Comprehensive Guide to Political Left and Right ideologies.

leftright

Many people get confused now, and even don’t recognize the differences in the left and right ideological systems.    They will even deny the existence of certain radical portions of their ideologies.

This is my guide to the left and right political ideologies.   I have created this in hopes to educate and help people understand.

Left.

The left is usually or used to be solely Liberal.   In Canada Liberals were somewhat respected even by those on the right.    There was some ideological differences but overall they got along.    Then the liberal party at some point got hijacked by what is now called progressives.     This will explain the differences between the two groups, and will explain how progressives in the left are not the same as a true liberal, albeit, they will appear similar.

Liberal Ideals.

1.  Free Speech.   

Liberals like free speech.  Even those views that they don’t agree with, they will respect the rights of those speaking it.    Generally most liberals will agree to this.   The ONLY exception is what they consider hate speech.   Which in the original sense (in Canada back in the 90s) was any speech that incited violence to a minority or minority group.      An example of this would be telling people “Kill all fags!”   Not “I believe fags should be killed”.      The 1st is a call to violence.   The 2nd is an opinion.   Liberals back in the 90s, didn’t like the hate speech laws being made but knew it was the only way to help gay people who were being killed, beaten and ignored by police and society.     It had it’s place in time but should have been erased from the criminal code a decade ago.

2.  Freedom of association. 

Liberals agree that this is a human right and we all have the right to associate with whomever we want.   This includes, the freedom to gather and protest.   Whenever and where-ever that protesting is needed.

3.  Equality.

This is the one that is important.   Liberals believe in equality of opportunity.   This means that everyone should have the equal opportunities.   For example,  Jessica is a black woman who is being interviewed for a job.   She is competing with a white man, and an  Asian man.     Their employer who is liberal will consider all three candidates based on their experience, and qualifications.    Their gender, sexuality, race have nothing to do with the hiring process.      All are equal in the opportunity for the position.

 

4. RACISM

Liberals are against racism and tend not to see people by the color of their skin, but the content of their character.

Liberals are more closer to the middle, but still left.     They tend to be tolerant and open to other views.   They show compassion and courtesy to even those they disagree with.

 

Now lets talk about Progressives.

Progressives are considered to be far left by many.   Their views are not based on liberal views but really on race, gender, sexuality.

1.   Freedom of Speech.

Progressives do not like freedom of speech.  They say they do but want limits on that speech. The only speech they like is speech that they like.  They want any speech that “offends” them to be banned.  They can’t ban speech, so they try to stop people from hearing the speech.     They love the current hate speech laws due to the fact the current hate speech laws in Canada are vague.    Here is the portion that describes hate speech in the criminal code of Canada.

“Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code make it a criminal offense to advocate genocide, publicly incite hatred, and willfully promote hatred against an “identifiable group.”

An identifiable group is defined as any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation or mental or physical disability.

The Code provisions are intended to prohibit the public distribution of hate propaganda. Private speech is not covered by the provisions: the act of promoting hatred can only be committed by communicating statements other than in a private conversation, and inciting hatred is only prohibited if statements are communicated in a public place. Online communications that advocate genocide or willfully promote or incite hatred are likely to fall within the provisions because the Internet is a public network.

Under section 320(1) of the Code, a judge has the authority to order the removal of hate propaganda from a computer system that is available to the public. Such authority extends to all computer systems located within Canada. To date, however, only one case has been successfully brought under that provision, in the province of Quebec. [2]”

What is vague is not the inciting of violence.  Everyone agrees to that.  What is in dispute is the rest.   Which I may add was easily added later by lawmakers silently.

The second part makes it illegal to say “I believe fags should die. ” .    The other parts make it so you can’t even write it.   Or share it.   My blog could be considered a hate crime if a progressive was to see it and report it.

2.  Freedom of Association.

Progressives do not like it when people they don’t agree with gather.    We have many examples of this.     The protests when men’s rights advocates gather to speak on men’s issues.     The protests and riots when conservative speakers go to a university to speak to people who voluntarily go to hear what they have to speak.   Their aim to stop people from attending.

3.  Equality.

The typical progressive wants equality of outcome.   Not just opportunity.     The difference of outcome is explained easily by the wage gap myth.   They expect the same money that men make, as the result of a lifetime.    They don’t understand, either by willful ignorance or by simply not being able to use reason and logic.     Women have been proven via the wage gap that they make different decisions in life.   They choose more humanitarian careers like in health fields nursing, health care, etc.   They dominate in certain fields but at the same time those fields pay less.    They choose these fields because of they get the ability to have more time off, for health, family, vacations etc.    Men on the other hand, will sacrifice more to be able to advance in their careers.   So they will take more dangerous jobs like policing, firefighters, military,  construction, oil rig worker, miner etc.   These jobs are higher risk for loss of life so they pay more than say a nurse.

The progressive doesn’t agree this is the reason for a gap.   They can’t.   They think that women should get the same pay as men period.   So the grand overview of the wage gap is their dragon to slay.    People who use reason and logic understand the differences and why this is wrong.

So to give an example:    Linda works for an Software company.   She was hired at the same time as Bob.  They both started in this company and have been working there a year.    Both started at the same wage.     Linda, decides to take time off to have baby.    She gets a year maternity leave.   During that time while she was away Bob worked hard, worked overtime and gained a raise and a promotion, while keeping up with the current technological advances which helped the company.     Linda comes back to work and finds she is out of date with her technological knowledge and needs more training before she can get back to work.    After a month of retraining she is back to working what she was doing.    However, now that she has a child, she rarely is able to work overtime, and in some cases has to ask her boss to leave early.      Bob doesn’t.    He is still working overtime and works hard.     Linda, gets a call and has to leave work in the middle of the day because her child is sick with the flu and has to go home to take care of the child.     Bob continues working, getting in a project ahead of schedule.     Linda comes back to work a few days later.

