Gender Fluid theory is Garbage.


To many people, they believe that gender fluid means that you can change your gender, like you can change your underwear.  The reality (truth) is that you can’t.    Gender is the description word we use to describe the sex of a person via pronouns.   “He” is the gender pronoun for a male.  “She” is the gender pronoun for a female.

The gender fluid idea not only dictates that you change your gender like you change your underwear, but that there must be a new gender pronouns created to describe these people.

Gender neutral pronouns have been created so people won’t offend their special snowflake friends.

Here is an example of made up, and in some cases unpronounceable pronouns:

Gender Pronouns.png

More of the garbage can be found here:

The problem with all this is simply the fact that people actually think, that changing your gender is the simply act of a way of thought or clothing.     The act of putting on a dress for a guy or bandaging up the breasts for a woman and putting on the opposite gender’s clothing means that they are the opposite sex.    It is not.   This is typically known as cross-dressing.

I’ve heard the idea from the idiots who believe this nonsense that gender is based on your personality, and not your anatomy.    This is also untrue, since your anatomy dictates if your male or female.  Hence, why people say “Penis = Male” and “Vagina = Female”.

There are mentally ill people who think they are puppy dogs to and want to live out their lives as dogs or even other animals or even mythical creatures.

That brings me to trans-gendered people.   These people fall into the same category as the above.

These people suffer from a mental illness called “Gender Dysphoria”

These are people who are unhappy with their biological sex and believe they are the opposite sex.   That somehow, the doctor when they were born, didn’t recognize the proper gender and “assigned” them the wrong one.

Decades ago this was treated, successfully I might add, as a mental illness.  The treatment used to entail regular visits to a psychiatrist and medication.   It was believed that people who suffered from this illness had a chemical imbalance.    Then came the gay rights movement and feminism.      They cited that it was NOT a mental illness that gender is a social construct.    They convinced enough people, to re-examine the idea of the treatments, saying they are more harmful than helpful because it ignores the person’s feelings.     Remember folks, feeling over fact and science is precedence with these people.

Then doctors created the mutilation surgeries that are still to this day, really bad.  They allow people to voluntarily mutilate their bodies via cosmetic surgery in an effort to look like the opposite sex, while not being able to be biologically the opposite sex.

Let me explain.

You cannot change your DNA.   You cannot change your muscle structure.  You cannot change your skeletal structure.      So your body regardless of the surgery will still show up as your sex that you were born as.       This makes all those transgender surgeries under the category of cosmetic.

The worse part of it is that they are chopping off working body parts, and sewing on body parts that do not work as intended.   For example, a male undergoing a male to female surgery, will not have a working uterus, and no eggs.    So after the surgery she cannot bear children.    A female to male is worse.   In many cases the female decides to KEEP her uterus and have a penis sewn on.  Only the penis cannot produce sperm and needs a rod or a pump installed to inflate it to be able to have sex.   So technically it doesn’t work as functioning male either.   In many of the cases of the women who go through those surgeries and keep their uterus, they decide at some point to have a baby.

Transgender means that you are transitioning from one gender to another.  It doesn’t mean you can stay in that middle state and call yourself a man if you have a uterus.
Then the argument comes in that “Oh but the surgeries are expensive”.    Yes, well cosmetic surgeries usually are, because they do not add any value to health.  And are why they call them cosmetic.

And these people still are not happy after they go through with the surgeries.   In fact many regret doing it.  So much that they commit suicide in the same high numbers as they do before the surgeries.

When you fight your own biology, you will lose.  You can’t change your gender.  It is scientifically an impossibility.    Feminist theory professors have an agenda.  Indoctrination into the cult of feminism.  They need to convince young minds that their theories are facts and due to the borg collective mentally of feminism,  many just believe this without question.

Don’t fall for the idea that Gender is fluid on anyone’s say so.  Challenge it.  Question it.   Dissect it.

Vaccines, kill you later!


I’m so over the vaccine debate that to me it’s a done deal.  I’m against it.   Yet, daily I see posts from people who are for it and who are against it.    The reasons from the pro side just don’t add up, nor do they make any sense.

The latest diatribe I heard from the pro vaccine side is trying to discount the inserts as something not to worry about, or that people don’t understand how to read them properly etc.

No friends, the inserts are very clear.

Here is the MMR2 Insert in PDF.

Click to access mmr_ii_pi.pdf

Notice the six pages, (yes six) of adverse reactions, which include but are not limited to death and other various lifelong medical problems.

