New Mental Disorder Discovered- IVD

Bipolar Disorder1

 

I have discussions with people both online and in real life about current affairs, politics, activism, and more.     Many people are passionate about what they are discussing and as such, I really don’t mind when the discussion or debate gets heated.    If both people understand that the discussion or debate is just that, then you can have a heated debate without taking it personally.

However, many people out there are unable to cope with this idea and do take things personally.   And those people tend to be the worst.   Especially some of the commentators on social media sites.   Instead of saying something constructive or conducive to the debate or discussion at hand, they of course, resort to name calling or attacking someone for stating something they have every right to state.     And instead of being civilized they become these lunatics with an axe to grind.

After decades of being active online,  I can spot these people very easily.   They try to come off as some sort of moral authority on their opinion and attack someone by using slurs that sound racist and bigoted.   Then when you confront them they invariably turn their ire on you when you defend yourself or a friend  from them.   When that doesn’t work and their argument falls apart they then try to slander you to try to get you to move away from the topic at hand in hopes that you will defend yourself from their offensive and then finally claim victim status saying you are the aggressor while they are the poor victim.

This happens almost daily online with people.   They think that being offended by something they see online gives them the automatic moral right to attack people, and when they are defended against, they pretend to be victims of abuse online.    There are many people out there who do this.   I see many feminists, SJWs and liberals who do this.

New Disorder….??

This is what I call the Infantile Victim Disorder or IVD.   You get an IVD when you have a warped set of beliefs that cause you to believe there is a mysterious patriarchy made up of old white men out to get you.    Or that you think you are superior to the other person due to their body parts.  And even due to a skin tone that is not considered Caucasian.

Symptoms include,  being “triggered“.  Using the word Problematic,  and telling men they have male privilege or the other variant if you are a person of another color,  having white male privilege.

Other symptoms may include:   Obesity, Poverty, Neon color in hair, getting undressed in public to march against rape, yelling and spitting on men at university, submitting false rape claims, false reports of sexual assault.  Raping men.  Being the aggressor in domestic violence.  Lesbianism.

If you suspect you have IVD, please go see a psychiatrist immediately.     Usually sufferers of IVD also have Bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and project their issues and blame others for problems that don’t exist or are the cause of the sufferer’s own actions.

Advertisements

Example of blaming others for their own insecurities.

I recently read another article on wordpress by someone who decided to write about how people who have privelege feel oppressed when the people that they have been oppressing get equal treatment.

The article if you care to read can be found here:
When You’re Accustomed To Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression

The problem with ideology like this is the fact it is based on the idea that White man oppressor  Everyone else good victim.

The writer also runs under the feminist ideology.   This ideology is based on the idea that if you don’t have any self doubt or don’t think that the reason you didn’t get a job due to your skin color is a  privilege.    The writer, like most feminists believe white people, or rather white men, don’t have self doubt about getting jobs based on skin color, gender or  even sexual orientation.     Which of course is the problem, simply because we are all human beings and we all experience self doubt about things, especially when they are not going our way.

The writer makes bold statements that white people are angry at being called racist for saying racist things or having racist beliefs.     I myself have been accused of this by a few black people.   Why?  The reason I’m a so called racist by black people is purely retarded.   It’s because I don’t date black people.     That’s it.    That so far has been the only reason.   The writer of this article shows very clearly that they are racist in their thought processes.  They constantly insinuate racial issues, and stereotypes etc.

Now while I don’t deny racism does exist, I don’t see it as the problem it was back in the 50’s.     This person, like all who follow the feminist ideology of victim-hood believe they are victims somehow.  Even when they are not.

The idea that not having any doubts about a job interview is called confidence.  That isn’t a privilege.  That is actually a trait of someone who is mentally stable and balanced.   Even if you have doubt as to why you didn’t get the job, that just means you have doubt or self confidence issues.   Which is actually normal for most people.   Even I have experienced this, and I am a white guy.    White males do experience self doubt.   One job that I interviewed for a very long time ago, I didn’t get.  I was told by the HR team I was qualified, but they had given to a female.   That caused me to have self doubt, did I not get the job because of my gender?

The writer also states “I had had enough. I kept thinking “Why am I always moving out of this guy’s way?” Just about everyone else in the world seemed to agree that if two people were walking toward each other, both people would acquiesce a little…”  

I don’t know what part of the world the person is from but if two people are walking towards each other one person always moves out of the way.   Sometimes both.   Not always though.     Why he thinks that being nice and moving out of the other person’s way is a bad thing is  part of a larger issue.