Over the course of their careers, Linda has had 2 kids, took 2 years off for maternity, had more time off for family vacations, sick days for the kids, her health etc.    Bob, sacrificed and worked a lot of overtime, earned more money and took less time off, and was more of a benefit to the company and so earned top dollar for his salary.

This is what progressives don’t agree with.   They believe that Linda should have been paid the same as Bob over the course of her lifetime career because she has been with the company the same length of time and had the same job to start with.    A progressive will see that Linda was discriminated against because she was not given the same opportunities as Bob during the career.

4. RACISM

Progressives will divide everyone by race, gender, sexuality, etc.     They see through the lens of victim status on these features of people.   Not on Character.   They label people racist who disagree with their views.   Will conflate genuine concerns over the religion of Islam as racist and will even call people racist for citing facts about communities because it points out a negative issue with that particular community.

Meanwhile they happily will be racist themselves, to white people.   They don’t see white people as a race but as the oppressor.     They will say “Kill all white people” and not understand that is a racist statement.      The ONLY people that are racist you see, are white people.  Therefor they aren’t and can’t be.     Even white progressives will say anti white things to white people.

They will get upset if a white person is proud of being white and what white people have accomplished in their history.   Like putting a man on the moon.     To them, white people should not be proud of the accomplishments, but be ashamed of the bad parts of history, like slavery.

Which brings up another part of the progressive ideology.   Slavery.   They will tell you that white people are the cause of slavery, even though this is not true.  They will ignore history and even attempt a rewrite of history to suit their agenda.

Slavery was NOT started by white people,  in fact no one knows who came up with the idea because it was practiced for thousands of years.    All Races participated.    In fact it still exists in some parts of the world.   White people were the first to STOP.     The American civil war was NOT about freeing slaves but over the establishment of the federal reserve and the central bank.   Lincoln, who was a slave owner himself, who had several children with his female slaves, had in fact garnered the support of black slaves by offering them freedom if they joined his army and that didn’t happen until he was losing the war.

The North Altantic Slave trade was not white people going into Africa to gather up black people.   No.  This is the part that progressives will devoutly  ignore and fight against.    The Tribes of Africa would raid other tribes and take prisoners.   The would invade neighboring countries and get slaves for themselves.    They had white slaves, black slaves, asians etc.     The Tribal leaders in Africa would SELL those people to the Slavers.  Not by threat, but in trade for things they wanted and gold.     Asians as well would raid other nations and take prisoners and sell them as slaves, to other countries and as well as white slavers.

If you hear a progressive you would think that it was ONLY white people enslaving people.    It wasn’t but they will adamantly deny the other races part in that because it undermines their ideological views.

5. Discrimination.

Progressives will happily tell you they don’t discriminate but will want policies that directly discriminate against men.  Particularly white men.    They will want “safe spaces” for women, and minorities and fight against safe spaces for men.   Especially on university campus.

One example would be a university in the USA where progressive students wanted one day without white people on campus.    One professor who was white said no, that it was discriminatory to demand this.     The students in outrage at being told this, protested , threatened the professors life and he had so many threats that he was forced into leaving the school for safety reasons.

Another example would be another professor who called for the genocide of white people, and that was perfectly tolerable by the faculty, staff and students.

I would also add in this topic of racism and discrimination that a progressive see’s nothing wrong with groups that support Hamas, (Palestine), who want to kill all Jews.   Islamic extremists for killing gay people, oppressing women.

The reason being is they are being tolerant of another religion, culture etc.  So child marriage, child rape, raping of women,  female genital mutilation is okay because it is a “cultural” thing.

In Canada, they will go as far as to think it is okay to allow Isis fighters back into Canada without any kind of punishment.      Just today there was a news report of a Canadian doctor who was on the Gaza strip that was killed when a group of “protesters” had tried to climb the wall and blow up the wall.    So the Israel troops fired on them.    The doctor got hit by a stray bullet and died.

The progressives all day have been spouting hatred for the Jews and spouting anti Jewish rhetoric.   Twenty years ago, those people would have been arrested for hate speech.   Today, they are allowed because the progressives believe they are not being racist, bigoted because they believe they are right.   Brown people (muslims) are an oppressed people by the nasty jewish people who are (white).

Progressives are the ALT LEFT of the left.  They are so authoritarian and so extreme that they run on par with KKK, and Nazis.   While fail to recognize they are that bad.

NDP

I’m going to be honest, the NDP are not a major player.   They tend to be Liberal Lite and don’t like progressives, but they themselves will back progressives on occasion.   They aren’t really that special but think they are.

The NDP fall between liberals and the progressives.    Middle left I would call them.

Now….

THE RIGHT!

Conservatives.

Conservatives used to be hugely dominated by the religious.  Mainly the Christians.   Back before education on homosexuality etc, it was a deeply sexist, and homophobic party with an ideology to match.

However today in the modern world, many real liberals have flocked under the conservative banner to stop progressives in the next election.

Back when Harper had been elected as PM (Conservative), he ran on a platform to stop gay marriage.    Fortunately he lost thanks to the supreme court.    And as a result the party stopped fighting against gay rights.     Now, while they don’t openly support gay marriage, they don’t openly go against it and as a result they are opening their party to new ideas.

