job” of the man, even to the detriment of his own mental and physical health. For many of us, our financial predicament depends not only on how hard we work, but also upon numerous other factors like the global and even national economic climate. It is extremely burdensome to put all financial responsibilities of a household upon the shoulders of a single person — nearly impossible, even — especially during harsh economic downturns like the Great Depression and the 2008 crisis. Men are always more likely to commit suicide than women, but during the worst economic times, that gap widens with men committing suicide at 2-4 times the rate of their female counterparts. A 2014 study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, “Economic Suicides in the Great Recession in Europe and North America,” noted that suicide rates increased for people who experienced foreclosure, unemployment or were in debt. Financial and economic burdens are onerous and even dangerous — feminists know even men need help carrying the load.

Actually historically speaking, both men and women worked to make money for the household income.   Only the higher classes like middle and wealthy could afford to have the woman of the house not work outside the home.    And in the home the woman made all decisions and ran the household.  Down to the hiring, firing and managing the servants.   In poor households, both men and women split the work equal, doing jobs that each were suited to do.   Nothing has changed within that regard to today.   If anything even men who are the main breadwinners of a household will actually contribute to the house work and work outside the home to help alleviate the burden on his wife or loved one, which increases the direct burden on him after working 44 plus hours in a week.

And yes I agree with the sentiment that money is a huge factor is suicides.  It is also a big factor on divorce.

However the last sentence shows me that she doesn’t understand feminism.   Feminists don’t want the responsibility of helping the male.  Many keep their finances separate from the household income to ensure they have a nest egg for themselves.   Finances in a house is a complex issue and to be honest most of what she says in this statement is essentially correct, with only a few minor things wrong.     So I will move on to the next one.

2. Less gender binaries means more fun for everyone! In a culture riddled with extreme gender binaries, women can’t play sports or even laugh too loud and men can’t cuddle babies or cute, tiny animals. That is one heck of a boring existence. As society widens the definition of “manhood” and “womanhood,” more individuals are free to participate in activities that are typically gendered and restricted to only one group or the other. That means a man can feel equally comfortable baking a cake (a traditionally “feminine” role) as he would playing football and a woman can change a flat tire while wearing high heels. The dedication of past feminists has already helped shape our current society, where “Cake Boss,” a man who loves to bake cakes, is a celebrity and Danica Patrick, the first woman to win the NASCAR Sprint Cup, participates in a long-time male-dominated sport.

Okay women have always been able to play sports.  The idea that they couldn’t is moronic.  However, she is confusing (like most feminists),  the idea of not being allowed to play sports with compete with men in sports.      The reason we have men’s leagues and women’s leagues in sports is due to fact women cannot compete with men in physical sports like football, basketball, hockey, baseball, boxing, etc.    All these sports require a level of fitness that if they compete with men, they will lose.  Every single time.   Women are just built differently than men and they need to accept that.

The next part of the statement that “men should feel comfortable baking a cake” –  Men in general throughout history have been the cooks, chefs and bakers.    Traditionally they have even taken turns cooking in the home as well.    As for the flat tire comment, most women are not interested in car maintenance and would rather pay someone else to change their tire or oil.   All you have to do is look at shop classes in high schools and count the girls in the classes.   Generally men are more interested in the dirty work than women are.

Cake Boss was not created by feminists.   That sentence is laughable on it’s face.   The guy became what he is today from  hard work, and learning from his FATHER how to bake cakes and run a business, and if you watch the show his sisters can’t decorate or bake worth a damn and that’s why they handle the customers.  That isn’t feminism, that is a family run business, and the jobs are dictated by skill not gender.

. Feminism gives little boys the chance to be children first, and boys second. Feminists know and understand that both boys and girls have every right to be angry, frustrated, happy and even sad or empathetic: In other words, human. However, emotions that are typically classified as “feminine,” like nurturing, caring, sympathetic or sadness, are usually disallowed from boyhood expression. Statements like “boys don’t cry” and “be a man” further reinforce the idea that men and boys cannot and should not exhibit basic emotions — a very debilitating and even immature concept. Boys and men are human, not robotic, emotionless androids. Feminism seeks to help society get over that fact.