I understand that being nice all the time has it’s limits and sometimes you just want to say fuck it and push your way through.  But that doesn’t mean you were privileged if someone else moves out of the way.  That just means you are a courteous person.  That is it.

Privilege boils down to this:

Privilege is something that can be given to you and can be taken away.  For example, a privilege , like your laptop you received from daddy at Christmas.   If you do something wrong daddy can take that laptop away from you as punishment.   Removing the privilege.
In other words, privilege comes from outside of yourself, is something that can be taken away by others. 

Thinking that you might have not gotten a job is not privilege in any way shape or form.  It just isn’t.   That is self confidence issues stemming from your own conscious or unconscious desires and not getting those desires fulfilled.

Moral is, if you have a doubt as to why something did not happen or why it happened, don’t go blaming others for your confidence issues.   Think to yourself what YOU could have done to have been offered the job or gotten the better shifts.   And maybe, just maybe the other person they hired or gave those shifts to were actually better than you.

After all, you can think you are better all you want, but the reality is the only person who is qualified to know is the owner or manager of the job.  They are the ones who hire you or do the scheduling and know exactly what kind of performance they need.    Not You.

Grow the fuck up people.

Toronto Gay Pride Supports Hate, Racism and Sexism.

20110627-prideflag08

Gay Pride Toronto has overstepped itself.  It is being run by a committee of feminists who use their authority to discriminate on the basis of gender, religion, race etc.    I’ve watched the gay pride parades in major cities across Canada and Toronto’s is the worst for this.    One year they banned a group that supported Palestine, but allowed Jewish groups to join it.    Next year they will be allowing a racist activist group head the parade (Black lives Matter), and today I read on CBC, that the Sexist Feminist PM Justin Trudeau be part of it.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/trudeau-toronto-pride-1.3459052?cmp=rss
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/02/10/black-lives-matter-pride-parade_n_9201614.html

I’m all for equality and inclusiveness.  I really am, but when you ban legitimate groups on the basis of a political view, gender, or sexuality then it breaks Canadian law and is discrimination.

Gay Pride Toronto is rife with discriminatory practices.   Last year they banned CAFE from marching, because a few feminists within the Pride Committee deemed them a hate group without proof but based on complaints from feminists.

https://nowtoronto.com/news/think-free-blog/mens-rights-group-banned-from-marching-in-pride/

It’s time to stop discriminating against people, and using the parade to discriminate.   This is not what I fought for as a gay man.   I fought in the 90s for equality and rights.   Not the right to discriminate .    Nor did I advocate for groups that do discriminate.

Equality for all.   Not for some, Gay Pride.

If you are reading this Pride Committee or City of Toronto, and disagree with me then you have lost your way.

Time to Boycott or ban it people.

Dear World, Justin Trudeau doesn’t represent Canada.

Dear World Population,

First I would like to thank you for reading my open letter.   I know that you are busy, so I will try to keep this short.

Justin Trudeau does not represent Canada.     Yes I know, he is the PM of the crown corporation of Canada, and claims he is the representative.    However, I will state this.   He does not represent the values, nor the ideals of the majority of Canadians.

How can he be the PM then you ask?    Good question.   First, and foremost, the majority didn’t vote for him.   Believe it!

The problem with our voting system is our leaders are chosen years in advance.   The media manipulates their audience with back and forth promotions to make it seem like it is a fair and honest election.     As I have written in the past about elections  and the process I won’t get into here, except that our votes don’t matter and that we do not live in a democracy.    If we did the people’ who removed their votes would be counted.   In this country though, the people who don’t vote are left behind.     In reality only a very small percentage of the Canadian population actually voted in the last election and of them an even smaller number voted liberal.

You see in our country, we are forced to vote for a party, not an individual.   So if you like the candidates objectives in your riding and vote for them then the party gets the seats in parliament.   This means that the person who is head of that party gets to be PM of the country.      If you don’t like the leader of the party but feel the only there is one candidate who falls in with your values or ideas of how the country should be run but hate the leader of that party, you really only have 2 choices.  Vote anyway or not vote at all.    Last election, the major portion of the population didn’t vote.

Now I know what your thinking.   “Then vote and make a difference”.   It doesn’t matter.   After speaking with Elections Canada, they informed me that even if only 10 people in the whole country voted then then we would still have a PM and the government would still run.