Conservatives believe now what Classic liberals believe in.   They just don’t openly discuss their views on gay rights.

The one thing they are against is on demand abortion which I can support.     I don’t think killing babies on demand should be allowed.   I do think limits need to be placed.  Such as allowing rape victims or mothers whose life is threatened to be able to abort the child.   Not for a night out of partying and sleeping around and finding out your pregnant.      To many women abuse abortions.   Some use it as a primary birth control method and not as a last resort.     One woman I knew back in my 20s had never used birth control and used abortions as birth control.   She had a total of ten abortions over her short life.  Other women will abuse the privilege by finding out the gender of the child and if the child is not their preferred gender they want they abort and try again.

Conservatives in general tend to be on the right, but close to the middle, due to a few issues that they don’t agree on the left with.

FAR RIGHT.  Or ALT RIGHT

Is the same as progressives, only they are the opposite side.   So KKK, Nazi supporters People who are extremely homophobic, racist to anyone but white people.   Even the Ultra religious are included in this Far Right.    Like the Westboro Church.

The media confuses regular conservatives with the far right because they are all progressives pushing their agenda via the news.    So anyone they deem a threat to their narrative they will spout as Far Right.   And even go as far as try to pin Trump in that category.    Like Doug Ford.   He is a conservative, but is being labeled as the same as Trump.   In the media they treat Trump like he is Far Right.    He isn’t but that is how they see him and so any politician who remotely says the same things gets put in that category as a way to signal to the audience that they are racist on par with the KKK.

This is why people who watch the news get confused when they go watch speeches online by people labeled as Far Right and find their views pretty uncontroversial.

For example they stated that Milo Y.  is an Alt Right Figure head.    Milo is a gay white christian Jew, who is married to a black man,  who advocates for equal rights for all .     The media and the progressives will name him Alt Right because somehow they think he is racist, bigoted and even claim he is homophobic.


The progressive left and the media that is also progressive left will lead you to believe that anyone who isn’t on their side is evil.   They will attack all of these political parties by using SLURS.

Racism.   Misogyny.   Homophobic.   Trans phobic.  Islamophobic.

When you try to debate a progressive you will recognize them by their SLURS.    Most of their arguments are not based on facts but by feelings and when you challenge that with facts, they will resort to SLURS on your character every-time.

I personally blame feminism in it’s modern form because of inter-sectionalism.     I won’t define it here, but you can find it online.     Feminism is a form of Marxism, even with socialism mixed in.     It is why there is a hatred of men .    It is an ideology that generations have been indoctrinated into.     Which we are seeing the result in progressive ideology and their blind hatred of Donald Trump.

He is the epitimy of the patriarchy.   A Rich, Old, White Man, with a Beautiful supermodel wife.   Who is the leader of the free world.

This is why the progressives went into mass meltdown when Trump got elected.    He is the symbol of EVERYTHING they hate.    It’s why the progressive media won’t ever say anything good about Trump, even when it’s obvious Trump is doing a very good job.   They will deny it and make claims that it was Trump but someone else.    For example when Trump got people back to work by creating tax cuts and jobs came back.   Unemployment went to an all time low in over a decade.    Unemployment in black communities were at the lowest since the 60s.   Yet, they refused to admit that was Trump and tried to say that it was due to things Obama did that are now coming to fruition.

Even Canadian Progressives become unhinged at Trump.     I personally have lost friends over my support of Trump.   Those so called friends could not believe a gay man could support Trump.   Nor can they now believe I will support Sheer or Ford.

They hate the Carbon tax but don’t want to vote someone in who will get rid of it.    They hate high electricity bills but refuse to support the people who will reduce those bills.

All because of their ideology.

The upcoming elections in Canada and especially in Ontario will be interesting and will be one for the history books I think.      It will be a race in the provincial between NDP and Cons.     Federal,   I don’t think any party has a good chance except the Cons.  Progressives can’t win.   If they do we will see an increase in Ontario of 18 million immigrants as the progressive government currently plans to do by 2041.    That has to be stopped.    We don’t have the infrastructure to support that many people in Ontario.

So next election vote for the candidate, not the party.    If the candidate happens to be a conservative and has the same issues as you do with the current government then go for it.  If you area progressive, then go ahead and vote for your guy.

I’m going with my gut and voting Doug Ford and Andrew Sheer.

Advertisements

Canada’s Freedoms are Under Attack.

SilenceEqualsDeath

Many many people believe the charter is there to protect them.   It isn’t.     And this misconception has led to complacency.       Now we are in 2018 and things are not better, they are worse.

We have allowed the government to erode our charter and manipulate the law to circumvent the charter.

We do not have free speech in this country.    I keep saying this and will keep doing so.    We do not.  Those that think we do, guess again.

Here are some examples:
1.  Hate speech laws.    I was there when the federal government put these laws into place, and I didn’t like it back then.    They force people to be silence about their feelings on specific groups of people, well let’s just be honest, on everyone but White Males.    It made it legal to bash White Males and no one else.

Originally the Hate speech laws were very specific.   They use to state that it was illegal to incite violence to a specific group.  Like gay people.   Inciting violence to a group of people is called a call to action.    An example would be “Kill all the gays”  this would be a call to action.     Now fast forward to today, and the hate speech laws are changed to be really vague.

