What exactly is Fake News? The Fake News War!

fake-news

Since before the american election last year, we have been hearing more and more about “fake news”, so much to the extent that the term has become part of the general vernacular of most people, and even those who don’t understand what the Fake News War is about, but will readily defend their favorite news agency.    So this is the break down on what exactly is fake news and why this is so important in the way it breaks down the public trust in the mainstream media outlets.

Lies by Omission.

Let’s face it all media outlets lie by omission, and there are some who at least try to be fully honest, however, there is some media outlets that stand out in doing this.  I will refer the most blatant one, the one that everyone loves to defend but has been proven time and time again to lie to the public.

What I mean by lies by omission is presenting the news but leaving out things to skew the perspective in favor of whatever agenda you wish to push.     For example, the election and Hilary Clinton.

CNN was blatant in this and to this day,  as I write this, they are still lying to the public about Trump.

Here is how they do it.

1.  Cherry picking.     They will present only certain parts of the story.   That can be video footage of a crying “victim” or  picking or choosing a specific sentence in a speech, which taken out of the context of the paragraph being said sounds damning.     CNN did this and still to this day does it.

I will use the famous “Grab her by the pussy” comment that they used from a 20 year old recording of Donald Trump that they recorded while he was chatting with a reporter off record during his Time on the apprentice and when he was funding the Miss America Pageant.

The context they conveniently left out when you hear the entire conversation was that he was talking about groupies.    Groupies are people who are  enamored with someone of celebrity status.   What Trump was discussing was how these people, in particular the women.  And as well when it came to that sentence in particular, he was talking about one experience in particular about his encounter with a groupie , who “WOULD have let him grab her by the pussy”, if he had wanted to.

This is a very big difference from the mainstream narrative of “Grab her by the pussy”.   This narrative makes it sound like he DID grab her by the pussy and he was bragging.   This lie by omission was done by remove key words to change the context of the conversation.  In other words, one is about how groupies act, and the other is how he acted.    All with that simple change.

All you have to do is listen to the entire recording to hear the context of the conversation to understand this was just a casual conversation about how women act around him.

2.  Faking News Reports using Green Screens.

CNN is admittedly the one news organization who gets caught on this.   The oldest I found was back at least 20 years ago where a reporter faked the news report and the footage is very clear on this.

Here is the oldest I found….

There are other examples, one that comes to mind is the Boston bombing, where they tried to fake the locations of an interview.

There is a multitude of green screen news reports that reduce the legitimacy of the news story and erodes the public trust from CNN.    Here is a video which highlights the most blatant ones.

What to look for?   The pixelation of the person on the green-screen.   The disappearance of body parts, or other objects being held by the reporter.

3.   Pushing an agenda.

All networks are notorious for this.   Fox seems to be the ONLY one who leans to the right.  The others are all part of the left.   This was obvious during the election coverage when we heard basically almost all good things from the left wing media outlets and all bad things about Trump.   This was done using the above methods.  Omitting certain facts, taking sentences Trump said out of context etc.

4.  Gate-keeping.

This is pretty bad because this is ultimately lying.    And this is why CNN now is being called fake news.     Gate-keeping is when they tell you only the facts or information THEY want you to hear.    For example, they will hold those live debates with a panel of people.  Usually 3 who follow their agenda and 1 who doesn’t.    Then when the person who is against their agenda speaks and starts speaking about facts that are provable, the other three with try shouting over the person, including the host, and if that doesn’t work they cut the feed in some way.  Most of the time citing they “lost the feed”.     Don Lemon, doesn’t even try anymore.   If he encounters someone he interviews who brings out verifiable facts, he just shuts down the interview.

5. Rinse and Repeat.

Do you notice CNN is still harboring the “Russian Hack” story over and over?    That is because a lie repeated can sometimes be believed if repeated long enough by enough people.   This is what they are trying to do with this whole Russian Hack story.  They claim to have proof but yet the FBI and CIA both have stated that while there was a hack by the Russian’s there was no evidence to show that it had influenced the election in any way.   And yet, over and over again they still talk about it and how they magically have proof but never present it.      They expect us the audience to eventually believe it because if it is reported enough then it must be true!

