Gender Fluid theory is Garbage.

GF

To many people, they believe that gender fluid means that you can change your gender, like you can change your underwear.  The reality (truth) is that you can’t.    Gender is the description word we use to describe the sex of a person via pronouns.   “He” is the gender pronoun for a male.  “She” is the gender pronoun for a female.

The gender fluid idea not only dictates that you change your gender like you change your underwear, but that there must be a new gender pronouns created to describe these people.

Gender neutral pronouns have been created so people won’t offend their special snowflake friends.

Here is an example of made up, and in some cases unpronounceable pronouns:

Gender Pronouns.png

More of the garbage can be found here: http://uwm.edu/lgbtrc/support/gender-pronouns/

The problem with all this is simply the fact that people actually think, that changing your gender is the simply act of a way of thought or clothing.     The act of putting on a dress for a guy or bandaging up the breasts for a woman and putting on the opposite gender’s clothing means that they are the opposite sex.    It is not.   This is typically known as cross-dressing.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cross%E2%80%93dressing

I’ve heard the idea from the idiots who believe this nonsense that gender is based on your personality, and not your anatomy.    This is also untrue, since your anatomy dictates if your male or female.  Hence, why people say “Penis = Male” and “Vagina = Female”.

There are mentally ill people who think they are puppy dogs to and want to live out their lives as dogs or even other animals or even mythical creatures.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/may/25/secret-life-of-the-human-pups-the-men-who-live-as-dogs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3524063/Transgender-woman-Eva-Tiamat-Medusa-ears-nose-removed-dragon-lady.html

That brings me to trans-gendered people.   These people fall into the same category as the above.

These people suffer from a mental illness called “Gender Dysphoria”

These are people who are unhappy with their biological sex and believe they are the opposite sex.   That somehow, the doctor when they were born, didn’t recognize the proper gender and “assigned” them the wrong one.

Decades ago this was treated, successfully I might add, as a mental illness.  The treatment used to entail regular visits to a psychiatrist and medication.   It was believed that people who suffered from this illness had a chemical imbalance.    Then came the gay rights movement and feminism.      They cited that it was NOT a mental illness that gender is a social construct.    They convinced enough people, to re-examine the idea of the treatments, saying they are more harmful than helpful because it ignores the person’s feelings.     Remember folks, feeling over fact and science is precedence with these people.

Then doctors created the mutilation surgeries that are still to this day, really bad.  They allow people to voluntarily mutilate their bodies via cosmetic surgery in an effort to look like the opposite sex, while not being able to be biologically the opposite sex.

Let me explain.

You cannot change your DNA.   You cannot change your muscle structure.  You cannot change your skeletal structure.      So your body regardless of the surgery will still show up as your sex that you were born as.       This makes all those transgender surgeries under the category of cosmetic.

The worse part of it is that they are chopping off working body parts, and sewing on body parts that do not work as intended.   For example, a male undergoing a male to female surgery, will not have a working uterus, and no eggs.    So after the surgery she cannot bear children.    A female to male is worse.   In many cases the female decides to KEEP her uterus and have a penis sewn on.  Only the penis cannot produce sperm and needs a rod or a pump installed to inflate it to be able to have sex.   So technically it doesn’t work as functioning male either.   In many of the cases of the women who go through those surgeries and keep their uterus, they decide at some point to have a baby.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2416088/Transgender-German-man-Europe-baby-boy-following-home-birth.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=5302756&page=1

Transgender means that you are transitioning from one gender to another.  It doesn’t mean you can stay in that middle state and call yourself a man if you have a uterus.
Then the argument comes in that “Oh but the surgeries are expensive”.    Yes, well cosmetic surgeries usually are, because they do not add any value to health.  And are why they call them cosmetic.

And these people still are not happy after they go through with the surgeries.   In fact many regret doing it.  So much that they commit suicide in the same high numbers as they do before the surgeries.

http://www.sexchangeregret.com/

When you fight your own biology, you will lose.  You can’t change your gender.  It is scientifically an impossibility.    Feminist theory professors have an agenda.  Indoctrination into the cult of feminism.  They need to convince young minds that their theories are facts and due to the borg collective mentally of feminism,  many just believe this without question.

Don’t fall for the idea that Gender is fluid on anyone’s say so.  Challenge it.  Question it.   Dissect it.