Here is an example:

Public incitement of hatred
  •  (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

    • (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

 

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

If you believe this is straight forward it is not.    For example, there is no definition of Hate in the criminal code.   And how do you incite hatred for a group?    Due to this vagueness, it is easily abused into arresting people for citing facts about a group.    For example, how black people make up the smallest percentage of the population but according to government stats, they have the highest crime rate in any group.

By saying that, if you have a different type of world view, then it could be construed as inciting hatred toward a group.     Which is bad because it silences facts that someone may not like.   And is totally dependent, on the subject viewpoint of the reader.   Doesn’t matter if my intent is not hateful.

Then here is the other issue.   A summery conviction.      A summery conviction means a judge makes this ruling.   Not a jury.   So a summery conviction usually happens in court when you have two parties before the judge and the judge listens to both sides and then rules.    Does this sound fair?      I don’t find it fair or just.   There is no justice with this law.

Next in the law we have this:

Wilful promotion of hatred

(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

  • (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

  • (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Now we have Wilful promotion of hatred.   This one is just as bad.  It prevents someone from handing out literature, writing a blog, etc from exercising their free speech.   It even states it is okay  do to so in private.   Meaning, you can’t publicly state your views on a topic about a group.   This is what this section says.   Scary huh?

So my writing this blog can be reported to the police and I could be charged with hate crimes.   Or anyone for that matter.   IF they mention any identifiable group.

Thankfully there is an out.   If the judge ruling accepts the out.   If the facts stated or communicated are true.    Here is the exact section:

Defences

(3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2)

  • (a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;

  • (b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;

  • (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or

  • (d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.

So you would have to prove the statements are true in court as the defense, usually it is the prosecution who has to prove their statements.   Guilty until proven innocent in court for the defendant in cases of hate speech.

There is an out for religious people.   Their holy writings.   So if their holy writings say gays are bad, then they can promote that.   Only if they can prove their religion says this.

If a public discussion is being had then you can talk about it, but again, privately.

So you get the idea of the laws.

So moving on, we have the trans-phobia law.   These laws state that you have to use the preferred pronouns of the trans person, otherwise you are committing a hate crime by not doing so.  This is called Compelled speech.  And no common law government has ever done this.    Communist governments, yes.  Socialist governments, yes.     Democratic ones, no.    Never.     Canada has broken away from democracy and is heading down the highway of Marxism.

Due to the universities and their Marxist ideologies coming from the gender studies courses we have seen a massive influx of kids over the past ten years coming out and entering the work force influencing society with this disastrous ideology and mentality.

They treat white males with contempt and vileness, and elevate and give special treatment to minority groups based on some invisible oppression scale.    It’s a disgusting world when you can openly be racist to white people and when the racism is pointed out, groups of black clad people come out and violently attack people under the guise of being against fascism when they themselves operate under a communist ideology which is a symbol of fascism at it’s finest.     And it is worse when many of the general public support it.

Meanwhile people from really oppressive cultures that are truly hateful, that follow a religion that wants us subjugated under their religion are protected and given succor.   Like the Islamic terrorists who are allowed to come back to Canada.  Meanwhile White Farmers from south Africa who apply for refugee status because they are being killed, raped, and beaten because of their skin color is denied entry, for simply being white.   It is disgusting that our government allows this.

Now we have bill C-71 which has passed it’s first reading.     It will effectively make it illegal to own a long gun.  (Rifle).   Which would essentially disarm the people.

When are we the people going to draw the line?   When are we the people going to protect our freedoms from the government ?

As the saying goes…   Silence = Death.    If we don’t stand up now, our freedoms will die.

Dear Supporters of Omar’s Payout…

I’ve watched the media frenzy on this story of this Terrorist and it is absolutely disgusting how people can support Justin Trudeau’s decision to pay out ten and a half million dollars to this man.

I will start with why I think the payout itself is disgusting.     This man, was indoctrinated into Islamic extremism by his family.    He was trained to kill, from a young age.     At the age of 15 years old he could legally join the terrorist organization, who at the time was bent on destroying western civilization.    He killed an unarmed soldier who was a medic, and blinded another.   Those are the ones we know of and he confessed to.

Even here in Canada we will send a child to trial as an adult if the crime fits need.   This was no child.   He built bombs, killed soldiers and even to this day, has shown absolutely no remorse for what he has done.      On the contrary.    He sued our government, for cash, because of his treatment, at the hands of our allies, who is the enemy of the United States, Canada and all the other western nations.     For the treatment he received while in Guantanamo Bay Prison.

Oh but he was tortured you hear from supporters.     No, no he wasn’t.    He wasn’t water boarded.   He didn’t get bamboo shoots shoved under his finger nails.    He was deprived of sleep.

How this came to be “torture” was back when he was incarcerated,  some officials from our country went to go see him, and he told them he wasn’t being allowed to sleep normally and was tired.     The Canadian officials came back and claimed he was being tortured.     The government struggled and worked with the Americans to get him released back into Canada.    It did take awhile, but he was allowed to come back to Canada and as an apology to him and his alleged torture, he wasn’t sent to our prison.   He was free and considered time served.      This was supposed to be the end of it.

Omar decided, no no, I was tortured and the government did nothing so my charter rights were violated.    He sued and won.   The Supreme Court agreed.     Then Omar sued for 200 million, from the Canadian government and it was in it’s third appeals process in the court system when Justin Trudeau, the ultimate SJW/Progressive Islamic Supporter,  decided to settle with Ten and a Half Million dollars, and to make matters worse, he tried to hide it from the public and made sure he was out of the country when it was leaked, so he could hide from the media, with the hope that the frenzy would die down.