That is NOT a democracy.

So again, Justin Trudeau does not represent Canadians or our values.    His mindset is of third wave feminism which is about elevating women, giving them things like money, jobs, opportunities simply based on their gender instead of actually earning those things.

Recently he called for all Canadian’s to “embrace feminism and not be scared of it”.     This caused an uproar in the comment section of every media source that printed an article about this.

Canadians’ do not like third wave feminism.    Canadians believe in real equality, not the brand of equality that takes from men who have earned their money, job etc, and giving to to women simply because they are women.        This brand of feminism goes against the original brand of feminism that was about women having the right to work along side men and earn the same money and the same promotions as men.    Not be handed those positions, without earning or working for it, simply based on the the anatomy.

The original feminists who fought back in the 60’s speak out against this current crop of so called feminism.

In this country we believe in fair treatment.   We believe if you work hard in your career, and put in the time, sweat and tears into your job then you deserve and should move up the ladder.    You don’t get handed the board of directors position simply because you have a degree in gender studies.

To listen to our PM and see his efforts on behalf of feminism you would think we are all feminists, and we are definitely not.     It’s time to call out third wave feminism by all.  Time to call out the PM for pandering only to an ideal that puts men less than women instead of on equal footing.    It’s time to shout down this nonsense from all sources, and stop this before it really becomes harmful on our society.

Canada used to be peacekeepers, and the majority of us still believe we can be this again.
Canada used to be accepting of other cultures and groups.    We believe we can be this again.

Canada used to accept all religions and faiths and we believe we can be this again.

Don’t let Justin Trudeau’s  face fool you.    He is on a leash being controlled by third wave feminism, and he doesn’t speak for us.

And Justin, if you are reading this, understand this, you are a tool for the feminists.   You are not a feminist.   They will throw you under the bus the minute you are no longer a use to  them.    A man cannot be a feminist, that is like a black person supporting the slavery of black people.    Stop pandering to them and start representing Canada.  The real Canada.    Otherwise you may lose your job.

The Era of Stupid People….

We have gone into an era where stupid people are in the majority, thanks to previous generations who decided that spanking was bad for kids, giving ribbons for participation or just showing up for class to make the students feel good about themselves.     A generation of helicopter parents who balked and turn white at the very thought of their child going outside alone to play, or catching a normal, childhood illness.

We have kids now, who thanks to the removal of cursive writing in grade schools are unable to sign their own name.   They can type it, but can’t even hold a pencil the right way, let alone sign their name.

College students are going into school not knowing how to cook or clean for themselves, because their mothers didn’t teach them or did it all for them.

We have these same people who are now voting age voting idiots like this one below:

trudeau_transparency_20140611

Who think it’s okay to discriminate against his own gender because of his upbringing and to please his wife and her friends.    To pander to special interest groups and discriminate and call it equality.

Yes, my friends, we live in an age of stupid people.   The same people who believe what they get told in the news at face value when a quick search online and a few documents to read will say otherwise.

These are the same people who scoff at people who do the research and can back their facts with evidence and proof.   That doesn’t matter though, because then these stupid people decide that you need to be censored and try to assert that what you are saying is an attack against them personally and hate.

We have the same people who cannot recognize freedom and think freedom is having no choice, and no right to say no to a government.   The idea that you have to give up freedom to have it, or that silly thing called freedom of speech is fine as long it doesn’t go against your ideas.

Beware, the more stupidity is not called out and tolerated, the more the lies are perpetuated and passed on to new generations.

Take responsibility for your children, teach them yourself, don’t let others do it for you, because otherwise you end up with what we have today.

Looking at Reality … We are not our jobs.

We as a human race like to label things, especially people.   We categorize (even I do it), to the point that we now identify people as non-objects.

For example, in my profession, I go out and take photos of people, places, and things.    I call myself a photographer.   However, I do not see myself as a photographer.  That is a profession and is something I do.   Many people fall into this trap of thinking of themselves as this or that.