Advertisements

Free Speech vs Hate Speech

I recently got into a debate on this (again), and for some reason people cannot fathom that hate speech laws are a form of censorship.     Worse yet.   We have the mayor of Ottawa Jim Watson, who has been in his office since the beginning of time, who openly now tweets and states that he is for the stiffing of speech because he finds it “vile”.

Mayors blast ‘pro-rape’ men’s meetings planned for Canadian cities

I tweeted him and stated that wanting to censor free speech is wrong, and he responded by calling me vile for supporting the guy  who wants to open a dialog about the rape laws.

Reasonable people understand that rape is bad.  We all know this.  No one condones rape.   The problem lies with the idea and definitions of rape.

Feminist supporters think rape can be this magical thing that can happen at any point.     Let me explain.

They (Liberals and Feminists) believe that (I’ve written about this before),

  1.  A man and a woman who BOTH get drunk, BOTH consent to sex and have sexual intercourse is rape.    Why?  A woman is apparently unable to consent while drunk.
  2. A woman who goes home with a strange man, gets drunk, takes drugs and gets naked, has sex with the strange man but doesn’t remember having sex has been raped.
  3. A woman who consents to having sex even when sober and then regrets the experience a week later, has been apparently been raped.

Do you notice the trend here?     Women are not responsible for their actions but men are despite being equal in things.

So this Return of Kings guy is calling for a debate and discussion about the rape laws if it occurs in your own home.

I get what he is saying and while I don’t agree entirely, with much of what he says, I understand that freedom of speech means being able to talk about things that people may find vile or abhorrent without repercussions from government.

As far as Mayor Jim Watson is concerned the idea of questioning the idea of rape laws is abhorrent.    This is the type of people in power and have been in power for a very long time.

I tweeted back the mayor stating the differences, that hate is the calling for 90% of men to be castrated or killed via the #killallmen hashtag.   Or the Drinking Male Tears meme which is common among rich white sorority girl feminists who do not understand basic concepts of freedom of speech.

Using these laws to shut down talk and discussion that you “FEEL” is wrong is not a valid reason.   Free Speech is a double edged sword.    I’m gay and I’ve heard the debate and discussion when gay marriage and even back when gays were not accepted as they are now.    I may not have liked what was being said but I never wanted to stop people from speaking their minds on subjects and having rational discussions.

Jim Watson, Justin Trudeau, if a woman or a man goes home with a stranger, and has spent a night flirting and implying they are interested in having sexual intercourse, and they go to either one’s home, get drunk or even not.    Get naked and have sex, and one party regrets it the next day, that is not rape.     Neither is it when you get drunk, and get naked in someone else’s bed.   That is called implied consent.   I know this concept is foreign to you but it is a real thing.    Penalizing someone for wanting to speak their mind on the subject or banning someone from speaking is called censorship.

And censorship is a form of oppression and hate.    Hate of true freedom.

Dear World, Justin Trudeau doesn’t represent Canada.

Dear World Population,

First I would like to thank you for reading my open letter.   I know that you are busy, so I will try to keep this short.

Justin Trudeau does not represent Canada.     Yes I know, he is the PM of the crown corporation of Canada, and claims he is the representative.    However, I will state this.   He does not represent the values, nor the ideals of the majority of Canadians.

How can he be the PM then you ask?    Good question.   First, and foremost, the majority didn’t vote for him.   Believe it!

The problem with our voting system is our leaders are chosen years in advance.   The media manipulates their audience with back and forth promotions to make it seem like it is a fair and honest election.     As I have written in the past about elections  and the process I won’t get into here, except that our votes don’t matter and that we do not live in a democracy.    If we did the people’ who removed their votes would be counted.   In this country though, the people who don’t vote are left behind.     In reality only a very small percentage of the Canadian population actually voted in the last election and of them an even smaller number voted liberal.

You see in our country, we are forced to vote for a party, not an individual.   So if you like the candidates objectives in your riding and vote for them then the party gets the seats in parliament.   This means that the person who is head of that party gets to be PM of the country.      If you don’t like the leader of the party but feel the only there is one candidate who falls in with your values or ideas of how the country should be run but hate the leader of that party, you really only have 2 choices.  Vote anyway or not vote at all.    Last election, the major portion of the population didn’t vote.

Now I know what your thinking.   “Then vote and make a difference”.   It doesn’t matter.   After speaking with Elections Canada, they informed me that even if only 10 people in the whole country voted then then we would still have a PM and the government would still run.

That is NOT a democracy.