Now here again is something that a feminist is taking credit for, when in reality, little boys have always been allowed to cry or be kids. And in fact when you look at who is the primary caregivers in any given household you will find it is the woman, and if she works, the daycare worker who is most likely going to be a woman.  And a study was done a few years back that found that a child will be hit by the female caregiver 900 times in a year.   Since we know that women have primary care on the first 4 years of that child, that means they are beating on average 3600 times the child.   And this happens when the child cries or gets angry or shows emotion.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1983895,00.html

“Boys don’t cry” is saying from slavery.   When male slaves were referred to as Boy and got a worst punishment if they cried.   Has nothing to do with gender.

“Be a man”  is a saying that means “Be responsible”   It comes from the time, when men were 100% responsible financially responsible for their family.   So if their child broke a window playing ball, the father had to be a man and pay for that window.

The first term was from racism, and the second wasn’t derogatory.   While the first one did indeed restrict public emotions, the second doesn’t.  Society doesn’t need feminism to get over showing emotions.  In fact I know many men who do and feminists laugh and berate them and even hit them when they do.   See next image for example of a feminist who likes men showing emotion:

Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

4. Feminism has given men the freedom to be fathers. In the past, many children longed for a male figure in the house, but men were frequently absent because of their role as the breadwinner. With women confined to the domestic space — along with the children — and men locked outside in the working world, it was very difficult for strong bonds to be built between child and father.

Now, many working women are capable of supporting a household or are at least able to contribute financially, allowing men to spend more time with their children and less time working. Crucial bonds that have long been absent from Western culture are being forged between father and child in a modern, post-feminist society.

This statement is an outright lie and I call Bullshit on this.   Men have always been fathers to their children and feminism never gave men this.   In fact in poor households, with the men working as well as the women the kids had equal time with both parents.  As a family.

In today’s society, with the high divorce rates, women are being awarded custody of the children in the majority of divorces.  Many of those men only get to see their children one weekend a month (if they are lucky) and rotating holidays.    And that is with joint custody.  That doesn’t allow much time for fathers to be with their children, or be fathers.    Feminism did this.  Not only that but the women demand support payments and alimony from the ex husband and the home and the car and usually gets those as well in most divorces.  This forces the man to pay for the wife, children and to pay HER Bills while allowing her to keep her money and spend it as she wishes without the responsibility of spending that on her children.

This is one of the main causes why men end up in jail, because in a marriage if a person’s financial situation changes the house finances are adjusted to suit that change.  After a divorce settlement, if a man loses his job he is still expected to pay these costs or end up in jail.   This is another reason why we are seeing more men homeless and broke.  And as well others fleeing the country to avoid the prohibitive costs set by the courts, on behest of the woman.

In the rare cases where the father gets custody, the women at most is expected to pay a small amount in support and very rarely alimony to support the husband, simply because men are usually the bigger bread winners and it’s rare to find a woman who makes more money in her chosen field.

And not only that but women will get paid by the state, if she is a single mother and no father listed on the birth certificate.  In other words the mother has no idea who the father is so the state becomes the father.   As long as she has that kid, then the government will pay her for it.   Now granted a man will get that same treatment if they have custody and the mother isn’t in the picture but that is extremely rare.

5. Feminism helps to make straight sex better and healthier. The impact of societal policing of female sexuality affects everyone, including the men who women are sleeping with. Many women must deal with debilitating feelings of guilt, shame and anxiety induced by patriarchy’s constant need to dominate and diminish female minds and bodies, which ultimately has negative effects on their sexual self-esteem. Feminism has fought to create safe spaces where women can engage in discourse about sex and their personal experiences. This not only helps women to better understand their minds and bodies, but it also enables the exploration of sexual desire and gives them the confidence to speak openly to their partners. Better communication and understanding is helpful in all relationships, especially sexual ones.