Judges, Doctors, Lawyers, are notorious for this.  They believe those little abbreviated letters they add to their names, and business cards is who they are.    When you ask any of these people, “Who do you think you are?”   They will almost always respond with “Well, I’m a Doctor of course”, instead of “Well I’m a human being”.    No one ever says that.   And no one thinks it anymore.    Even judges are under a delusion that they are a “court” when issuing a contempt of court order for something trivial like a defendant speaking to something that the judge doesn’t like directly.  One example I witnessed, was a defendant saying the judge was  a dickhead, and the judge stated that he was in contempt for insulting the court, when the reality was the judge was the one being offended, not the court, but due to the delusional nature of status, the judge as all judges do, believe they are a room.

The idea of status originates with social classes and those abbreviations somehow make you seem better than your fellow human beings.   It confers to many that they are smarter  than those without the letters.   That they have some secret special knowledge that only those with the same letters after their names somehow can understand.

Which is why you get people, like the pro vaccination people (The ones who need a professional in the medical field to inform them of safety of medicine), scoff at the anti-vaccination people (the ones who have actually done their homework themselves),  or the people who are against the ideology of feminism, vs the people who are feminists who blindly believe their gender studies professors at their word, because their professor has a PHD.

The idea that status confers some special intelligence is a fallacy that needs to be questioned at every point.   It doesn’t matter what class you are.  That is another label that just divides us.

People in many cases are stupid, and yes I do mean this.   They fall for these delusions much in the same way a prisonor will start to associate with their captors, even to the point of defending the captors.    This the the state of delusion that the majority is in.

They think of themselves as this, or that but never as human.   That would be bad, because it removes their status and makes them the same as everyone else in the world, the same level.

And of course those people want to be better thought of than everyone else.

Facing reality is a trigger for some people….

cosmic-dust

Today I got into an argument with some SJW’s on Facebook who actually were praising someone, and condemning anyone who spoke negatively about the man.   The whole thing started with news reports of a train hitting a tow truck that was parked on railroad tracks in between signal lights and those arms that come down when a train is approaching. In other words, right on the tracks.

(Original story here:  http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/10/30/1-dead-after-go-train-hits-tow-truck.html )

The tow truck driver had parked his car at a scene of a collision and was directing traffic to “be safe”. Unaware he had parked his tow truck right on the tracks.    Then ten minutes after arriving, a train was coming.

Now common sense screams that you move away from the parked truck.    No, this guy ran to his truck and got in, in an futile notion to move it off the tracks.  However, the truck was blocked by those arms that drop to stop traffic when trains approach, and so the guy didn’t even have time to get out and the train collided with the truck, killing the driver.

Thankfully, the passengers on that train were unharmed.   Shaken for sure, but unharmed.

Now, back to social justice warriors.    The made a derogatory comment about some firefighter who on his own personal social media account has stated the tow truck driver was an idiot for parking on the tracks.    The SJWs were making statements that  the firefighter should be fired etc.   (Cause, you know, we can’t have free speech).

I decided to jump in and give my two cents, (because I exercise my free speech as you all know).   My first volley in the comments was the firefighter is right.   This was a completely avoidable situation and the driver was an idiot for not using common sense.   Every single person knows not to park on railroad tracks.    Every year people die from being on railroad tracks, but of course this was the wrong answer.    The person who posted stated that a person who works as a firefighter should not be making statements that are negative and was ignorant for doing so.

First and foremost anyone who uses the word ignorant in that context is not understanding what that word means.  It actually means you are not educated on subject, typically the subject your speaking on  etc.    And I would say, that the firefighter is more qualified to say it than some housewife/social justice warrior, since fire fighter are high trained and are typically first respond-er to crisis situations.    And I said so.

This was when things got interesting and typical.  Her friends decided to jump in and defend the housewife’s comment and again called for the firefighter to be fired.  Simply because he said something they perceived as negative.   However the friend added by calling me a derogatory name and telling me Karma will bite me on the ass for saying something negative against the dead.

Reality of the situation of the truck driver is this.   He chose to park on the tracks, in between the arms, instead of somewhere safe.  By doing this he put every single person on that trains life at risk, and possibly cause derailment, death and destruction.

Instead we got lucky and only one person died from this event that was avoidable.

The idea that we can’t talk realistically about situations is wrong.   I will never stop talking the truth, and I refuse to wear rose colored glasses.   The housewife in question is also a mom of 5 kids.  So of course she had to bring that up and stated that she didn’t want her kids to have to live in a world with negativity, and then in typical fashion she unfriended me.   Now in their defense, I had enough of this nonsense because the idiocy of their commentary was astounding because it put zero blame on the tow truck driver, and when the name calling started I finished it by calling the one friend of the housewife what she was in reality, a Cunty Bitch.

in their world, it’s full of precious snowflakes, and unicorns and nothing ever goes wrong and when someone points out reality, they get mad, stomp their little feet, and cry.