Now as a side note, most people think “fake news” are things like the National Enquirer etc, “Aliens ate my baby!” sort of stories.  Or the Onion etc.  And yes, they are correct.  Those are fake news stories.  Meant to be comedic in nature.       However, when Trump or commentators, or pundits call a news organization fake news, it is due to the above ways they have manipulated their audiences.      It is the reason why many news anchors of the past have left their media outlets and started their own news outlets online.

So please, the easiest way to see if a news outlet is lying is go to the source of what they are reporting.    Trump it’s pretty easy.   He posts on Facebook what he says and usually includes videos if he is doing a press conference or a news interview.    So you can hear directly what he had said in it’s proper context.

Dear Feminists and Canadian Universities…. This is what happens when you belittle, and demean half the worlds population.

Dear Feminists and the Universities of Canada,

I’m writing this to tell you something.    Don’t try to use your feminist logic to assume I’m saying something else.  I’m not.   What I say, is what I mean.

I am not making a threat.  I am making a statement.

This open letter is in regards to the online comments that have been made recently online, by the kids in 4chan.   So far, their comments, which have not been threats, but you chose to view this as a threat, and that is fine.    I state this is fine, because, for you to feel threatened, you must think that these people must have reason to be angry with you, and in that logic, you are correct.

Universities have allowed feminist ideology to infest campus doctrine and has spread like a bacterial infection that resists any antibiotics.     It attacks men at every chance it can,   It’s professors are there to teach reason and logic, and instead teach illogical, nonsense in gender studies courses.

During their university days, they are inundated with rhetoric of hate.  Hate against men.   That one in four men in college will commit an act of rape, or that they will be rape upwards of five times in their life.  That a woman, who is strong and independent, cannot accept responsibility of consent when she has been drinking, and has been raped, regardless of her approval for sexual intercourse, and yet the man, who is equally drunk, is responsible for his consent.  (All of which are lies)

Due to the illogical thought process,  that feminists now have, all due to the gender studies courses and their so called professors, they come out hating the world and blaming men for their lack of direction, lack of education, and are unable to get jobs.     They go on to blame men, yet again, via the mythical patriarchy, and the equally mythical wage gap, which of course has been debunked by even prominent feminists.

You teach these young women, to be entitled to whatever a man earns, instead of earning it for themselves, like other strong independent women have done throughout the ages.   You teach them that they need to do whatever they need to do, to steal a man’s earnings, ruin a man’s life, and even to lie, when it comes to rape, assault and other serious crimes.

This is not only affecting young women in serious ways, but young men as well.   The toxic nature of feminism in universities, has caused young men who participate in these gender studies courses to loose their sense of self and become self hating, looking for approval from their female counterparts.  Seeking not only approval but a sense of identity.  By teaching things like CIS gender, and that masculine behavior is toxic to society, you are teaching hatred.   These young men come out of universities with low self esteem, many have lost their identities that took a lifetime to build, and even question their gender orientation, causing physical harm, emotion harm and in some cases, death by suicide.

Universities used to be places of learning, but have now become places of hate.   They preach, that is okay for women to be allowed “safe places”, but not men.   Groups like CAFE are attacked, when they wish to have meetings to discuss men’s issues that affect them, but because they do not accept the feminists narrative, they get called  a hate group, and are attacked at every chance.

Feminists are not what they used to be in the eighties or nineties.    Those women were true feminists.  They wanted equal treatment, not special treatment.  They wanted to be able to sleep with whomever they wished and accepted the consequences of doing so.   Today’s feminists that are coming out of the Canadian Universities, do not want to accept any responsibility for anything.  They don’t want to work as hard as everyone else, they do not wish to earn those positions of prestige, like being members of a board.    They refuse to listen to reason and don’t understand why their choices, affect their earning potential, or even that by choosing to sleep around, without protection, that they will be mothers when they are not ready, and end up miserable.

This is why, you have been seeing those online comments as threats dear feminists and universities.    This is why your guilty conscious, perceives angry comments online as threats and not comments.  It is because deep down, you know you are doing something wrong.