So again, Justin Trudeau does not represent Canadians or our values.    His mindset is of third wave feminism which is about elevating women, giving them things like money, jobs, opportunities simply based on their gender instead of actually earning those things.

Recently he called for all Canadian’s to “embrace feminism and not be scared of it”.     This caused an uproar in the comment section of every media source that printed an article about this.

Canadians’ do not like third wave feminism.    Canadians believe in real equality, not the brand of equality that takes from men who have earned their money, job etc, and giving to to women simply because they are women.        This brand of feminism goes against the original brand of feminism that was about women having the right to work along side men and earn the same money and the same promotions as men.    Not be handed those positions, without earning or working for it, simply based on the the anatomy.

The original feminists who fought back in the 60’s speak out against this current crop of so called feminism.

In this country we believe in fair treatment.   We believe if you work hard in your career, and put in the time, sweat and tears into your job then you deserve and should move up the ladder.    You don’t get handed the board of directors position simply because you have a degree in gender studies.

To listen to our PM and see his efforts on behalf of feminism you would think we are all feminists, and we are definitely not.     It’s time to call out third wave feminism by all.  Time to call out the PM for pandering only to an ideal that puts men less than women instead of on equal footing.    It’s time to shout down this nonsense from all sources, and stop this before it really becomes harmful on our society.

Canada used to be peacekeepers, and the majority of us still believe we can be this again.
Canada used to be accepting of other cultures and groups.    We believe we can be this again.

Canada used to accept all religions and faiths and we believe we can be this again.

Don’t let Justin Trudeau’s  face fool you.    He is on a leash being controlled by third wave feminism, and he doesn’t speak for us.

And Justin, if you are reading this, understand this, you are a tool for the feminists.   You are not a feminist.   They will throw you under the bus the minute you are no longer a use to  them.    A man cannot be a feminist, that is like a black person supporting the slavery of black people.    Stop pandering to them and start representing Canada.  The real Canada.    Otherwise you may lose your job.

Calling all so called victims – Your actions have repercussions.

HELL

One thing I hear about each day, is case after case of men who have been accused of rape or sexual assault in the papers.    I barely read those articles anymore, simply due to the fact, they are all the same.   The person accused had plied the poor victim with booze or drugs, or had met the poor victim at a party, got drunk together, and then the poor victim went home with the accused and then well, rape.

If you have been a victim of rape, it can be traumatic.   We all understand this.   I have had two attempts of rape happen to me.

Being a victim doesn’t mean you are blameless.   It means something bad has happened to you.   It doesn’t mean you are not responsible, nor does it mean you are one hundred percent blameless.

I’ll use the current Cosby case as an example.   Here is a woman who admitted under oath, that she went over to Cosby’s Hotel Room. of her own free will.   He offered her drinks and she accepted willingly.   He offered her drugs.   She took voluntarily.

I’m stopping there.

This is why I don’t think is much of a victim.  Well, sorry, rather she is a victim of her own actions.    She accepted the booze, and drugs of her own free will.  He didn’t force her to drink and do the drugs.  He didn’t hold a gun to her head.

Does this excuse Cosby if he did it?    No it doesn’t, but it does give a clear idea of what the situation was at that meeting.   And shows the woman was using poor judgement, and was at least a victim of her own stupidity.

Now I’ll give more detail to my two experiences.
I’ll start off by stating (I’ve mentioned in other blogs), that I’m gay.   In my younger days I used to go to bathhouses.   These were and are places were gay men of all ages go to have sex.   They had reached their height in the Nineties when gays were not yet accepted and there was still a danger to go to a gay bar.   It was also a great place for those who were still in the closet to go and have sex.

Now on this night, I had been out drinking at a dance club.  I had gone to the bathhouse (because I didn’t find anyone at the bar to go home with), and got a room.    In bathhouses when you rent a room it’s this tiny room with this cheaply made bed in it, with a vinyl covered mattress and thin cotton sheet.    Everyone who goes to a bathhouse, can either rent a locker or a room, and you are given a towel to wear and that’s it.    Basically your naked in a towel and wander around until you find someone you want to have sex with.    Or, like me you can rent a room and wait for the guy to come to you.     This doesn’t mean you can’t be choosy.   In fact many people who go to these places are.   We all have our types.