Spoiled children.

Justin Trudeau is now Prime Minister of Canada. – What does this mean?

trudeau_transparency_20140611

What exactly does this mean?   It means absolutely nothing.   Trudeau is not the leader of the Canadian government.  Neither was Harper.   They are figure heads.  Meant to persuade you that you that they are in charge, when in reality.  They are not.

Never in our history has any prime minister made any changes.   His father, was the figure head who everyone praised like a god, but never once considered the long term harm he would do, and did.

Justin, born with a silver spoon up his butt, but with the good looks like people flock to, has no value.

Will anything change?   Not in the slightest.

The government will allow the spying on it’s own people, without any oversight or warrants.
The government will continue to raise taxes.
The government will continue to have scandals.

Here are some of Trudeau’s campaign promises:

Mr. Trudeau has promised that half of a Liberal cabinet would be women.
(This can NOT be fulfilled unless women step up and are qualified.)

Promising unions $750 million for skilled trades funding.
(This can be fulfilled but where does that money come from?  From the taxpayers of course.  And since the government is in debt, then they would have to raise taxes.)

Add $515 million in funding for first nations education.
(While this is a noble promise, it ignores the fact that canada has no money to do this.  Raise taxes.)

Lower the federal income tax rate to 20.5 per cent on incomes between $44,700 and $89,401, paying for it by raising taxes on the wealthiest one per cent. Bring in a new, tax-free child benefit to replace the Conservative universal child benefit.

(What Justin fails to understand is the wealthy one percent couldn’t cover the cost the loss of income tax the drop would cause.   The middle class in canada is the largest class.   The top one percent, couldn’t possibly cover the loss.   The man used to be a teacher and I shudder at the thought of his math skills).

Change labour laws to ensure that employees in federally regulated industries have the right to ask their bosses for flexible work hours.
(What this means is people (women) would be able to take more time off work to be with their family.  For example: a woman who now gets a year off maternity leave, would get to take even more time off, and be able to go back to work of and off as much as they want up to 18 months of time.  Per child.  That means if a woman has 3 children during her career, she would would be able to take up to four and a half years off.  And feminists are confused about the wage gap now, but they will freak out when the numbers start showing that in Canada the gap widens because of policies like this one if implemented.  Now I know he worded it “person”, which is due to the fact, he cannot discriminate, and so it sounds like men will be able to use this time as well, however, we know from history, that only a few men will benefit.  It will be the women who will be the major beneficiaries, not men.  So really this policy is sexist against men.)

Justin Trudeau has made so many election promises and all will cost money, but the money has to come from somewhere, so here are a few predictions:

Taxes will rise to the point the middle class will shrink, and the poor will grow.
The government will become more oppressive to it’s citizens.  We can even see TSA like systems put into place.  More family units will break down due to finances.
There will be a battle of the sexes in Canada.  Men against women.  Women demanding what men have, but not wanting to work for it.
And in future elections, people will blame the non voters for not stopping Trudeau from getting into power.   Just like they did with Harper, even though many of the complainers voted him in.

Stop being stupid people.   The government is a corporation, and they don’t care about you.  They have no obligation to protect you.  And since they have no legal obligation to protect you, they will do everything to scam you.

When is it okay to hit a woman?

man-hitting-woman

The answer is pretty simple but many women would disagree.    When a woman hits you, you hit back.     Violence is always wrong, but we as human beings have the right to defend ourselves from violence, even if that means using the same violence on our attacker.

Many woman, and I mean most women have used the idea of “It’s never okay to hit a woman” as a tool to be able to hit men.
Let’s first look at how that concept of “It’s never okay to hit a woman” idea came about.     We have to go back, to a time when women were thought of as the “weaker” sex.   Or rather, when everyone thought of them as the weaker sex.    We as men and even women considered it the men’s job to protect the women.  To this day, many women and men hold to this standard.

The problem now arises with feminists, and other women who claim that they can do anything a man can do, but better.  The women who claim they don’t need a man to protect them, or even the social justice warriors.

Society is now getting mixed messages.    We are taught (By woman) in our lives, that woman are strong and don’t need protection, and at the same time we are taught that it is never okay to hit a woman because she should be protected.