And you know what Universities and Feminists?   You do deserve it.  If you continue, the way you have, things could get worse.   Men in general have formed groups outside of your college campus’, they have joined online communities to discuss these issues.    Some see you as a joke, some see you as harmless, but some, do not see you as anything but a threat, and sadly, those are the young men who are surrounded by the hate on campus’s across Canada, and even the United states.

Now here is a dose of truth, and reality.   Women are treated very well in western society.   They are not treated equal, no.  They are actually treated superior than men.   They get so much preferential treatment due to their gender, that men, are dying because of it.

Your own universities have incentives to get women into the campus’, and stem branches of learning.   Incentives which you profit from, and due to this men are lagging behind in education.   Not equal.

In law, women are treated as victims, even when they commit crimes.   It is less likely a jury will convict a woman than if the defendant was a man.  If a man goes to trial, the chances of him going to jail for the same crime a woman does rises significantly.

In society, if a woman is beating a man in public, he is laughed at, and teased, and accused of “deserving” it, by both men and women.   If a man beats a woman in public, or even defends himself from an attack from a woman, then he is accused of being a criminal.

In the workplace, women can make a complaint about sexual harassment, without any evidence or proof and it is taken seriously.   If a man makes the same complaint about a woman, it is treated lightly and even ignored.

The real feminists attained equality for their gender decades ago.    It is now time to stop the gender studies courses.  It is time to turn to real learning.

Stop teaching hate, stop teaching young minds to hate half the population.  Or you may find that half the population will fight back, and by looking at today’s society, that time may not be that far off.

Yours Truly.
A Man

I thought I heard it all… until today.

Confused_baby

Today I heard a term I first heard on South Park and never heard about again.  At the time, I had no clue what South Park was joking about and frankly, laughed along with the episode, (Cartman is fucking funny!)

Today,  I ran into it again.  It was on a youtube video from a self described CIS male feminist, about why he needs feminism.  He started his dialog with describing himself as a “Identifying as CIS with his assigned gender”.    This caused me to do a search online for the term and get more information.

Here is the Wikipedia entry on it.

Cisgender and cissexual (often abbreviated to simply cis) describe related types of gender identity where individuals’ experiences of their own gender match the sex they were assigned at birth.[1] Sociologists Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook define cisgender as a label for “individuals who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their personal identity” as a complement to transgender.[2]

Please read that entry carefully.   If you are scratching your head, it is the same reaction I had.  There are a few issues with this.

Gender isn’t “assigned at birth”.   You are either male or female.   That is the way it is.  You can’t magically assign a baby with a penis as female or vice versa,   So by identifying your self as CIS your basically saying without saying it your male or female.  In the case of the experience with the video, he was male.

He continued by stating he needed feminism because while being CIS he didn’t fit the “Idea” of male by others and would experience shaming etc from other males or females.    So his reasoning was to join a group of females and males who are for the oppression of men.      He then continues and talks about how he has trouble finding potential dating partners and it is obvious he is leaving out pronouns in his descriptions.   For example he will not say He or She.  It’s always partner.   So for me being a gay man, and having seen this over and over and over and over and over for almost thirty years, I pegged him as being gay and in the closet.  Which if he was in the states, I can understand why depending on which state he is in.

CIS?  I’m so floored by the idiocy of the feminists and yet am in awe.  Not because they are great.  I’ve made it clear in previous pages that I hate feminism and all it stands for, but for the way it has interwoven so much into society that is can turn anyone from identifying from their gender to some fake one.

According to feminist theories from what I am reading they basically want to eliminate any type of gender identity.  That’s right.  They want eliminate the idea I’m a man because I have a beard, or that we identify a woman because she doesn’t have a beard etc.

I am honestly thinking I have to hit my head on a brick wall to make myself stupid enough to believe this garbage.  And yet we have millions of young girls going to university, spending billions of dollars in tuition to learn this in gender studies.

And these young feminists wonder why their Bachelor in Gender Studies has no value in the world?