Anyway, I was laying on the bed with the towel barely covering me, when this really, really drunk guy showed up at my open door.  I got a bad feeling so I told him no thank you, but I wasn’t interested (this is the politest way there to let the person know to go away).    The guy however, had different ideas and came in and shut the door.   He proceeded to try to throw my legs above his shoulders and penetrate me.    I used both feet on his chest and threw him off, which he flew backwards into the wall.   That wasn’t enough and he again tried.     And again I threw him off.   Banging his head hard on the wall.   After a third try he left my room.

I didn’t call the police and even though I was a victim of an attempted rape, it was still my fault.   I knew this at the time and to this day I don’t blame that guy.   I put myself in that position and I knowingly ran that risk.   This is the risk you take when you go and and sexually tease strangers.  It’s not pretty but it’s true.  When you sexually tease people, you run the risk of pushing the wrong button on someone that will set them off.

The second time, that I consider attempted rape, was when I lived in BC.  I lived in this gay hotel and was in the lounge drinking and chatting with the cute bartender.   I was happily drinking and at the end of his shift he offered to take me to his room.    I drunkenly agreed.   We got up to his room and I promptly passed out.  With my jeans and underwear on.    The next thing I remember was waking up and I was naked with him inside me.  I had no recollection of even going up to his room or half the night at the bar.  So I freaked out.   Pushed him off em and accused him angrily of raping me.     He was horrified.   He apologized profusely and even sent me flowers the next day.    I realized after that he wasn’t at fault.  I was.  I had accepted his offer to go to his room and that was implied consent.   I was the one who made the mistake of 1.  Accepting free drinks from him, 2.  Going up to his room in that state.   So I in no way put the full blame on him.

Now fast forward to today and you get you Social Justice Warriors who think that a victim has zero responsibility in their actions and I am telling you that you are full of it.     You are not blameless.     What you wear is important, your actions before hand are important and how you interact with a person are important.    If you tease and tease someone, and then say “No no, no!” you are risking pushing that button on that person who is not mentally stable.     If you accept drinks from strange men and then go home with them, expect they want to have sexual intercourse with you.

If you accept drinks from strangers, if you go home with strangers, then you run the risk of rape or sexual assault.    There is a good chance you will be going home with someone decent.   Don’t get me wrong there, but if you’re going home with a new guy every week or every few days, then the odds are pretty good that you will end up being a statistic.

Now, here is the advice.     You are in control of your life.  That means you have to accept responsibility for your actions, and as such, take precautions.   Learn self-defense, carry pepper spray.   Make sure a friend knows where you are going etc.

This is not taking any responsibility of a crime off the criminal.  What this does is help stop you from becoming a victim and the crime from happening in the first place.

It’s like a car.  You don’t go parking your car in a crime riddled neighborhood and leave the doors wide open and the keys in the ignition.  If you did that and your car gets stolen, were you asking for it?   Yes.  The person who stole the car is still a criminal but you can bet your sweet ass you asked for it, by doing that.

Same with going home with strange men, teasing them, and then denying them sex.    Most men will put up with that and respect your choice, but go through enough men and the odds are you will find one who won’t respect your saying No No.

I really hope this gets passed on and the message gets through to at least some people who believe that no victim is at fault for their actions because as I have just shown, that isn’t correct.

Feminist Myth’s – Check your male privilege at the door. The lies Feminists tell Society.

male-privilege-female-oppression

I’ve been watching videos on you tube about men’s rights advocates and activists forming men’s support groups for men’s issues over the past few weeks.   After doing reading and investigating this I’ve come to realize that we have been lied to.

We have been lied to by the feminists for generations.   We have allowed the integration of feminist dogma to influence law and allowed them to teach new generations their ideals in schools.

I’m not against any ideas that are logical and make sense.    I’m really not, but I never really look closely at feminist logic or ideas that closely until recently.   After all, I grew up being told that women are strong and are equal to men and that rape is rape and should never be accepted.

Any logical, thinking human being can agree to the above paragraph.   It’s not until you delve into the myths deeper that you can see the flaws, and I do called a myths because it turns out, that all their assertions about men are completely false.

Let’s look at the rape statistic every feminist pulls out on universities and colleges for students.   The dogma we hear everywhere and I do mean everywhere.  In the news, print, radio, even tv shows, we hear that One in Four women will be raped in the course of their college career.    This is scary and instills fear into women, along with anger.   This statistic is completely false and should be looked at with reason.    By looking at the statistics from the places that have colleges or universities, the statistics actually show a different story.   Turns out the real figure is One in almost Thirteen Hundred.  (1 in 1300).  And depending on the area that ratio is smaller 1 in 5000.   That means rape is actually rare.   So the assertion of 1 in 4 or 5 is complete and utter nonsense.