This is why I’m disgusted.   I’m disgusted by Omar because he to this day has yet to apologize for what he did.   He has shown no remorse for what he has done.    No, it’s quite the opposite, he is claiming he is the victim.    He is the victim from the Americans, our government, and so therefor we the taxpayer must pay this convicted and self confessed terrorist taxpayer dollars and make him a millionaire.

This is disgusting and so anti Canadian in this whole situation.    I have been hearing from people trying to justify this support and oh he is the victim here.   Etc, etc, etc.     And everything brings bile to my throat.

Here is my message to the supporters of Omar the Terrorist.

YOU are the problem.   YOU are the reason why people die.    You are the equivalent of a nazi sympathizer.     Supporting self confessed terrorists and trying to justify giving them money is why I hate people like you.   Yes I hate you.    I hate you because I realize that if you support something like this so vehemently and  see nothing wrong with this, shows me that your moral compass is skewed to the direction of evil.   Yes, evil.    Islamic Terrorists and Islamic terrorism is evil and shouldn’t be tolerated, let alone supported, by anyone who claims to be Canadian or American or anyone who comes from a westernized nation.

I’m a gay man.   Islamic Terrorists are not our friends.   They want me dead.  Simply for being gay.   They want all of us dead if you don’t want to join their religion.   There is no trying to justify their actions, trying to pay them money for some imagined rights that they believe to have been violated.

STOP SUPPORTING TERRORISTS AND TERRORISM YOU PROGRESSIVE LUNATIC.

Abortion – “My body My Right!” Why this argument fails to logic and reason.

o-ABORTION-facebook.jpg

Abortion.  Such a touchy subject and one that many women will scream about.   In fact with the current american election looming, the subject has come up due to Hilary’s opinion that the unborn have no rights in law until they are born.   Which means, in her eyes, that a child can be ripped apart via abortion right up until the time labor starts.

This has caused a debate on abortion to renew again.  I’ve seen this debate happen numerous times over  the past forty years.   However, now with age comes wisdom and understanding.

The understanding that “my body my right” is false.     I will list my reasons why.

Let’s begin with conception.    Life starts there.   The mother’s egg is dormant until the father’s sperm penetrates the egg and gives it the spark of life and energy it needs to start cell reproduction.

One of the arguments from women is that they give life or create life.   Technically this is incorrect.   At best you can call a woman an incubator.   They carry and gestate that child in their body but the “spark” that created that life, came from the father.

The cells reproduce and form a child.   During that process there are many stages.    Many argue that there is no “life” until there is a heartbeat or a brain etc.    This really is a strawman argument.  Since as I stated the spark started at inception.

Now, with that being said many argue that the fetus can be aborted right until week 31-35.  In Canada, this is 24 weeks.  This is what a fetus looks like at that time.

fetus24weeks

Now I don’t know about you, but this does not look like a bunch of cells that get scraped off the uterus wall.     Yet, the abortions can and do happen this late.

So the argument of “My Body, My Right” is false.  It disregards the life of the child as nothing.   So I can understand how some could see it as murder.

If anyone has watched the Videos from the investigation into Planned Parenthood, you would have seen the horrors that they present.   Selling the aborted baby parts for profit.   The staff separating brain, legs, arms as if they were never human life.

Then we have father’s rights.   Or rather, the lack of reproductive rights.    Many of the people who argue for abortion always mention that “If the father didn’t want a child, they shouldn’t have had sex”.     This argument is without any kind of reason, coherent thought or logic.    The reason being is, the same logic can be applied to the women.   “If she didn’t want a child she shouldn’t have had sex”.

Now, don’t get me wrong.  I’m not against abortion completely.   I firmly believe there should be allowances in law for it.  Such as cases of women or girls getting pregnant from rape, or incest.   Or in medical needs, such as her life is in danger from the pregnancy.   Those to me seem to be reasonable.

We have had over 50 years in Canada of proper sex education, women have access to more than twenty kind of contraceptive options.   Everyone, and I mean everyone knows the pill is not 100 percent and yet we still have unwanted pregnancies.

So maybe it’s time ladies to stop blaming men for your pregnancy?   Men have 3 options to them.  A condom, Abstinence or a vasectomy.    The power, the choices and the rights are all yours.   So if you get pregnant and it is unwanted, then to me, it is your fault. At least, ninety percent on you.

As, I have written, men do not have rights when it comes to being a father or not.   You scoff and will rant, but it is true.

Men have zero choice in becoming a father.   Once the sperm, penetrates the egg and cell division starts then women have all the power and the choice in society.    If a woman gets pregnant here are her choices.

1.  She can choose to abort.  2.  She can choose to keep the child.  3. She can choose to give the child up for adoption.  4. She can choose to not name the child’s father on the birth certificate.   5. She can choose to force the father to pay child support.  6.  She can choose to let the father give up his so called “parental rights as father”.   7.  She can choose to deny the father any visits to the child.

All the choices are hers.     This is why,  I think the laws  in this country concerning abortion need to take a more balanced approach to, well, every aspect.

We need to have this discussion as a nation.   People need to be honest and less selfish about it and that will start with you ladies, cause we men, don’t have the rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Mental Disorder Discovered- IVD

Bipolar Disorder1

 

I have discussions with people both online and in real life about current affairs, politics, activism, and more.     Many people are passionate about what they are discussing and as such, I really don’t mind when the discussion or debate gets heated.    If both people understand that the discussion or debate is just that, then you can have a heated debate without taking it personally.