In today’s society, domestic abuse is roughly 50/50.   Men being the victims as much as women.   There are also millions of cases where women think it’s okay to slap a man for saying something they didn’t like, throwing things at a man when they get angry at them, or even destroy or damage property when they get angry.    Yet according to society and what we are taught since birth, we are not supposed to defend ourselves from these violent attacks if they are perpetrated by someone female.

woman-hitting-man-2915823

Enough is enough I say.   This type of thinking in our society creates a wrong message to the following generations.   If women want to be treated equally then they need to understand that having a vagina, does not give them free reign to hit men.    Men, if a woman hits you, then hit them back.   Defend yourself.   More men have died from domestic abuse than women have, simply because they have been under the belief that you shouldn’t hit a woman, even in self defense.    This is a societal construct that needs to be changed.

Ladies, if you hit a man, or anyone, expect to be hit back.   You cannot walk around hitting people period.

So to answer my original question….  If a woman hits you… HIT THEM BACK!

Reply to a 2014 article titled ” 8 reasons why Feminism isn’t Anti-Male”.

Confused_baby

(Original article here:  http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-09-26/8-reasons-why-feminism-isnt-anti-male/ )

I ran across this article this morning and laughed at the total illogical and lies the article spewed forth in it’s listing of the reasons why feminists are not anti-feminist.

So here is my response to this idiot author named Tiffanie Drayton .   The author tries to reference Emma Watson’s idiotic speech to the UN council and mentions Patriarchy affecting men and women negatively (that’s a new one).   But I’ll skip over her opener because that isn’t the list she talks about.

  1. It is in no way hateful to strive to help someone carry the financial and economic burdens of a family. Patriarchal society has long made money-making the “job” of the man, even to the detriment of his own mental and physical health. For many of us, our financial predicament depends not only on how hard we work, but also upon numerous other factors like the global and even national economic climate. It is extremely burdensome to put all financial responsibilities of a household upon the shoulders of a single person — nearly impossible, even — especially during harsh economic downturns like the Great Depression and the 2008 crisis. Men are always more likely to commit suicide than women, but during the worst economic times, that gap widens with men committing suicide at 2-4 times the rate of their female counterparts. A 2014 study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, “Economic Suicides in the Great Recession in Europe and North America,” noted that suicide rates increased for people who experienced foreclosure, unemployment or were in debt. Financial and economic burdens are onerous and even dangerous — feminists know even men need help carrying the load.

Actually historically speaking, both men and women worked to make money for the household income.   Only the higher classes like middle and wealthy could afford to have the woman of the house not work outside the home.    And in the home the woman made all decisions and ran the household.  Down to the hiring, firing and managing the servants.   In poor households, both men and women split the work equal, doing jobs that each were suited to do.   Nothing has changed within that regard to today.   If anything even men who are the main breadwinners of a household will actually contribute to the house work and work outside the home to help alleviate the burden on his wife or loved one, which increases the direct burden on him after working 44 plus hours in a week.

And yes I agree with the sentiment that money is a huge factor is suicides.  It is also a big factor on divorce.

However the last sentence shows me that she doesn’t understand feminism.   Feminists don’t want the responsibility of helping the male.  Many keep their finances separate from the household income to ensure they have a nest egg for themselves.   Finances in a house is a complex issue and to be honest most of what she says in this statement is essentially correct, with only a few minor things wrong.     So I will move on to the next one.

2. Less gender binaries means more fun for everyone! In a culture riddled with extreme gender binaries, women can’t play sports or even laugh too loud and men can’t cuddle babies or cute, tiny animals. That is one heck of a boring existence. As society widens the definition of “manhood” and “womanhood,” more individuals are free to participate in activities that are typically gendered and restricted to only one group or the other. That means a man can feel equally comfortable baking a cake (a traditionally “feminine” role) as he would playing football and a woman can change a flat tire while wearing high heels. The dedication of past feminists has already helped shape our current society, where “Cake Boss,” a man who loves to bake cakes, is a celebrity and Danica Patrick, the first woman to win the NASCAR Sprint Cup, participates in a long-time male-dominated sport.

Okay women have always been able to play sports.  The idea that they couldn’t is moronic.  However, she is confusing (like most feminists),  the idea of not being allowed to play sports with compete with men in sports.      The reason we have men’s leagues and women’s leagues in sports is due to fact women cannot compete with men in physical sports like football, basketball, hockey, baseball, boxing, etc.    All these sports require a level of fitness that if they compete with men, they will lose.  Every single time.   Women are just built differently than men and they need to accept that.