Feminist Myth’s – Check your male privilege at the door. The lies Feminists tell Society.

male-privilege-female-oppression

I’ve been watching videos on you tube about men’s rights advocates and activists forming men’s support groups for men’s issues over the past few weeks.   After doing reading and investigating this I’ve come to realize that we have been lied to.

We have been lied to by the feminists for generations.   We have allowed the integration of feminist dogma to influence law and allowed them to teach new generations their ideals in schools.

I’m not against any ideas that are logical and make sense.    I’m really not, but I never really look closely at feminist logic or ideas that closely until recently.   After all, I grew up being told that women are strong and are equal to men and that rape is rape and should never be accepted.

Any logical, thinking human being can agree to the above paragraph.   It’s not until you delve into the myths deeper that you can see the flaws, and I do called a myths because it turns out, that all their assertions about men are completely false.

Let’s look at the rape statistic every feminist pulls out on universities and colleges for students.   The dogma we hear everywhere and I do mean everywhere.  In the news, print, radio, even tv shows, we hear that One in Four women will be raped in the course of their college career.    This is scary and instills fear into women, along with anger.   This statistic is completely false and should be looked at with reason.    By looking at the statistics from the places that have colleges or universities, the statistics actually show a different story.   Turns out the real figure is One in almost Thirteen Hundred.  (1 in 1300).  And depending on the area that ratio is smaller 1 in 5000.   That means rape is actually rare.   So the assertion of 1 in 4 or 5 is complete and utter nonsense.

So where did that stat come from?   It came from a badly written piece of drivel by a man hating feminist in the 70s who stated in her book that she wanted all but ten percent of men dead (10 percent for breeding stock).    In her book she stated that 1 in 4 men would rape a woman on a college campus.   No source for that stat was ever cited in that book and has been disproved by rational people over and over and over again.

Another assertion these feminists make is that women are the victims of abuse at the hands of men.   That men are violent and cause most of the violence in domestic partnerships.

I used to believe that one as well, until I looked at numbers and dug deeper.    The ratio of domestic violence is about 50/50.  Men are abused by women just as much as women are.   There is a skewed outlook here on this and women use this to their advantage that many feminists will claim they don’t.

If a man beats a woman, he is automatically thrown in cuffs and taken to jail.  The woman will get support via many publicly funded means.   Support groups, mental health professionals, and even battered women’s shelters.

If a woman beats a man, he is thrown in cuffs and taken to jail, and has to prove he is not at fault.    Usually, the woman is in tears when the police arrive and are trained to automatically assume the man is guilty.    In the rare cases where the woman is arrested, she is more likely to either be put in the drunk tank for the night and let go in the morning with no charges or if charges are laid, gets an extremely light sentence like probation.

I experienced this years ago before I became a legal adult.   So fortunately I was protected by my youth and the fact the woman in question’s testimony was an outright lie.

Here is what happened.   I had asked to borrow money because I need to pay someone back and I hadn’t been paid at my new job.  So, when I asked my “friend’ she went into a rage.  And I mean, she was nice as pie one second and then red faced and screaming at me the next.   I tried to get away from this after taking her rage calmly for 10 minutes or so.   I walked away.  Unfortunately, we lived in an apartment complex (her being in another unit on a different floor) and when I went to the elevator she followed.   All the while screaming and yelling at the top of her lungs.    Berating me, calling me derogatory names and spitting.     Then, because i didn’t react to her behavior, she hit me in the face.     Now I have been taught not to hit women, but something triggered and I slapped her back.  Open handed, and not as hard as she hit me.  It was enough that it snapped her out of her rage and she stopped and went back to her unit.

Now many “Feminists” would look at that and say I was in the wrong that I shouldn’t have hit her etc etc.    That “snap” in me was my instinct for self preservation, and I had felt trapped by her and when she attacked, I instinctively slapped back in defense.   It stopped the attack and I managed to get away.

Feminism would have you believe that I was the aggressor in that situation.   That she was defending herself with the first slap in preparation of being attacked by me a man.   So in their logic, I’m at fault and the woman is the victim and shouldn’t have any responsibility or blame.

The absurdly in that feminist logic defies laughter.  It is so harmful, but it permeates society so ingrained that people don’t even see the illogic to it.