However, many people out there are unable to cope with this idea and do take things personally.   And those people tend to be the worst.   Especially some of the commentators on social media sites.   Instead of saying something constructive or conducive to the debate or discussion at hand, they of course, resort to name calling or attacking someone for stating something they have every right to state.     And instead of being civilized they become these lunatics with an axe to grind.

After decades of being active online,  I can spot these people very easily.   They try to come off as some sort of moral authority on their opinion and attack someone by using slurs that sound racist and bigoted.   Then when you confront them they invariably turn their ire on you when you defend yourself or a friend  from them.   When that doesn’t work and their argument falls apart they then try to slander you to try to get you to move away from the topic at hand in hopes that you will defend yourself from their offensive and then finally claim victim status saying you are the aggressor while they are the poor victim.

This happens almost daily online with people.   They think that being offended by something they see online gives them the automatic moral right to attack people, and when they are defended against, they pretend to be victims of abuse online.    There are many people out there who do this.   I see many feminists, SJWs and liberals who do this.

New Disorder….??

This is what I call the Infantile Victim Disorder or IVD.   You get an IVD when you have a warped set of beliefs that cause you to believe there is a mysterious patriarchy made up of old white men out to get you.    Or that you think you are superior to the other person due to their body parts.  And even due to a skin tone that is not considered Caucasian.

Symptoms include,  being “triggered“.  Using the word Problematic,  and telling men they have male privilege or the other variant if you are a person of another color,  having white male privilege.

Other symptoms may include:   Obesity, Poverty, Neon color in hair, getting undressed in public to march against rape, yelling and spitting on men at university, submitting false rape claims, false reports of sexual assault.  Raping men.  Being the aggressor in domestic violence.  Lesbianism.

If you suspect you have IVD, please go see a psychiatrist immediately.     Usually sufferers of IVD also have Bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and project their issues and blame others for problems that don’t exist or are the cause of the sufferer’s own actions.

Open Letter to the Leaders of Canada

To Justin Trudeau, his Cabinet, and the current sitting members of Parliament,

I am going to step away from the main virtue that Canadian people are known for, and that is being nice.    I’m angry.   I am angry at you.  All of you.  You failed.   You failed in your duty.    The main one to which all people believe in, when it comes to a democratic nation.

The duty of protecting it’s people.     You failed.    You failed in helping our Canadian citizens John Ridsdel and Robert Hall.

Abu Sayyaf demand Canadian government pay ransom for hostage Robert Hall in new video

While our Prime Minister was busy with PR stunts and photo opportunities, these men, our own citizens had their lives cut short by people who have no respect for freedom, democracies, religions or life.   They pleaded from their government to intervene in some way.   You stood by and did nothing.   They asked you in the very real terror to do your duty to protect them, and you were silent.

“To the Canadian government, I’m told to tell you to meet the demand,” Hall said in the video. “I don’t know what you’re doing but, you’re not doing anything for us. John is being sacrificed, his family has been decimated, and I’m not sure why or what you’re waiting for.”

Then afterwards,  Justin you went on camera and gave a speech, which amounted to nothing.   It meant nothing.   You did nothing to prevent this tragedy, nothing to protect our citizens, our brothers.    You had the power, the authority but you stood by and did nothing.

You took a policy of standing by and doing nothing after decades of terrorism and threats to free people of the world.   Instead you sit back and kill the people you have  a duty to protect and wring your hands and give your condolences to the families of the dead who have to live with the loss and the knowledge of the horrible ways these victims died.

It’s time you, and I mean a all of you stand up and do your duty to the people of canada and do something to stop these terrorists from doing this again to any Canadian.   It’s time you did your duty.    If you cannot, or will not, protect our people when these types of things happen then all of you need to step down from your positions and let real men and women, who have the courage to stand up against terrorists who kidnap and kill our people.

Instead of spending your time in front of the press, flashing love signs and promoting feminism and spending billions each month, do your job.

The policy of not paying ransoms has failed.   It can be proven with the evidence of the bodies of these men, and every single man, woman and child this has happened to over the past 20 years.

If a police officer stands by, and does nothing and remains silent, while he watches a citizen be killed by another he can be considered an accessory to the crime of murder.    You, the cabinet and the members of parliament are guilty of being accessories to acts terrorism.

Do something or step down from your positions you cowards.

Violating Rights in the Name of Safety?

Human-rights-violations

We all have rights.   Many of those rights are violated today under the guise of “for your safety” or for “public safety”.      Like the era of Hitler when he came into power, pro police and pro authority supporters encourage this.    They praise police when they very obviously have broken the law or violated someone’s individual human rights.
Today I read a very vague article in my local newspaper, that lead me to believe the person mentioned in it had her rights violated.   Which of course prompted a heated debate as I seemed to be the only one who recognized this.

Here is the article:

http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6470583-drunk-woman-spits-in-police-officer-s-face-at-hamilton-hospital/

Now, after reading the article it does not say why she was in the hospital or why she was angry.     So we can only speculate.    I am someone who presumes innocence until proven guilty, so I will presume she is innocent of any crime.

Which leaves only a few reasons for her to act this way.  The most logical and basic is that she was forced there against her will, got angry and spit on the cop.   Who then proceeded to charge her for getting a little wet.

The comment section heated on social media when I mentioned that her rights had most likely been violated by the cops, the medical professions and possibly the paramedics if they used them.

This caused a stir.   People stood up and commented that the cops was assaulted, but really were they?