Notice the part where it says it is NOT 100% effective 100% of the time?    This means it doesn’t work.

Yet people still advocate for this poison and discount these warnings as nothing to be worried about, and at the same time make comments like “There is only a 15% chance of getting an adverse reaction, that means it’s still 85% safe”.    (They obviously didn’t read the NOT 100% safe part.)

Another nail in the coffin I found just today, was a paper that cites a 120 years worth of history of diseases and vaccines and their effects written by a doctor.

Here it is:

Now I read this and now know that there are many doctors and medical professionals who know this information.  They know it is harmful.  And in fact they discuss how the vaccinated population are at risk of death if even small pox breaks out.   Not the  people who decided not to vaccinate.  They discuss it clearly and explain why this is.

This is something I’ve known for years, but yet people have seem to have just forgotten.     Our immune systems are made so we can get sick and develop natural antibodies.     The vaccines don’t do this.     They never did.

Silly people cite that these diseases were wiped out by vaccines, but the truth is they weren’t.   They disappeared due to better hygiene, better sanitation and better food preparation.    Diseases come and go as well throughout history.  Some diseases have even been found in arctic ice samples.   (Think of the arctic ice melting now, scary huh).  The common denominator in diseases in hygiene, sanitation and food safety.   Your less likely to get sick if all three of those conditions are good.  Not any vaccine.

When these vaccines were introduced, the diseases were almost gone, not by any drugs but by better standards of living.

Now we have occasional outbreaks of measles, mumps etc.   And they have always been traced back to vaccinated people.  Always.    The media doesn’t report that very loudly though.  They don’t want to loose all that advertising revenue from the drug companies, but that still doesn’t change the fact that vaccinated people are more at risk from a disease than those that have not been vaccinated.

Our bodies get a disease by breathing in or eating some microbe or virus via mouth, nose or stomach.   It has to then get to our blood stream but it first gets analyzed  by our immune system and antibodies keyed to our body are created and when the virus hits our bloodstream, our immune response already has started to respond and attack it.   Then when the virus has been eradicated from our body the specific antibody’s dna or structure is stored in our dna so when or if we get infected again, our body can easily and quickly create new antibodies to attack the virus.

A vaccine does not do this.    The vaccine is injected into us bypassing the normal natural ways we contract a disease.   As well, depending on the vaccine, some vaccines have dead virus’ in them.   So the antibodies that are created from that dead virus have certain problems.    The first being that the antibodies are being created to combat something that is already dead.  The other issue the antibodies in the virus are not keyed to your body.  They weren’t created by your body so when they are cloned by your body they really aren’t beneficial to your body.    Imagine a clone of someone else.   Then cloning that clone a few million times, and then take an organ from the final clone like the liver and transplanting it in you.   The chances the organ won’t do anything are pretty high and most likely your health will be compromised.

This is what a vaccine is. Or does.   It leaves you compromised health wise.      It offers a false sense of protection from disease.     Which is better a lifelong immunity or something that is temporary, can possibly harm you for life and even kill you if you get sick.

No thank you.   I’ll not vaccinate and keep my health thank you.


The God Theory – It’s not exactly what everyone thinks.

I’m going to start by saying, that I am not religious.   I have always believed that organized religion is a way to control the masses and make money.  After all, the pope sits on a throne made of pure gold and has robes lined with threads of gold and wears a crown that is gold as well.

That being said, I’ve never fully disbelieved in spirituality.   Many cultures, if not all, believe in higher beings.   What I considered is one line, that most religious people state, and that is “We are made in his image”.     I always found that odd.  How can we be made in “god’s” image and yet no one knows what “he” looks like, and that made me think.  I thought about this for years off and on.   If god is so vast, how could we possibly understand such a being?    Then that led to my working out what I am about to tell you.    Please keep an open mind, as it may go against what you have been taught, or believed.   My theory is just a theory, unproven, and untested.    However, if it is true, then it is the tie that binds, and harmonize science, vs religion.

So here is my theory.

test molecule

We are all made in his image?   What is that image?  What does he look like?   What are the things in the universe that are common in everything.

The molecule.   Everything in the universe is made up of molecules.  Everything.  What if the molecule we know is just the smallest that we can see?    What if there are larger molecules, out there from our point of view?  What if that larger molecule was say, planet sized?

