Vaccine Facts (Honest Facts).

I decided to write about this again, because this topic is one that for me, is very important.    There are more calls each year for forced vaccinations in Canada, and I am 100 Percent against.   However, the people who are for forced vaccinations, are running on misinformation, myths and just plain lies told by the media.

As a side note I researched into this topic for approximately 3 years.   I looked at 100 years plus worth of data, studies, charts and reports.

So here are my facts list in no particular order.

1.  Herd Immunity.     –    This is a theory that states that in order for the population to be “safe”,  that at minimum 95 percent of the population needs to be vaccinated.

This is a mathematical impossibility to get “Herd” immunity.    Approximately 15 percent of the population are unable to be vaccinated due to auto-immune issues, allergies, and other health issues.     So doing the math, 100% – 15% = 85%.    So the herd immunity falls short by 10 percent.

2.  Vaccines are NOT cures.  –  A cure is something that eliminates a disease after you have it.   For example, let’s say you have a cold, and you take a pill that stops the cold.   And you are then cured from the cold.     That is a cure.     A vaccine is not that.    It is a preventative measure and it’s not guaranteed you won’t get sick from the virus that it’s supposed to protect you from.

3.  Vaccines can be dangerous.     –   Taking a vaccine or any medication without knowing possible side effects, or possible adverse reactions is something many do and it’s dangerous.    It’s dangerous for your child, yourself and your family.     Why?    Not all vaccines are created equal.    Some have pages of adverse reactions reported during tests and from the public.     Some have caused children to die.   Some, have caused children to all of a sudden become have severe issues with communication and behavior.   Some have other side effects which is equally damaging.

4.   Flu Shot.   –   Depending on your area, there are one of three flu shots the public gets.    In my area, we get Fluvirin.   So I will use that as an example.     Fluvirin’s main ingredient is one that causes 35% of males to become sterile.    That’s right boys, if you ever want to have kids, this vaccine is not for you.      Everyone should do their homework on the ingredients, not just the vaccines.   In order find out this information I had to look up each ingredient in this vaccine individually because they do not mention infertility in men on the vaccine insert.    Why?  They only put on the reported side effects.    A man does not know he is infertile until he tries to have a child with his partner.    So of course this side effect wasn’t reported during testing.    Nor would it after.   Yet in western nations, where there are infertility problems in both men and women, you can only think that this might be one of the reasons why.

5. Flu Shot part 2. ..  Flu shot is useless.      The flu shot only protects from 3 different flu virus’.   There are over 3000 different strains of flu around the world, and the 3 you get are just the ones that they say they are the most prevalent.   They can’t possibly inoculate against all of them.    This is partly why people will still get sick with the flu, even when they get the shot.      That and the flu shot uses a live virus.   So you are intentionally getting infected with a live flu virus anyway.   Grown in egg embryo.  Which is why people with egg allergies shouldn’t take vaccines.

6.  Vaccinated people are safe vs the people who are not.     –   This is a lie.    The opposite is actually true.   I will use the measles shot but this applies to all of them.     When you get vaccinated and then never get the measles, what happens is a false illusion that your protected.    You are not.   You can still get the disease.    The best time to get measles is when you are child.    A child can fight off the disease easier than an adult.   If your an adult, you can die from it.  As a child, the chances are low.   After the virus has run it’s course you get something that no single vaccinated person will have.  A lifelong immunity to that virus.    Your body is a great machine that has an immune system that learns.    Our body evolved this way to help our species survive.

The people who are vaccinated, eventually that vaccine is not protecting you.   Three to Ten years after you have been vaccinated it stops working.     Most people are not told this or forget, after all things happen, you change doctors, forget the information,  or your doctor doesn’t tell you.    If you were vaccinated as a child you are not protected as a teen or adult.     And NOW, if you get the measles, it can be dangerous.

Meanwhile, people who have not been vaccinated but who have had the disease as a child, they are safe.   They are the ones protected by their immune system.