If you are taken against your will to someplace you didn’t want to go, just because you were drunk, isn’t that kidnapping?   I would think so.  In fact the Legal definition of kidnapping is:

Kidnapping

The crime of unlawfully seizing and carrying away a person by force or Fraud, or seizing and detaining a person against his or her will with an intent to carry that person away at a later time.

This is what they did. That is again assuming that she didn’t want to go and didn’t commit any crimes while drunk.

Many would say that it was for her safety and that makes it right.     Actually no it doesn’t.  The only person who can make that decision is the person in question.    The only time that doesn’t apply is when they are unable to due to mental illness or they are unconscious.

In the 90s, I lived in BC and at that time there was a serious heroin problem.  100% pure heroin was being sold on the streets and anyone who would inject themselves with it would overdose and die within 3o minutes.   This was such a major problem that they had paramedics driving ambulances in the alleys and looking for unconscious drug addicts.

When they found a conscious drug user, they would offer help, and if they person said no they legally could not do anything.    If that happened they would wait until that person lost consciousness and then act.

When I asked the  authorities about that, they said that by law they cannot force a medical treatment against someone’s will unless they were unable to make that decision themselves.   That is to me the right thing to do.

Now back to the woman in the article, if she was drunk and they transported her to the hospital and she refused medical treatment, then forcing her to have it would have made the medical staff at fault.  And the police trying to “deescalate” the situation would not have made it any better.     No means no.     And since the police in this age are not known to be gentle or nice , we can only assume their idea of deescalate was to use force on her to hold her down.   To which the only thing the woman could do to defend herself would be to spit on the cop.

Some paramedics piped up and stated they deal with drunk people all the time who don’t want help and have to “deal” with the violence all the time.  Same with some nurses at the hospitals.     Here is my message you to and to any of these people who think they are helping someone.   “NO MEANS NO.”  Drunk or sober, you do not have the right to force a medical treatment, force someone to go somewhere, without their consent or against their will.   NEVER!   If they attack you in anyway it is within their right to defend themselves because regardless of your intent, you are violating their rights and attacking them”.

Can people understand this?    If a drunk driver is held accountable for their actions of getting in the vehicle and driving while drunk then they have the ability to say no to unwanted help.    If you violate this and take them to a hospital and try to perform a medical procedure, any medical procedure then you are at fault and not the drunk person.

Pass this on and share this.   The more people that get educated on rights, then maybe we can fix this from happening to others.

 

 

Feminism is becoming a Cult…

women-rights

We are now seeing generations of people coming out of our education system, less educated, and less able to think critically than when they went in.   As a result, we are seeing these same people deny the definition of words that are listed in dictionaries and going with their own.     Case in point, is when you point out the dictionary definition of feminism to someone, and they say “well that’s YOUR definition.  My definition is …..”.

This is the idiocy that I am speaking of.    It has gotten so bad that these people cannot even think critically about what they are even saying, and follow the cult mentality of the ideology.

Here is a comparison of a religion, to feminism.

Religion have a god and a devil.

Feminism has well, Feminism and he evil Patriarchy.

Religion has the oppressed and the oppressors.

Feminism has the ever victims called Women and Men are oppressing them.  Even male babies and men who die protecting them.

Religion has an ideology that has a list of sins.

Feminism has this too.   Women are sinners if they support men who don’t follow feminism, who decide to be housewives, etc.

Men are born in sin.   Are all potential rapists and aggressors.

Religion has a persecution complex.

So does feminism.   Patriarchy keeps women down!

Religion has a Pope!

Feminism has Justin Trudeau! (Irony)

The comparisons can go on and on.    The current feminist pope… I mean mouthpiece,  recently proclaimed that Liberals should be considered a movement, and not a political party.     He is blurring the lines purposely.   He wants people to start thinking of the liberal party as a movement because this way it makes it easier for the feminist movement to control it more openly instead of via puppet strings.

We need to stop this and shout it down.  Everywhere, and every-time we see it.     We may not all agree on political topics, but identity politics should not be part of government.    I can vividly see a future where men are forced to sit to pee and getting angry at a woman or speaking against a woman becomes a crime if these people continue and have their way.

Keep fighting for freedom people.   Liberals/Feminism is not freedom, but a cage.

 

What happened to our homes are our castles?

Bodiam Castle, East Sussex, UK
Bodiam Castle, East Sussex, UK

What happens when your home is no longer your castle?  What does it feel like when you, get told that you have no rights on who enters your home or when?

I found out today that in Canada, we do not have any rights to our property.  At least the government believes we don’t.    In the interest of safety, they have created laws that empower their  agents to think they can tell us that they can, without any warrant, to enter our homes.

Now the reason may sound reasonable to some, but the reason does not matter to me.  It is the rights they trample over.

Today during a neighborhood association meeting, we had a representative from the fire department.   She was quite nice and I had a great respect for that branch.   Until today that is.     She had been there to represent the local fire department and with a smile, informed us that the Carbon Monoxide detectors had almost been installed in all the homes in my area, except for a few.   She then proceeded to inform us that in those homes that they were unable to gain access to, they would ticket the homeowners and basically enter the home, without a warrant to install these Carbon Monoxide detectors/inspect the home.

Of course being who I am, this raised huge red flags to me.   Our homes are supposed to be our sanctuaries and no one, should be allowed to enter except in emergency or with a warrant if suspected of a crime.

According to the fire department however, they can and will enter people’s homes if the home owners refuse them entry when they come knocking for the carbon monoxide detectors.

The legal implications for this is huge.    The first implication is that you have no say on who enters the home if they are a government agent.   The police are supposed to get a warrant to enter someone’s home, but the fire department doesn’t if there is no apparent emergency?