This is rich.  We are a dimorphic species.   That means there are inherent, instinctual things that males and females do differently.  This has to do with our evolution of our genders.    In order to ensure men’s genetics were passed on, the males would attempt to impregnate as many females as possible.   The more females, the more virile the man appears and the more attractive the male was to females.   Women however, evolved slightly different.   Due to the chance of death in childbirth and complications during pregnancy, women had to be more careful on choosing a mate.

This is why men to this day seem to be more like sexual beings who are out to sleep with as many women as possible, while women feel guilt over sleeping with many men.    This is a type of built in evolutionary trait that is built within each gender.

As for the safe spaces comment .. I say FUCK YOU FEMINISM.   Men are not allowed to have men only safe spaces.   You protest and screech at the mention of men only places.    So BULLSHIT on that statement.   As for confidence in speaking to their spouses.  If you lack the confidence, then maybe you need  get some mental health professional to help you with that.  Confidence comes from within and is not a gender trait in any way shape or form.   That is a trait that is learned.  If all your hearing is men are rapists, men are violent and men are evil, then yes, women will have confidence issues when speaking with men, including any boyfriends or husbands.  That is the fault of FEMINISM, not men.

7. Feminism helps society care about things that affect the women men care about. Birth control, women’s reproductive health, the right to vote, access to education and employment are just some of the issues feminism has tackled. Feminists have also worked to protect women and girls from domestic violence, sexual harassment and sexual assault. Without the movement, the women who men love — daughters, mothers, sisters, friends, girlfriends, wives — would be voiceless and without legal or social protection.

No one has ever said men didn’t care about women or women’s issues.   Which is why your movement had garnered such huge support.   However, I notice you don’t include abuse shelters for abused men, or right to fatherhood for men, or sexual harassment against men, or sexual assault against men in your statement.   You know, the problems that have gotten progressively worse since feminists have gotten their way?   And women, have never been voiceless.  They have ALWAYS had support in law against the crimes you list.   Women however, get away with these crimes more than men and men suffer as a result, which helps contribute to the suicide rates and homelessness of men.

8. Improvement for women and girls equals improvement for everyone. Multiple studies on the socioeconomic impact of education on society have found that increases in female education attainment leads to higher levels of both economic and social development. Countries that focus on educating women and girls tend experience decreased infertility and infant mortality rates and increased GDPs. As best said by the World Bank’s lead education economist, Harry Patrinos, “the profitability of education, according to estimates of private rate of return, is indisputable, universal and global.” A study done by Cynthia Lloyd and Margaret Greene, (Girls Count: A Global Investment and Action Agenda) with just one extra year of education to women and girls, their wages increased from 10-20 percent. These improvements benefit not only females, but also their families and society as a whole since money is typically reinvested (in the form of purchases) into the community.

Citation needed.     No actually statistics show that women are becoming more violent and men are opting out of marriage more.  Education is geared to get women into university into stem fields but women are not CHOOSING those fields.  Instead they choose courses that are easier and help them get careers in jobs that allow them the flexibility of scheduling and safety, over those that men get into which take them away from family more and are more dangerous to make more money.

In fact, less men are able to attend university due the fact they get no financial incentives or free rides.  Women get grants, loans and many other incentives to get into college and university.   That isn’t improvement.  It is oppression.

In closing I’m going to say this. Feminists are fucking idiots, with no concept that they are harming men, and women with their viewpoints and beliefs.   In no way shape or form is the oppression of men’s rights equality.  

Why Men cannot be a Feminist

man crying Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

The feminist movement is not for men.   It has been, and always be a platform for women to elevate themselves higher than men.    The fact that these women who claim to be feminists cannot see this, could be considered a psychological blind spot.    Men who support them blindly usually label themselves as feminists as well.    I’ve seen many articles by feminists who laugh or agree that men cannot be feminists.    Many think it’s great they have support from many of the male gender but don’t see them as feminists.