7.   Live Virus vs Dead Virus vaccines.    –    Dead virus vaccines in my research are well, useless.     The whole purpose of a vaccine is to infect you with a tiny amount of virus.    What your body does is fight the disease and creates an antibody specifically for the virus it fights.     The dead virus is not what you get with a live virus.    So when you get the same strain as a live virus you will get sick, because your body is only able to fight the dead strain.

During testing on many of these dead virus’ and even the live virus, they will look at how much antibodies are produced.   If during lab tests they get a certain number of antibodies then they consider the vaccine a success.     What they do not look at, is the effectiveness of the vaccine fighting the virus.     With a dead virus the antibodies don’t have anything to fight because the virus is dead, but it will produce antibodies which will do nothing because there is nothing to fight.       This is how they say these vaccines are safe and effective.     They are effective at making antibodies, the trick is they are not effective at attacking antibodies.    Listen closely at the news when they have “experts” on talking about it, and they will always state carefully the vaccine is effective but never explain it in detail about the antibody creation vs the antibody fighting the virus.

8.   Vaccines did NOT stop diseases.  –   This is a lie promoted by the media paid for by the pharma companies and government.    They want you to believe the vaccines are the reason diseases like measles almost disappeared.     This is a lie.  A huge one.    Let me explain.

Back in the 1800’s when measles was at it’s height.   A huge number of people had measles and half of them died.    This was approximately 50% of the population, dead.   Everyone knows this, and this kind of stat is used to scare people to vaccinate.    However, here is what they don’t talk about.

When the measles vaccine was introduced to the public,  the disease was almost gone.  Same with polio and the others.     There was a very good reason why these diseases had dramatically gone done.

It had to due to a number of factors,  like technology advances,  personal hygiene education, and others.      From the 1800s to  the mid 1930s the virus had almost gone.   During that time frame we changed a few things.

  1.  Bathing Habits.     Back in the 1800s family would share bathwater.  So the head would start, then the wife, then the children.      By the time the last child was washed, they were in dirty, gross water.
  2.   Clothing … 1800s people would wear the same set of clothing for 3 months straight before washing them.   They would work, eat and sleep in some cases in the same set of clothing.    By the end of the season the clothing would smell, would be infested with fleas and other bugs.
  3.  Feces and Urine.     –  People would have a chamber pot to poop and urinate.   The pot in many cases would be kept in the same room as where everyone slept.   Usually under the bed.     It would be dumped out once a day onto the street or in the backyard.     Due to this kind of sanitation, along with their garbage being thrown on the street or in a pile in the back of the home, it attracted rats and other vermin.    Those vermin had fleas and carried disease.   Since the homes were not sealed effectively many times people lived with rats and vermin in their home and would get the fleas that these pests had, which in turn spread the diseases.

So now we go forward in time and we learned better hygiene standards, washing our hands, bathing everyday and due to technology advances like the invention of the toilet, we no longer poop or urinate in the same room we sleep and it gets flushed away thanks to the invention of sewage pipes and sewage processing facilities.

9.  Other medical advances.    Thanks to the invention of aspirin and other medication that helps lower fevers that helped the survival rate of children who got measles.    Then add in our medical knowledge on fevers and virus’ helps us fight these virus’ even better.

So all these advances have caused childhood diseases to be almost gone by the time vaccines were introduced.

In Canada, it is very difficult to sue a doctor or even a pharma company.   You can do it, but the system is against you.    In the USA, you cannot sue a pharma company over vaccines.   They are protected by the government via the vaccine court.    Yes there is one.  If you have gotten your child vaccinated and they die, or get ill permanently after getting a vaccine, you can petition the court for compensation for medical bills, and to pay for the lifetime care of your now vaccine injured child.   So far that court has paid out to millions of families in the sum of billions of dollars.    Most vaccinated people do not know this, and some who do, do not understand what this court means.