To make matters worse in that situation, after she left and I got away from her rage, she called the police.   She told them, that I had come to her for money (True) and that when she refused to give it to me (Lie), that I had beat her closed fisted.(Lie)  She said in her police statement that she dropped to the ground to protect herself from my fists beating her (Lie) and that I continued to beat her for a few minutes (lie) and then fled the scene.   Leaving her to call the police.

The absurdity in her statement is apparent when compared with my version of the story.  However, if you take the two accounts and compare, most would still take the woman’s side.  After all I’m a man.   However, there is a slight problem of evidence is which is why the charged were dismissed.    You see, at the time I was 5ft 10, and weighed approximately 175lbs.   She was approximately 5ft tall and weighed approximately 110lbs wet.

When the police came to the call they made note that she was not injured and didn’t have single mark on her and refused to go to the hospital and even told police that she had no injuries.   Yet in her statement, she claimed I had beat her to the ground.

Logic says that if I did that there would be injury to her in some way, even from dropping to the ground.  She would have had bruising and and marks from the so called beating.    There wasn’t and so when it came before a judge, the lawyers felt bad for me and didn’t want my life ruined so they “forgot” to tell her about the trial date and time and when she didn’t show my case was dismissed and the record was wiped clean (I was a minor at the time, she was an adult).

If it wasn’t for the compassion of the prosecution lawyer and mine at the time, I’m sure I would have been found guilty.  Simply because she called the police first and because the woman’s word is always favored before a man’s in court.    And technically under law at the time I did commit assault.  So the only way to get me out of that bind was for the legal teams on both sides to do something tricky and not tell her the real trial date and time.

That was my personal experience when I was 17 years old, and even though I experienced it firsthand the violence and lies of a feminist woman, I still believed the dogma and lies they perpetuated.

Another lie they represent is that women are strong but yet are all victims.   In truth this is an excuse to get their own way.  If they don’t you as a man are oppressing them and so they are the victim.

When it comes to earning money, they claim there is a wage gap.  This is a huge lie and one of the biggest.  In Ontario, the government spent a huge amount (approx a billion dollars), to create a measure to test business and industry to find the areas were women are paid less and to create laws that force employers to pay women the same as men.

What they found was that there was no wage gap.  One business, had a 3 cent wage gap.  That was all. That was the only gap they found and the employer corrected the gap and when the women were asked if they noticed a difference the answer was no.

The truth is different when you look at the stats.  Women are more inclined to choose different professions than men.  Those “male dominated” workplaces are a half truth.  There are fields that are dominated by women as well.
In the stats, it shows that the women will chose fields that give them flexibility in scheduling over money.   While men will choose fields that pay them more but are more dangerous and require long hours or being away from family.

These stats make more sense when you see the stats for men concerning work place injury etc.  When it comes to injuries at work, roughly only 2% are women and the rest are men.   Such a huge gap!   This matches with the stats.
Feminists will ignore this.

The whole idea we have to take women at their word is the core of the feminist dogma.  They expect and train us men to believe this from birth.   If you don’t believe this is true, then just use logic.

Women are the primary care givers of children.   Even in today’s society.    Women are the ones who in our formative years will teach us not to hit girls, to respect girls and even protect girls.    We grow up and because it was taught to us, and reinforced over and over, it becomes part of us.

We go into adult hood believing this with the idea that women are strong and independent, but conflicts with us because we have been also been taught they are victims and we should protect them.    Little girls are taught the same thing but are also taught it’s okay to hit boys simply because they see women and other little girls getting away without penalty when they hit a boy.
So really in truth, the feminists who decry the men’s issues groups as hate groups are just running on illogic and lies.  They have no concept of the harm they are doing to society and men have just as much right to form groups for support and discuss men’s issues as women do.

Some of the issues are
Abuse of men by their partners (men and women)

Issues regarding homelessness (majority of men comprise the homeless, and that inclused gay teens)

The high rate of suicide in men.

Legal issues facing men.

Oppression of men throughout society.