If the fire department can be granted these powers, with no due process, then what else has the Canadian governments created?

Needless to say this made me instantly angry.   Here was a government representative, telling us homeowners that we had no say.   No authority.     Well needless to say that I promptly informed her that no law can decide who enters my home and If they tried I will fight them in court and defend my home from intrusion, because without a warrant, I consider anyone entering my home as a home invader.  Uniform or not.     She then tried to threaten me with getting a police officer to come in to “explain” the law to me.

This kind of heavy strong arm tactic is the same type that dictatorships use and if you don’t capitulate they throw you in jail or kill you.    No cop can enter your home without your permission or a warrant, or unless there is some emergency like a 911 call from inside the home, fire, or break in.

They cannot, ever enter without a warrant.   To do so, they would be violating your rights to privacy and your home.    Think of all those people who have been victims of a home invasion and imagine the home invaders being the government.    The feelings you would feel would be no different.    Many people who have experienced this from cops or any government agency have described their feelings after as the same as those who have had a home invasion by criminals.     No difference.

Now, someone at the meeting cited that police can enter with just cause, and the answer is a swift no they can’t.   They need to get a warrant to enter.  If they have “just cause” then they can bring that to a judge, while just cause is not usually enough to get an arrest warrant, it can be enough to justify a warrant to enter someone’s home, but to give any other agencies sweeping powers to enter your home with any due process is a violation of a person’s rights.

We need to stop letting these people get away with this.  We need to stop being so passive when it comes to government and law enforcement.

Maybe they are misunderstanding the law?   Maybe they have been told by their superiors they can do this and let the lawyers handle any blowback?   Who knows, but this is not what living in a free country means.

Feminism is an Ideology based on Hate.

woman-hitting-man-2915823

I will say this over and over, until feminism ideology is treated by society, exactly what it is, which is an ideology of hatred of men.   Period.   People are leaving feminism ideology in droves but it won’t be finished unless it is legally recognized as a hate group.  Much like Neo-Nazi’s are treated.

I’ve heard the arguments from pro-feminists who give this world view description of it that is pure fantasy and not based on reality.   Even from the so called men, who support feminism, have been brainwashed in this ideology of hate, that they cannot even see it.

Here are some common arguements and lies that pro-feminists use to defend the hate group ideology.

1.  Feminism is about equality for all.

Yes we have all heard that one, and we all know it isn’t true.   The dictionary is a book that has the definitions of words in the english language and it tells a different definition.

Here it is: Feminism

The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.

Now this reads like it is about equal rights but it isn’t.    Here is a real definition of equality.

Egalitarianism

The doctrine that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.

Notice the difference feminists?   No?  Let me “mansplain” for you.

The first definition devotes the energy to supporting women’s rights only.    It operates on the assumption they are treated less than men.

Egalitarianism however, is one of equality, for everyone.   Not based on gender, not based on race, or sexuality.     In other words, it doesn’t give special treatment for one group.

Back to common arguments in the defense of feminism:

2. Feminism cares about men!

No actually it doesn’t.   It is a sexist, bigotted and homophobic ideaology.   It is a facist movement that was co-oped back in the 60s, by angry women.   They teach in gender studies courses the division of people.  It classifies them and puts them into victim groups with white men being the oppressors.

Let’s delve further into this. intersectionality:

The interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:
through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us’

The whole definition is about separating and categorizing based on oppression.   This ideology is taught in gender studies courses and taught this is still happening in western culture and society.    It teaches that we need to label ourselves and plot our victim hood on some scale of privilege vs oppression.

The final thing about intersectionanilty is that is doesn’t include white males.   Not one feminist, or their supporting men, will say that white men are an oppressed class and part of this intersectionanility.   In fact they will go out of their way and angrily pronounce that white men are the most privileged people in society, who oppress everyone else.

3.  Feminism loves men:

Sure they do, because this is their main scapegoat for all their projection of self hate.

Here is a classic example of blaming men by a blogger who wrote an article about why the world needs feminism.

https://andienns.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/77-reasons-we-still-need-feminism/

The gist of the article is that men are still the oppressors and still   I will follow up on this article with a list of my own to counter this one because this is the type of nonsense we need to speak out against.

4.  Feminism isn’t about hate.   It’s about love!

I heard this one by so many feminists, that it makes me so angry every-time I hear it.   It also shows they are down syndrome retarded in their thinking.     Here are some quotes by feminists that show the love!

“All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman.”
Catherine MacKinnon

“I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it.”
Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan.

“Men’s sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can ‘reach WITHIN women to fuck/construct us from the inside out.’ Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women’s own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, ‘even if she does not feel forced.’
Judith Levine, (explicating comment profiling prevailing misandry.)

“I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.”
Andrea Dworkin; from her book Ice and Fire .

“I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.”
Robin Morgan

 

From ‘A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985:

MALE:…represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants…the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female.

MAN:…an obsolete life form… an ordinary creature who needs to be watched…a contradictory baby-man…

I could go on and on but you get the idea.  Feminism is about the hatred and subjugation of men.   It teaches men they are evil and that women are best people.

It is time we denounce feminism, challenge it’s conceptions and presume it is gospel truth and fight the hatred of it.

We have allowed feminist ideology to infect society in such a way it is now affecting everyone as a whole.   It is a lie that teaches hate.   It infects our schools, our government, our jobs, even our homes.

Stand up.  Say no to feminism and challenge anyone who supports it.   It will be the only way we can stop this hate group.