If the vaccines are so safe, and so effective, then why do the western governments go to such great lengths to protect the pharma companies who produce these vaccines?

So for anyone reading this go read the vaccine inserts, learn about the ingredients, learn about the mortality rates in your country, now and a hundred years ago.

If you still want to vaccinate, by all means, that is your choice.    However, if you advocate that a person’s choice to not vaccinate themselves and their family should be forced to vaccinate, well I will fight against that idea every-time.  Simply because it removes our right to choose our medical treatment.

Advertisements

Abortion – “My body My Right!” Why this argument fails to logic and reason.

o-ABORTION-facebook.jpg

Abortion.  Such a touchy subject and one that many women will scream about.   In fact with the current american election looming, the subject has come up due to Hilary’s opinion that the unborn have no rights in law until they are born.   Which means, in her eyes, that a child can be ripped apart via abortion right up until the time labor starts.

This has caused a debate on abortion to renew again.  I’ve seen this debate happen numerous times over  the past forty years.   However, now with age comes wisdom and understanding.

The understanding that “my body my right” is false.     I will list my reasons why.

Let’s begin with conception.    Life starts there.   The mother’s egg is dormant until the father’s sperm penetrates the egg and gives it the spark of life and energy it needs to start cell reproduction.

One of the arguments from women is that they give life or create life.   Technically this is incorrect.   At best you can call a woman an incubator.   They carry and gestate that child in their body but the “spark” that created that life, came from the father.

The cells reproduce and form a child.   During that process there are many stages.    Many argue that there is no “life” until there is a heartbeat or a brain etc.    This really is a strawman argument.  Since as I stated the spark started at inception.

Now, with that being said many argue that the fetus can be aborted right until week 31-35.  In Canada, this is 24 weeks.  This is what a fetus looks like at that time.

fetus24weeks

Now I don’t know about you, but this does not look like a bunch of cells that get scraped off the uterus wall.     Yet, the abortions can and do happen this late.

So the argument of “My Body, My Right” is false.  It disregards the life of the child as nothing.   So I can understand how some could see it as murder.

If anyone has watched the Videos from the investigation into Planned Parenthood, you would have seen the horrors that they present.   Selling the aborted baby parts for profit.   The staff separating brain, legs, arms as if they were never human life.

Then we have father’s rights.   Or rather, the lack of reproductive rights.    Many of the people who argue for abortion always mention that “If the father didn’t want a child, they shouldn’t have had sex”.     This argument is without any kind of reason, coherent thought or logic.    The reason being is, the same logic can be applied to the women.   “If she didn’t want a child she shouldn’t have had sex”.

Now, don’t get me wrong.  I’m not against abortion completely.   I firmly believe there should be allowances in law for it.  Such as cases of women or girls getting pregnant from rape, or incest.   Or in medical needs, such as her life is in danger from the pregnancy.   Those to me seem to be reasonable.

We have had over 50 years in Canada of proper sex education, women have access to more than twenty kind of contraceptive options.   Everyone, and I mean everyone knows the pill is not 100 percent and yet we still have unwanted pregnancies.

So maybe it’s time ladies to stop blaming men for your pregnancy?   Men have 3 options to them.  A condom, Abstinence or a vasectomy.    The power, the choices and the rights are all yours.   So if you get pregnant and it is unwanted, then to me, it is your fault. At least, ninety percent on you.

As, I have written, men do not have rights when it comes to being a father or not.   You scoff and will rant, but it is true.

Men have zero choice in becoming a father.   Once the sperm, penetrates the egg and cell division starts then women have all the power and the choice in society.    If a woman gets pregnant here are her choices.

1.  She can choose to abort.  2.  She can choose to keep the child.  3. She can choose to give the child up for adoption.  4. She can choose to not name the child’s father on the birth certificate.   5. She can choose to force the father to pay child support.  6.  She can choose to let the father give up his so called “parental rights as father”.   7.  She can choose to deny the father any visits to the child.