So where did that stat come from?   It came from a badly written piece of drivel by a man hating feminist in the 70s who stated in her book that she wanted all but ten percent of men dead (10 percent for breeding stock).    In her book she stated that 1 in 4 men would rape a woman on a college campus.   No source for that stat was ever cited in that book and has been disproved by rational people over and over and over again.

Another assertion these feminists make is that women are the victims of abuse at the hands of men.   That men are violent and cause most of the violence in domestic partnerships.

I used to believe that one as well, until I looked at numbers and dug deeper.    The ratio of domestic violence is about 50/50.  Men are abused by women just as much as women are.   There is a skewed outlook here on this and women use this to their advantage that many feminists will claim they don’t.

If a man beats a woman, he is automatically thrown in cuffs and taken to jail.  The woman will get support via many publicly funded means.   Support groups, mental health professionals, and even battered women’s shelters.

If a woman beats a man, he is thrown in cuffs and taken to jail, and has to prove he is not at fault.    Usually, the woman is in tears when the police arrive and are trained to automatically assume the man is guilty.    In the rare cases where the woman is arrested, she is more likely to either be put in the drunk tank for the night and let go in the morning with no charges or if charges are laid, gets an extremely light sentence like probation.

I experienced this years ago before I became a legal adult.   So fortunately I was protected by my youth and the fact the woman in question’s testimony was an outright lie.

Here is what happened.   I had asked to borrow money because I need to pay someone back and I hadn’t been paid at my new job.  So, when I asked my “friend’ she went into a rage.  And I mean, she was nice as pie one second and then red faced and screaming at me the next.   I tried to get away from this after taking her rage calmly for 10 minutes or so.   I walked away.  Unfortunately, we lived in an apartment complex (her being in another unit on a different floor) and when I went to the elevator she followed.   All the while screaming and yelling at the top of her lungs.    Berating me, calling me derogatory names and spitting.     Then, because i didn’t react to her behavior, she hit me in the face.     Now I have been taught not to hit women, but something triggered and I slapped her back.  Open handed, and not as hard as she hit me.  It was enough that it snapped her out of her rage and she stopped and went back to her unit.

Now many “Feminists” would look at that and say I was in the wrong that I shouldn’t have hit her etc etc.    That “snap” in me was my instinct for self preservation, and I had felt trapped by her and when she attacked, I instinctively slapped back in defense.   It stopped the attack and I managed to get away.

Feminism would have you believe that I was the aggressor in that situation.   That she was defending herself with the first slap in preparation of being attacked by me a man.   So in their logic, I’m at fault and the woman is the victim and shouldn’t have any responsibility or blame.

The absurdly in that feminist logic defies laughter.  It is so harmful, but it permeates society so ingrained that people don’t even see the illogic to it.

To make matters worse in that situation, after she left and I got away from her rage, she called the police.   She told them, that I had come to her for money (True) and that when she refused to give it to me (Lie), that I had beat her closed fisted.(Lie)  She said in her police statement that she dropped to the ground to protect herself from my fists beating her (Lie) and that I continued to beat her for a few minutes (lie) and then fled the scene.   Leaving her to call the police.

The absurdity in her statement is apparent when compared with my version of the story.  However, if you take the two accounts and compare, most would still take the woman’s side.  After all I’m a man.   However, there is a slight problem of evidence is which is why the charged were dismissed.    You see, at the time I was 5ft 10, and weighed approximately 175lbs.   She was approximately 5ft tall and weighed approximately 110lbs wet.

When the police came to the call they made note that she was not injured and didn’t have single mark on her and refused to go to the hospital and even told police that she had no injuries.   Yet in her statement, she claimed I had beat her to the ground.

Logic says that if I did that there would be injury to her in some way, even from dropping to the ground.  She would have had bruising and and marks from the so called beating.    There wasn’t and so when it came before a judge, the lawyers felt bad for me and didn’t want my life ruined so they “forgot” to tell her about the trial date and time and when she didn’t show my case was dismissed and the record was wiped clean (I was a minor at the time, she was an adult).