And if you scoff at the last one then you really don’t understand what men go through.  Men are definitely not privileged. We don’t get special laws to protect us, we don’t get special treatment because of our body parts.

Years ago I tried to get a loan or a grant through the government to start my own business.   At the time before  they cut all of them out there was all sorts for people to get.   However,  I noticed one thing.   As a male I was not eligible for any of them.

There was grants and loans for LGBT, People of different races, women,   However, if you were a white male you couldn’t get a grant or loan from the government to start your small business.  I could have gotten one under the LGBT grant but that required the business to benefit the gay community solely and be non profit so I wasn’t eligible for that really since I wanted to open a coffee shop.

So my “male” privilege didn’t help me there either.   All my life I’ve had to work hard for what I have.  No one gave it to me, I earned it.  I’m not privileged in any way by my gender.  The opposite is true.  I constantly hear everywhere that I am bad, and violent due to my gender and because of that I’m the cause of every problem in the world.   We as men of all races are rapists, murderers, thieves and deadbeats.     Any male that tells you they aren’t feeling oppressed with this kind of society is mentally flawed and indoctrinated into this feminist myth and lies.

I laugh when I see on these videos of conferences when males stand up and proudly announce that they are a feminist and are leaving their privilege at the door.   Inwardly I weep, because they are just so indoctrinated, that they proudly proclaim that they are less then equal to women and that women are more.    I watch their faces and listen to the tone of their voices and many actually sound scared and look around to make sure the nearest feminists smile and approves of their statement. When they do the male then relaxes and continues to speak.   You hear it with the statement of “I’m so and so and I’m a feminist, and I am checking my privilege”.   Or something like that.  Every video I watched of these kids has them justifying their right to speak with that sentence.     None of them just say I’m so and so and here is my question.  Nope.  They always have to apologize for being male.

And that is not equality.  That is oppression of men.

Anger .. The cause of much…

I was online earlier today and noticed a comment on a friend’s status about an article that appeared in the canadian news papers about a Canadian kid who went over to ISIS and made a video to warn Canada.

Now, please understand. I don’t like war.  I think it should be avoided at all costs.  I do know that sometimes, just sometimes it is justifyable.   I also look at these stories with a grain of salt when it comes from the mainstream, and i don’t look at it from angry eyes.

My friend’s anger was almost of a nature of fire and brimestone.  He condemned the kid in the story, called him traitor, denouncing him for joining a cause.

My friend in question was from anger, real anger derived from coming from Lebannon, a country were war is real and religious hate groups are real.  He has family that still lives there in fact.

The anger directed at ISIS and ISIL is to me, crazy and extreme in itself.   People are righteous in their hatred and anger for them without really able to express why.

I pointed out to my friend that coming from a view that I had no emotional attachment going either way I could see why and how these groups have sprung up and quite frankly, don’t blame it for happening.   I believe we Canadians would do the same if we were in their positions.   In fact, history shows we have in our early beginnings.   Not based on Religion but on a goal.

This is the same for ISIS and ISIL.   I can’t see them as some monster in the dark who will cut off my head.  I can’t, and anyone who looks at the world with an open mind, will see what caused this situation in the first place.   Plus when you have watched this all your life, in these countries then you can see the progression and know that these groups are desperate people.

Now before you go on a rant, think for a moment.

These countries used to be peaceful for the most part.  Every once in awhile one would break out in war and always,  ALWAYS, the american military would be there.   When I was younger, I would watch the news and it was always put forth that the american troops were there to stabilize the middle east.  To bring peace again to a “war torn” nation.   We don’t hear that anymore, we don’t even see the media even try to tell us that anymore.

Many of these countries are very powerful.   The reason for this is they are oil producing countries that control a huge portion of the world’s oil supply.   By destabilizing their governments and plunging those countries into wars, the american government can send troops in under the pretense of protecting the people and oh, protecting the oil as well.

I remember watching on the news, the footage of the american troops on the oil fields trying to put out fires.   Spouting flame from the ground going a mile high into the air under high pressure and extreme heat.   Yeah.   Very rarely did I see footage of a soldier saving civilians in those countries. I did happen, but now that I think back on it, it was usually when the world started to question the american involvement.  That would be when we would see footage of soldiers carrying injured children from rubble to get medical attention (allegedly).