All the choices are hers.     This is why,  I think the laws  in this country concerning abortion need to take a more balanced approach to, well, every aspect.

We need to have this discussion as a nation.   People need to be honest and less selfish about it and that will start with you ladies, cause we men, don’t have the rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Violating Rights in the Name of Safety?

Human-rights-violations

We all have rights.   Many of those rights are violated today under the guise of “for your safety” or for “public safety”.      Like the era of Hitler when he came into power, pro police and pro authority supporters encourage this.    They praise police when they very obviously have broken the law or violated someone’s individual human rights.
Today I read a very vague article in my local newspaper, that lead me to believe the person mentioned in it had her rights violated.   Which of course prompted a heated debate as I seemed to be the only one who recognized this.

Here is the article:

http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6470583-drunk-woman-spits-in-police-officer-s-face-at-hamilton-hospital/

Now, after reading the article it does not say why she was in the hospital or why she was angry.     So we can only speculate.    I am someone who presumes innocence until proven guilty, so I will presume she is innocent of any crime.

Which leaves only a few reasons for her to act this way.  The most logical and basic is that she was forced there against her will, got angry and spit on the cop.   Who then proceeded to charge her for getting a little wet.

The comment section heated on social media when I mentioned that her rights had most likely been violated by the cops, the medical professions and possibly the paramedics if they used them.

This caused a stir.   People stood up and commented that the cops was assaulted, but really were they?

If you are taken against your will to someplace you didn’t want to go, just because you were drunk, isn’t that kidnapping?   I would think so.  In fact the Legal definition of kidnapping is:

Kidnapping

The crime of unlawfully seizing and carrying away a person by force or Fraud, or seizing and detaining a person against his or her will with an intent to carry that person away at a later time.

This is what they did. That is again assuming that she didn’t want to go and didn’t commit any crimes while drunk.

Many would say that it was for her safety and that makes it right.     Actually no it doesn’t.  The only person who can make that decision is the person in question.    The only time that doesn’t apply is when they are unable to due to mental illness or they are unconscious.

In the 90s, I lived in BC and at that time there was a serious heroin problem.  100% pure heroin was being sold on the streets and anyone who would inject themselves with it would overdose and die within 3o minutes.   This was such a major problem that they had paramedics driving ambulances in the alleys and looking for unconscious drug addicts.

When they found a conscious drug user, they would offer help, and if they person said no they legally could not do anything.    If that happened they would wait until that person lost consciousness and then act.

When I asked the  authorities about that, they said that by law they cannot force a medical treatment against someone’s will unless they were unable to make that decision themselves.   That is to me the right thing to do.

Now back to the woman in the article, if she was drunk and they transported her to the hospital and she refused medical treatment, then forcing her to have it would have made the medical staff at fault.  And the police trying to “deescalate” the situation would not have made it any better.     No means no.     And since the police in this age are not known to be gentle or nice , we can only assume their idea of deescalate was to use force on her to hold her down.   To which the only thing the woman could do to defend herself would be to spit on the cop.

Some paramedics piped up and stated they deal with drunk people all the time who don’t want help and have to “deal” with the violence all the time.  Same with some nurses at the hospitals.     Here is my message you to and to any of these people who think they are helping someone.   “NO MEANS NO.”  Drunk or sober, you do not have the right to force a medical treatment, force someone to go somewhere, without their consent or against their will.   NEVER!   If they attack you in anyway it is within their right to defend themselves because regardless of your intent, you are violating their rights and attacking them”.

Can people understand this?    If a drunk driver is held accountable for their actions of getting in the vehicle and driving while drunk then they have the ability to say no to unwanted help.    If you violate this and take them to a hospital and try to perform a medical procedure, any medical procedure then you are at fault and not the drunk person.

Pass this on and share this.   The more people that get educated on rights, then maybe we can fix this from happening to others.