If it wasn’t for the compassion of the prosecution lawyer and mine at the time, I’m sure I would have been found guilty.  Simply because she called the police first and because the woman’s word is always favored before a man’s in court.    And technically under law at the time I did commit assault.  So the only way to get me out of that bind was for the legal teams on both sides to do something tricky and not tell her the real trial date and time.

That was my personal experience when I was 17 years old, and even though I experienced it firsthand the violence and lies of a feminist woman, I still believed the dogma and lies they perpetuated.

Another lie they represent is that women are strong but yet are all victims.   In truth this is an excuse to get their own way.  If they don’t you as a man are oppressing them and so they are the victim.

When it comes to earning money, they claim there is a wage gap.  This is a huge lie and one of the biggest.  In Ontario, the government spent a huge amount (approx a billion dollars), to create a measure to test business and industry to find the areas were women are paid less and to create laws that force employers to pay women the same as men.

What they found was that there was no wage gap.  One business, had a 3 cent wage gap.  That was all. That was the only gap they found and the employer corrected the gap and when the women were asked if they noticed a difference the answer was no.

The truth is different when you look at the stats.  Women are more inclined to choose different professions than men.  Those “male dominated” workplaces are a half truth.  There are fields that are dominated by women as well.
In the stats, it shows that the women will chose fields that give them flexibility in scheduling over money.   While men will choose fields that pay them more but are more dangerous and require long hours or being away from family.

These stats make more sense when you see the stats for men concerning work place injury etc.  When it comes to injuries at work, roughly only 2% are women and the rest are men.   Such a huge gap!   This matches with the stats.
Feminists will ignore this.

The whole idea we have to take women at their word is the core of the feminist dogma.  They expect and train us men to believe this from birth.   If you don’t believe this is true, then just use logic.

Women are the primary care givers of children.   Even in today’s society.    Women are the ones who in our formative years will teach us not to hit girls, to respect girls and even protect girls.    We grow up and because it was taught to us, and reinforced over and over, it becomes part of us.

We go into adult hood believing this with the idea that women are strong and independent, but conflicts with us because we have been also been taught they are victims and we should protect them.    Little girls are taught the same thing but are also taught it’s okay to hit boys simply because they see women and other little girls getting away without penalty when they hit a boy.
So really in truth, the feminists who decry the men’s issues groups as hate groups are just running on illogic and lies.  They have no concept of the harm they are doing to society and men have just as much right to form groups for support and discuss men’s issues as women do.

Some of the issues are
Abuse of men by their partners (men and women)

Issues regarding homelessness (majority of men comprise the homeless, and that inclused gay teens)

The high rate of suicide in men.

Legal issues facing men.

Oppression of men throughout society.

And if you scoff at the last one then you really don’t understand what men go through.  Men are definitely not privileged. We don’t get special laws to protect us, we don’t get special treatment because of our body parts.

Years ago I tried to get a loan or a grant through the government to start my own business.   At the time before  they cut all of them out there was all sorts for people to get.   However,  I noticed one thing.   As a male I was not eligible for any of them.

There was grants and loans for LGBT, People of different races, women,   However, if you were a white male you couldn’t get a grant or loan from the government to start your small business.  I could have gotten one under the LGBT grant but that required the business to benefit the gay community solely and be non profit so I wasn’t eligible for that really since I wanted to open a coffee shop.

So my “male” privilege didn’t help me there either.   All my life I’ve had to work hard for what I have.  No one gave it to me, I earned it.  I’m not privileged in any way by my gender.  The opposite is true.  I constantly hear everywhere that I am bad, and violent due to my gender and because of that I’m the cause of every problem in the world.   We as men of all races are rapists, murderers, thieves and deadbeats.     Any male that tells you they aren’t feeling oppressed with this kind of society is mentally flawed and indoctrinated into this feminist myth and lies.

I laugh when I see on these videos of conferences when males stand up and proudly announce that they are a feminist and are leaving their privilege at the door.   Inwardly I weep, because they are just so indoctrinated, that they proudly proclaim that they are less then equal to women and that women are more.    I watch their faces and listen to the tone of their voices and many actually sound scared and look around to make sure the nearest feminists smile and approves of their statement. When they do the male then relaxes and continues to speak.   You hear it with the statement of “I’m so and so and I’m a feminist, and I am checking my privilege”.   Or something like that.  Every video I watched of these kids has them justifying their right to speak with that sentence.     None of them just say I’m so and so and here is my question.  Nope.  They always have to apologize for being male.

And that is not equality.  That is oppression of men.