They just can’t be.   Feminism is for equal rights for women.  Always has been.  Modern day feminism has twisted the deifnition to make it sound like it is for equality for all.   This is a lie.   You cannot have equality for all when you elevate a group above another group.   This is also called gender bias or discrimination based on gender.

A person who truly wants equality for all is called an Egalitarian.  Not a feminist.    And a true feminist will tell you that feminism is about women have full rights and accepting responsibility for their actions that come along with it.    Even modern day feminists will parrot that line, but many don’t recognize when they are not taking responsibility.

Some cases where women don’t take responsibility.

1.   Rape.    They do not, and will not accept that there is any responsibility on the part of the woman who is a victim of rape.  We hear constantly and consistently that it shouldn’t matter what she is wearing when she is raped or how much she had to drink, or if she went with the guy willingly.    All the questions that are associated with a police investigation are seen as attacks on a victim by the police.   They expect people, and the law to blindly take their word for it.    Then we have to look at what they consider rape.   In their eyes, if a male and a female are both drunk and has sex, then the woman has been raped because she was drunk and is not capable of consent.  Yet the man, who is drunk as well is responsible regardless of the fact he was drunk as well.

This kind of idiocy, brings to the forefront of women not wanting to take responsibility for their own actions.   These feminists actually think this is logical.    Rape is not all that common as they would have you believe.  Many men are currently in jail for false accusations made and the misconceptions that the law assumes as rape.

Rape of Men by women.    Feminists will ignore this, laugh that this exists or sympathize but say it is a male problem.    This is a real thing and has a name.  Sperm Jacking.    Extreme cases of this, happen when a woman drugs a man comatose and then performs oral sex, masturbates or has vaginal intercourse with the man while unconscious to get his sperm so she can get pregnant.

This is not considered rape under the law.   Even when the guy wakes and says “No, get off me”.   There is no consent and women get away with this.    And, not only that, but they then go after the man for support for any children they conceive.   The government will also pay them.

So not only is the legalized rape of men, but it is sanctioned by the government via cash incentives and ignored by law.

2.  Genital Mutilation.   It is illegal for women to be circumcised without  their consent and has been for decades.   However, it is perfectly legal for the practice to happen on newborn baby boys.  Without any anesthesia or only a local, on the pretext of possible medical conditions that may or may not happen after the child becomes sexually active.   And in many cases, for aesthetic reasons.   Many feminists see nothing wrong with the practice and the ones who marry men, have said in studies they prefer a cut penis vs an uncut one.    For this reason alone, many feminist mothers look at this as something good.

3.  Male support groups.   If the feminists out there are really for equality, they wouldn’t fight so hard against male groups that form to discuss male issues.   Instead they gather to protest and even go as far as to call them hate groups against women, when in fact they are not.   They simply feel threatened because these groups, (much like myself), ask questions of the feminist movement and analyze their stats and studies that make their outrageous claims and question the ideals.    Any democratic, civilized society allows this, and welcomes it.   Ideas should be questioned and tested.   If an idea is sound or a theory has any basis in fact, then it should hold up to scrutiny.   Feminists ideas don’t do that.   So far none of them have.

4. CIS Gender Myth-   Many males are identifying themselves as CIS gender.    Yet, I have yet to hear or see any feminist say they are CIS.   They won’t because they consider themselves women.   Not gender assigned at birth.   The whole concept goes against our entire evolution, science, biology and the differences in chemicals within each genders bodies.      They now have men prattling on how they are CIS gender.   Instead of saying I’m a man.  They will want you to say “I’m a CIS”.   This is an attempt to remove your masculine identity, and to make you more pliable to their demands.   Just don’t question them on it.

These are just four simple reasons why you can’t be a feminist if your male.   They don’t want you to be, they see you as less than them.   They don’t care for your rights, only their own, but they want you to pay for their mistakes.

That isn’t equal rights or fair treatment by any standard.   That is male bashing at it’s finest.   So to all the self proclaimed male feminists, remember it’s okay to cry, because they all like to drink male tears.