The next part of the statement that “men should feel comfortable baking a cake” –  Men in general throughout history have been the cooks, chefs and bakers.    Traditionally they have even taken turns cooking in the home as well.    As for the flat tire comment, most women are not interested in car maintenance and would rather pay someone else to change their tire or oil.   All you have to do is look at shop classes in high schools and count the girls in the classes.   Generally men are more interested in the dirty work than women are.

Cake Boss was not created by feminists.   That sentence is laughable on it’s face.   The guy became what he is today from  hard work, and learning from his FATHER how to bake cakes and run a business, and if you watch the show his sisters can’t decorate or bake worth a damn and that’s why they handle the customers.  That isn’t feminism, that is a family run business, and the jobs are dictated by skill not gender.

. Feminism gives little boys the chance to be children first, and boys second. Feminists know and understand that both boys and girls have every right to be angry, frustrated, happy and even sad or empathetic: In other words, human. However, emotions that are typically classified as “feminine,” like nurturing, caring, sympathetic or sadness, are usually disallowed from boyhood expression. Statements like “boys don’t cry” and “be a man” further reinforce the idea that men and boys cannot and should not exhibit basic emotions — a very debilitating and even immature concept. Boys and men are human, not robotic, emotionless androids. Feminism seeks to help society get over that fact.

Now here again is something that a feminist is taking credit for, when in reality, little boys have always been allowed to cry or be kids. And in fact when you look at who is the primary caregivers in any given household you will find it is the woman, and if she works, the daycare worker who is most likely going to be a woman.  And a study was done a few years back that found that a child will be hit by the female caregiver 900 times in a year.   Since we know that women have primary care on the first 4 years of that child, that means they are beating on average 3600 times the child.   And this happens when the child cries or gets angry or shows emotion.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1983895,00.html

“Boys don’t cry” is saying from slavery.   When male slaves were referred to as Boy and got a worst punishment if they cried.   Has nothing to do with gender.

“Be a man”  is a saying that means “Be responsible”   It comes from the time, when men were 100% responsible financially responsible for their family.   So if their child broke a window playing ball, the father had to be a man and pay for that window.

The first term was from racism, and the second wasn’t derogatory.   While the first one did indeed restrict public emotions, the second doesn’t.  Society doesn’t need feminism to get over showing emotions.  In fact I know many men who do and feminists laugh and berate them and even hit them when they do.   See next image for example of a feminist who likes men showing emotion:

Funny-memes-male-tears-mug

4. Feminism has given men the freedom to be fathers. In the past, many children longed for a male figure in the house, but men were frequently absent because of their role as the breadwinner. With women confined to the domestic space — along with the children — and men locked outside in the working world, it was very difficult for strong bonds to be built between child and father.

Now, many working women are capable of supporting a household or are at least able to contribute financially, allowing men to spend more time with their children and less time working. Crucial bonds that have long been absent from Western culture are being forged between father and child in a modern, post-feminist society.

This statement is an outright lie and I call Bullshit on this.   Men have always been fathers to their children and feminism never gave men this.   In fact in poor households, with the men working as well as the women the kids had equal time with both parents.  As a family.

In today’s society, with the high divorce rates, women are being awarded custody of the children in the majority of divorces.  Many of those men only get to see their children one weekend a month (if they are lucky) and rotating holidays.    And that is with joint custody.  That doesn’t allow much time for fathers to be with their children, or be fathers.    Feminism did this.  Not only that but the women demand support payments and alimony from the ex husband and the home and the car and usually gets those as well in most divorces.  This forces the man to pay for the wife, children and to pay HER Bills while allowing her to keep her money and spend it as she wishes without the responsibility of spending that on her children.

This is one of the main causes why men end up in jail, because in a marriage if a person’s financial situation changes the house finances are adjusted to suit that change.  After a divorce settlement, if a man loses his job he is still expected to pay these costs or end up in jail.   This is another reason why we are seeing more men homeless and broke.  And as well others fleeing the country to avoid the prohibitive costs set by the courts, on behest of the woman.

In the rare cases where the father gets custody, the women at most is expected to pay a small amount in support and very rarely alimony to support the husband, simply because men are usually the bigger bread winners and it’s rare to find a woman who makes more money in her chosen field.