Now here we are almost 40 years later, those middle eastern countries are in no better shape then when I was a kid.   New groups have sprung up and of course the media and the western governments condemn their actions and outrage follows from civilians who look no further than the 2 minute news story on their tv screens or the newspaper column.

This is where i have issues.   We have a means at our disposal that gives us more information, more quickly than the news media can put out.  The Internet.

I myself use this as a source.   Like all sources, it is not always reliable and sometimes it can be dead on reliable.

I look at all sides of the picture and come to my own conclusions, and I don’t assume the view that is portrayed my mainstream media.   Why?  They simply don’t check sources anymore.

I look at the videos and blogs from the people of those countries, the videos and blogs of the soldiers themselves.

Did you know there is a huge amount of videos of US soldiers who are condemning what is being done and they also testify on camera that they are being ordered to kill, rape and beat innocent civilians in those countries?   They get awarded by their superiors for their “first kills”.     One horrific story, a squad, raped a teenage girl, and forced her father to watch and then they set them on fire.   In that particular video, he showed footage from the building where it was done and you could see the blackened cement where the fire burned the bodies.

Those are just some tiny examples of what war is.  So imagine when you live in a country that is constantly bombarded by the Americans, from afar.  Whole families are killed by gunfire in an entire apartment complex, because the Americans want to kill 1 person in that building.

Generations have lived in those conditions.  Over and over and over again.  Not one person hasn’t had a person killed by either side.

Imagine if that was your world.  Unfortunately I have a vivid imagination and can see this all to well.

Out of that anger, then springs up groups that want to take their homes back, their lands, and their country and bring peace.   So these militant groups spring up and organize and fight back.   Some are military trained some aren’t.  That doesn’t matter.  It’s the goal.  The goal to get their lands back and stop the killing from foreign troops.   They use any means at their disposal, because they are outnumbered, and outgunned.  They are desperate and want their country back and to know what peace is, because they simply never have seen peace.   Never lived in a place where they didn’t have to fear getting shot when leaving their home, or being able to go to sleep at night wondering if they would wake up at sunrise or die by a midnight bombing of their home.

That constant barrage of fear will spring hatred.  That hatred becomes driving force in many militant groups and religion will even bring that to the forefront.

So I do understand why and how these groups spring up.   I do also know where the blame lies.  It really isn’t with the religion or with militant groups.   They are fighting for their lives.

You have to look back in history to see what is happening and to the cause   And it all started with the invasions by the american forces.    If the american and Canadian troops left those areas, then peace eventually would come back to those countries.   And eventually the anger would fade.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/12/07/john-maguire-an-isis-fighter-from-ottawa-appears-on-video-warning-canada-of-attacks-where-it-hurts-you-the-most/

Law Society

The law society is a society.  It’s member’s practice law.  They are the ones we call when we have a legal issue and need someone in court.

Remember what I said about societies in my first post?   This is a society.  It was created by and owned by, you guessed it.  The banking family.  The ownership of every company called a law society in the world in any country that was conquered, acquired or colonized by England has one.   The law society has it’s own members who pay their dues and in return they get the protection of their society and as well, they have their own language.   They don’t admit to it,  and after many conversations with lawyers who think I’m incorrect, I’ve found out they don’t even teach their new lawyers about law dictionaries anymore.  Many believe that book form law dictionaries like “Black’s Law Dictionary” is a myth or a hoax.

I call these so called lawyers, ill informed.   And what’s worse, is they won’t believe you, even if you show them the truth.  I had a few months long discussion with one, and I kept citing the law dictionary and he refused to believe it because according to him, the law dictionaries have no basis in law.  Even though they define the words he uses in law everyday.

The law society is a twisted concept, that on it’s face seems noble and honorable.  It is, the arm that holds society back.   It enforces it’s will on all who come within it’s walls and it’s not for the benefit of the people but the crown corporation.

The words they use are a twisted form of English to make people think they are speaking English.  They have redefined simple common place words, to have a slightly different meaning so they can have an advantage.