Imagine if you will, every planet in the universe, a molecule.  Each sun a neutron.  Giving life energy to those molecules.   We know from science that molecules die out, turn to “dust”.  Our bodies are made up of molecules.  What if the universe is “Him”.  Every part of the universe is part of him.  Including every being, every plant, every animal.

Think of space.   How vast and empty.   What if I  told you that was the space in between molecules?   Imagine if we are tiny, so tiny that a molecule looked as massive as a planet, the space in between molecules would be that vast.   So if that is the case then maybe, we are all god?

Molecules by themselves are not that great, one molecule for instance cannot form a table for instance.   A billion molecules together, however, do make a table.     We human beings work the same way.   One person, by himself cannot make an army, or build a skyscraper.   A million people however, can change things.  Build cities, accomplish so much.

When we destroy the object, we are not really destroying the molecules.  We are just changing the configuration.  Turning the object from one shape to a completely different shape.   The molecules are still there.

When a planet disintegrates, it’s molecules form dust.  That dust can sit in the vastness of space, until gravitational forces pull it together to form a new planet or turn it to something else.  Like a moon, or even into a new star.

If we are made up of molecules, and all those molecules, billions upon billions beyond counting, in infinite number, then is it not possible for those molecules in our bodies, are the same as the planets in the universe?

Some questions arise from this vastness, and I do not claim to have all the answers.   The molecule is the one thing that is literally universal, and it is the only thing can resolve the conflict between science and religion.

If we are created in god’s image, and everything in the universe is made up of molecules, then I propose that we are all god, and are all part of that vast being.   The universe would be that being.   Outer Space, being the space between the molecular structure of that infinite being.

This theory does also resolve the idea that yes indeed there are multiple universes.  If we have this universe, then why can’t there be others?

In life we know there has to be balance.  Otherwise, bad things can happen and living things can die.  Their molecules being returned to the planet, air, etc.   A plant for example when it dies, will change it’s molecular structure from green, and thriving, to dry, and turn to dust.     When a person dies, our body’s molecules change, until we are dust.  Even, our bone’s molecules change to dust.

Speaking of death of the body.    What happens to the neurons that fire in the brain when the body dies?    I’m not talking about the brain, but the energy?   What happens to it?   We know that our brains neurons fire a type of energy which causes our brain to run.  The spark of thought I call it.     What happens to it?

I theorize that the energy doesn’t just disappear.  It is released or dissipates and changes form, much like the molecules.  Energy never just goes away.  It can be changed from a powerful force to something that we can’t use.   Much like how the steam engine can change water to steam and use the steam to push a piston and then the steam that is released into the air cools and changes and helps the clouds form, and cause rain.

The universe is the same.   Our energy doesn’t just go away.  It changes.  It becomes an energy that is part of the planet.  Have you ever had a thought that was completely original, and then came across that same idea from someone on the other side of the planet?

(example of a mapped out Ley Lines of the planet)

Our “molecule” has a magnetic field, but there is another energy which permeates the planet and many cultures and people have even tried to give that life energy a name.  Ley Lines.  Some have tried to map them out, and I have no idea how accurate they are.  If true, this would be where the energy is released when the body dies.  It “returns to the earth” so to speak.   This would also explain why some people “hear” dead people, or feel uneasy at certain places, or have connections with people the first time they meet them.   Chances are they met them before.    It would explain much about reincarnation theory, and on the whole makes me think that is more than possible.   Even, the idea of a heaven, or hell.   Your thoughts are powerful, and full of energy, and when your brains energy releases, it joins with other energy and a “heaven” is created, out of thought alone and given life with energy of that thought changed form.

When two people have intercourse and the sperm, enters the egg, it causes cell division, and that energy is drawn from those lines from the planet.    That “spirit” is given to the new life forming.  That is how we are reborn, and why we sometimes have such strong connections to other people.  Chances are we did meet them, and fall in love, and have a life in some previous life.


I don’t expect anyone to believe me.  As I said at the beginning, this is a theory. My theory.   I do not have the skills to prove this.  That would be up to someone else to prove or disprove.   If correct it would solve so many of life’s questions and as well change how we would see life and death.    It would being science and spirituality together instead of at odds, and help us understand the universe a bit more.

It also does a few other things as well.  It eliminates the idea that the bible was written by “god” and the words inside it were a  primitive understanding of what is a bigger question but written by men.  Not by gods.

I sincerely hope you take something good from this.    If we are all created in his image then we need to understand ourselves and the universe we live in.  Otherwise we cannot even begin, to claim we know what he wants.