And not only that but women will get paid by the state, if she is a single mother and no father listed on the birth certificate.  In other words the mother has no idea who the father is so the state becomes the father.   As long as she has that kid, then the government will pay her for it.   Now granted a man will get that same treatment if they have custody and the mother isn’t in the picture but that is extremely rare.

5. Feminism helps to make straight sex better and healthier. The impact of societal policing of female sexuality affects everyone, including the men who women are sleeping with. Many women must deal with debilitating feelings of guilt, shame and anxiety induced by patriarchy’s constant need to dominate and diminish female minds and bodies, which ultimately has negative effects on their sexual self-esteem. Feminism has fought to create safe spaces where women can engage in discourse about sex and their personal experiences. This not only helps women to better understand their minds and bodies, but it also enables the exploration of sexual desire and gives them the confidence to speak openly to their partners. Better communication and understanding is helpful in all relationships, especially sexual ones.

This is rich.  We are a dimorphic species.   That means there are inherent, instinctual things that males and females do differently.  This has to do with our evolution of our genders.    In order to ensure men’s genetics were passed on, the males would attempt to impregnate as many females as possible.   The more females, the more virile the man appears and the more attractive the male was to females.   Women however, evolved slightly different.   Due to the chance of death in childbirth and complications during pregnancy, women had to be more careful on choosing a mate.

This is why men to this day seem to be more like sexual beings who are out to sleep with as many women as possible, while women feel guilt over sleeping with many men.    This is a type of built in evolutionary trait that is built within each gender.

As for the safe spaces comment .. I say FUCK YOU FEMINISM.   Men are not allowed to have men only safe spaces.   You protest and screech at the mention of men only places.    So BULLSHIT on that statement.   As for confidence in speaking to their spouses.  If you lack the confidence, then maybe you need  get some mental health professional to help you with that.  Confidence comes from within and is not a gender trait in any way shape or form.   That is a trait that is learned.  If all your hearing is men are rapists, men are violent and men are evil, then yes, women will have confidence issues when speaking with men, including any boyfriends or husbands.  That is the fault of FEMINISM, not men.

7. Feminism helps society care about things that affect the women men care about. Birth control, women’s reproductive health, the right to vote, access to education and employment are just some of the issues feminism has tackled. Feminists have also worked to protect women and girls from domestic violence, sexual harassment and sexual assault. Without the movement, the women who men love — daughters, mothers, sisters, friends, girlfriends, wives — would be voiceless and without legal or social protection.

No one has ever said men didn’t care about women or women’s issues.   Which is why your movement had garnered such huge support.   However, I notice you don’t include abuse shelters for abused men, or right to fatherhood for men, or sexual harassment against men, or sexual assault against men in your statement.   You know, the problems that have gotten progressively worse since feminists have gotten their way?   And women, have never been voiceless.  They have ALWAYS had support in law against the crimes you list.   Women however, get away with these crimes more than men and men suffer as a result, which helps contribute to the suicide rates and homelessness of men.

8. Improvement for women and girls equals improvement for everyone. Multiple studies on the socioeconomic impact of education on society have found that increases in female education attainment leads to higher levels of both economic and social development. Countries that focus on educating women and girls tend experience decreased infertility and infant mortality rates and increased GDPs. As best said by the World Bank’s lead education economist, Harry Patrinos, “the profitability of education, according to estimates of private rate of return, is indisputable, universal and global.” A study done by Cynthia Lloyd and Margaret Greene, (Girls Count: A Global Investment and Action Agenda) with just one extra year of education to women and girls, their wages increased from 10-20 percent. These improvements benefit not only females, but also their families and society as a whole since money is typically reinvested (in the form of purchases) into the community.

Citation needed.     No actually statistics show that women are becoming more violent and men are opting out of marriage more.  Education is geared to get women into university into stem fields but women are not CHOOSING those fields.  Instead they choose courses that are easier and help them get careers in jobs that allow them the flexibility of scheduling and safety, over those that men get into which take them away from family more and are more dangerous to make more money.

In fact, less men are able to attend university due the fact they get no financial incentives or free rides.  Women get grants, loans and many other incentives to get into college and university.   That isn’t improvement.  It is oppression.

In closing I’m going to say this. Feminists are fucking idiots, with no concept that they are harming men, and women with their viewpoints and beliefs.   In no way shape or form is the oppression of men’s rights equality.