Driver is my favorite.  As they keep changing it’s definition to try to gain the advantage in court.   Every new edition of a law dictionary has a new definition of this word because people keep fighting this in court.   For my example I will use the original definition and I will go on to explain why this is important.

The original definition said

One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle,with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car. See Davis v. Petrinovich, 112 Ala. 654, 21 South. 344, 36 L. R. A.615; Gen. St. Conn. 1902,

Law Dictionary: What is DRIVER? definition of DRIVER (Black’s Law Dictionary)

Now, the key words here is employed to conduct.   Employed (Hired or working) to conduct .. meaning to transport either goods or people.

This makes sense since the government by it’s own words is supposed to manage the resources of the lands and manage trade within and without the lands.   A driver then under that definition would be a commercial driver.  One who is using the roads (public roads) for personal gain.  So it makes sense to me that a “Driver” should be licensed and taxed for the money they make using the public roads that I as a non driver pay for via the gas tax.

So anyone really who makes a living transporting goods or people using the roads is a driver. At least under that legal definition.   This definition comes directly from the law society.

Yet we are forced to pay for driver licenses and taxed on it every year on our birthdays.   Many people don’t think of this that way and that is due to the twisting of the language.   Another thing in law they don’t tell you is the word MAY is synonymous with the word MUST.   Basically in law you can switch the one word for the other.   So when you read on the provincial government websites for drivers licenses you will see it say you MUST get a drivers license.   This is legalese again.  They use this to trick you into believing that you have to get a commercial license to use the roads you already pay for.

The public misconception is that a drivers licence magically makes you safe on the roads and competent to drive a vehicle.  Despite the fact there are thousands of accidents every day, by allegedly “competent drivers”.    Despite the fact that, up until the early sixties, people didn’t need a licence to drive a car on the roads for personal use.   It wasn’t until they used legalese in their wording on the documents that people began to believe the myth that a plastic card made you safe on the roads.    By that simple legalese trickery by substituting the word MAY with MUST, they ensured a billion plus dollars every year, plus fines from tickets, because tickets by the way are commercial bills in their nature.  I will get into that in another post.

The law society dictates what the words mean in their legalese.  Seemingly common words we take for granted have vastly different meanings or multiple meanings they use at will without our knowledge.    Look at it this way, in Quebec they speak a more guttural and slang version of french.  In Paris they speak a true form of french.   We speak English and the law society speaks a bastardized version of it.

Due to the fact the law society is a registered corporation and is also owned by the same people who own the government, they use that advantage to manipulate the people that they get true justice in all levels of court.  The lower court system isn’t about fairness or justice.  It’s about making money.  That branch brings in money in fines, fees and judgement’s in favor of the crown.  Not the Queen, the crown corporation.   They are a court of contracts.  This is why all lower court judges won’t answer the question if they are working for the crown corporation or the queen.  The can’t because then no one would listen to them anymore.

Another thing many people don’t realize about the law society, or rather they are beginning to suspect, is that they protect their own.  A judge is just a lawyer in a black dress.  He oversees cases and makes judgement on them in lower courts.   The usual penalty is a fine.  Which goes to the crown corporation.   That’s his job.  It’s not to ensure justice. It’s making money.  The judge, the crown prosecutor and the lawyer you hire, are all members of the same society.  They work together.   In many circumstances, judges are also chosen from the city attorney pool, usually a crown prosecutor will get promoted to judge.  And that is based on how many convictions he has gotten in his favor.  That means the more he wins and the more fines the crown makes, the better his chances at a promotion.   The judge, because they usually come from the prosecution side of the equation, are biased and tend to judge in favor of the crown.  This way he gets his bonus’s and raises.  They both get paid from the same source as well.

This is the system the law society set up.    Next blog post will be on the court rooms and the scams they do there.

Some words to look up are

Person

Driver

Monster

Some dictionaries you can find online are Black’s Law dictionary, Canadian Law dictionary.    You can also find these law dictionaries in ebook form and to buy in book stores.   Be aware, according to the current crop of lawyers out there, these books are a myth, hoax or don’t mean anything.